LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Queries Participated

Anantha Sowrya   12 July 2011 at 22:44

evidences[exhbiits] can be manipulated by IO/SHO or by 498aF

Dear Members,

I had filed RTI for all the allegations[cruelty/dowry] i.e. the evidences[Exhibits] given by the 498acomplainant.

I got reply that there are nil exhbits give by the complainant for her claims made.

Query:
a)if any exhbits not given by the 498acomplainant at the time of the complaint,
are there any chance that IO/SHO can collect any exhibits before or after filing chargesheet?

b)If any exhibits collected before or after filing chargesheet, it has to be mentioned in chargesheet or enclosed with chargesheet?

c)After chargesheet submitted to court, the IO/SHO have any chances to
mention exhibits in chargesheet or enclose exhibits with chargesheet, if so, he needs any permission?

d)Or the 498acomplainant can produce any exhbits about her allegations @ time of the trial. if so, is it acccepted by the Court[is it a correct process in law]

Please enlighten me.

Anonymous   05 May 2011 at 23:55

Police producing very late evidence 3 years after chargesheet when discharge was being ruled upon!

A client of mine had a false case filed against him.He was initially denied bail by the lower court but the High Court severely reprimanded the magistrate and granted him bail.They soon filed a charge sheet which interstingly contained a forensic report indicating that his signatures did not match with those on the offending document-he was charged under 420,468,471 and 511.We filed for a discharge but the police from nowhere produced another forensic report which stated the exact opposite-that his signatures tallied.No one knew of this report before and it was produced only at the time of discharge application-clearly fabricated.I am advised that the Supreme Court had ruled recently that evidence produced suspiciously late should be disregarded.Can anyone help me with the citation?