anshul sangal
03 October 2009 at 08:50
Sir what is the scope of labour law as a career point of view in private company for law graduate?
muthukumar
01 October 2009 at 19:44
Sirs,
my father was working at tamilnadu electricty board and now he was retirned from the service from 2005. During his service period from 1978, he had taken medical leave from the year 1988 to 1995. After that he has approached the concerned authorities to join, they have refused him for a period of eight years. Finally, he has got the job by the order of the High court and he has joined the duty at 2003 and gets retired at 2005.
The e.b.board has calculated his service from the period 1978 to 1988 and 2003 to 2005 and given a pension of Rs.2000/- which is very low. They can caculate the period of service from 1988 to 1995 as delay in service and 1995 to 2003 as loss of pay and they could not calculate pension for such period. The negligence is in the part of e.b., because they have not given the job at the correct period.
so, kindly give me an advice in this regard.
Thanking all.
Yash Pal Ahuja
30 September 2009 at 20:47
Whether a death of an I.P. due to heart attack during the course of employment is an employment injury under the esi act. Please also provide the latest judgements in the matter.
Suresh C Mishra
30 September 2009 at 19:40
All the friends are invited to comment on the issue of compliance of the Minimum Wages ACt in State of UP.
1- who is the appropriate authotity to hear the cases arises out of section 12 and 13 and 14 of the act?
2- The notification of SG OF UP in this respects does not say that the case of S 12 are covered by this G O. /
3.Whether the Assistant Labour Commisisoner are Competent Authority or Not to hear the case.
4. if not then how compliance of provisions of the ACt is possible ?
PL participate in this debate with all the material < Notification , or with the cited judgements where this matter is taken up and facts of jurisdiction as competent authority has bee dealt with . thank in advance
R k PADHI
30 September 2009 at 19:06
Sir,
I have been selected for the post of Scientific Officer in a central govt. department in nov-2007 after written and a interview test. some in the selected list have already got their appointment.Two candidate immediate junior to me also got their appointment. Now the department is telling that my case is pending as there is no vacancy right now and appointment letter will be issued when any vacancy arises. Kindly guide with legal provisions.
chandra1
30 September 2009 at 09:54
A judgement passed in w.p.no 7571/2005 is being enclosed herewith kindly advised me whether the services of the petitioner can be regularised. A special Appeal has been preferred agaist the judgement and the application of intrim relief of the state has been rejected.
Ajay Kumar
29 September 2009 at 13:13
Dear Sir/s,
Can I get any help and assiatance to address the issue of my company not paying salaries and expenses for the last five months? If so, kindly advice what should I do so that I can send the detailed account of events.
With kind regards
Ajay Kumar Srivastava
28 September 2009 at 17:48
I would like to know on the following matter. In case a limited company which is covered in PF Act in WB has a branch in UP, where it has employed less than 10 employess and most of them are appointed at fixed remuneration at 12000 PM or more. Has company any liability of deduction of PF at the branch and if so what in case the company has not done so? When asked about this matter the employees were told that as their appointment was at a salary more than 6500 PM they are not covered under PF Act is it true? What remedy lies if the company has not issued appointment letters but salary is paid through cheque?
Arihant AC
28 September 2009 at 12:19
Dear Experts,
Happy Dashera
Friends can anybody have the Formula how to calculate Bonus Forms A, B, & D
Its Urgent
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
insustrial dispute
WE HAD TWO UNITS OPERATING UNDER THE SAME NAME. ONE OF THE UNITS LOCATED IN HARYANA WAS CLOSED AND THE WORKERS RAISED DISPUTE BY NOT ACCEPTING THE COMPENSATION OFFERED TO THEM. FOUR OF THE WORKERS MANAGED TO GET THE AWARD EXPARTE IN THEIR FAVOUR FOR CONTINUITY OF SERVICE WITH BACK WAGES. WHILE THE REST PURSUED THE CASE AT THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL. WE MANAGED TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE BY PAYING THE WORKERS INCLUDING THREE OF THE WORKERS WHO HAD EXPARTE AWARD IN THEIR FAVOUR. THIS WAS DONE IN THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ITSELF. ALL THE WORKERS ACCEPTED THE COMPENSATION AND RELENQUISHED ALL THEIR RIGHTS. BUT ONE WORKER WHO HAS AWARD IN HIS FAVOUR HAS APPROACHED THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL FOR COMPUTATION OF BACKWAGES TILL DATE INCLUDING THE BENEFITS WHICH WERE AVAILABLE WHILE THE UNIT WAS FUNCTIONING? IS THIS CLAIM TENABLE?