sanjeev saraswat
20 March 2010 at 21:26
a case in which
when a labour is died while he was on his duty of delevering gas cilender, traveling on a privare vechile hired by his employer i.e gas agency,
a pettition is file in m.a.c.t in which compensation is claim from vechile owner and insurance company of vehile and after 2 month a n another pettition filed in labour court in which compansation is claim from the employer and insurence company of employer.
both the pettition claimants are same but opp, respondence are different.
in first pettion respondence are 1. vehile owner 2. national insurance company
in 2nd in w.c.a respondence are 1.gas agency owner 2.orental insirance co.
insurance co. saying in labour court that only one pettition is maintainable, because of section 167 of m.v act
while i want to claim from both the parties
what will i do
Sanjeev Panda
20 March 2010 at 16:57
Workman approached the tribunal against the departmental enquiry. The Tribunal framed two issues
1. Whether the departmental enquiry was as per the Principal of Natural Justice and Fairplay
2. Relief
After completion of evidence and finally the Tribunal decided the First Issue in favour of Workman. Before the second issue decided the Company approached the High Court. After a gap of 8 years workman file an application u/S 17-B of ID Act before the High Court.
Now my question is whether is application u/s 17-B is maintainable in two aspects – Delay of 8 years (2) Whether Application under Section 17-B is maintainable, if award is not passed but one of the party approached higher court under Article 226 of Constitution of India
MS Moorthy
20 March 2010 at 16:19
Dear Expert,
Income tax exemption avilable to employees for LTA travel for any 2 travels in the block of 4 years. Please guide if family members could travel independant of employee & if so should the destination of travel be same.
Some companies are insisting for LTA claim that all memebers travel together ! If any family member left out his eligibility is lost. Is it justified.
Regards
MS Moorthy
Anonymous
20 March 2010 at 12:31
i am working at VVP engineering college rajkot gujrat. i was selected as assistant professor in sept 2003. as per condition of appointment order i have to complete phd in seven years otherwise my appointment will be autometically cancelled [as on 5/9/10]. institute alllowed me to do phd in normal university vacation only at ms university baroda and against that i had sign bond of five years and one lakh rs. i am not able to complete phd. our chairman has threatan me many times that they will terminate me if i do not complete phd as per appointment order. under this circumtances i found new job now.
as soon as they heard that i found new job they are showing my bond and may force me to stay five years after phd completed. i can not complete phd. i want to go out of this mental torture . what should i do? i have already given three month notice to institute.
i have signed bond on 5/10/05 . which has completed five years
Anonymous
20 March 2010 at 11:38
company not issueing final settalement, company intensialy delaying the same after continualy feedback. HR point out towards HOD and HOD pointing out to HR.
waht is the solution of such kind of behaviar form high level managers.
suggest me the path by which i can get my settelment at the earliest.
Anonymous
20 March 2010 at 11:31
I doest want to work for completing my notice period becase of unfavorable working evironment (due to boss). wht are the options with me?
Anonymous
20 March 2010 at 11:23
one month salary not given by company,
whts is further step to take?
how to approch company head?
sanjeev saraswat
19 March 2010 at 19:56
a case in which
when a labour is died while he was on his duty of delevering gas cilender, traveling on a privare vechile hired by his employer i.e gas agency,
a pettition is file in m.a.c.t in which compensation is claim from vechile owner and insurance company of vehile and after 2 month a n another pettition filed in labour court in which compansation is claim from the employer and insurence company of employer.
both the pettition claimants are same but opp, respondence are different.
in first pettion respondence are 1. vehile owner 2. national insurance company
in 2nd in w.c.a respondence are 1.gas agency owner 2.orental insirance co.
insurance co. saying in labour court that only one pettition is maintainable .
while i want to claim from both the parties
what will i do
Himanshu
19 March 2010 at 17:03
If any person working in a Factory under the influence of Alcohol or Drugs.
Under which law action can be taken against him.
Please advice.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Compassionate Appointment
I am a Lawyer at Nagpur. I have filed One Writ Petition Before the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court Claiming the Compassionate Appointment for a Son of second wife of deceased who was Hindu by religion and his first wife gave no objection ofr such appointment. The Employer WCL is having rule for appointment on compassionate ground.
Recently I have read in News paper that Justice Markandey Katju and Justice R.M. Lodha has given a verdict that son of second wife is entitled for compassionate appointment when first wife is having no objection. I have searched for the judgement reported an unreported but I could not found it. Kindly help me to get the judgement and opinion on the case.