Anonymous
03 May 2011 at 08:21
hello sir,
after giving a proper 1 month notice period and task handover my employer is still not issuing release letter.he is saying to complete a project fully .Threatening me to make me blacklisted and give me a release letter with negative remarks.Please help
Rahul
02 May 2011 at 11:16
I just want to know about mathadi laws in Maharashtra?
Can we unload a truck without Mathadi in Navi Mumbai?
And about the rates of Mathadi in Navi mumbai?
vijaya raghava rao takkellapat
01 May 2011 at 19:52
Sri T.V.Raghava Rao, TTA Khammam SSA of A.P Circle declared qualified under 35% quota and completed JTO Phase-I training for 16 weeks (as per the new pattern) w.e.f 16-8-2004 under category-II at RTTC Hyderabad and waiting for posting. He is now declared qualified under 15% quota for the year 1996.
It is requested to clarify whether
(a) Sri T.V.Raghava Rao may be posted as JTO with recruitment year 1996
(b) The candidate is required to be sent for JTO training again.
The same officer issued another letter Ref-12 Subject as
Formation of JTO Induction Batch for Category–I & Category–II candidates selected on review of results against 35% & 15% Qualifying / Competitive departmental quota for the year 1999 Quota-Reg
As per the Ref-12 letter that is clear that he was got clarified and understand that 35% & 15% quota candidates are eligible for same phase – I training. Even after the same officer has not given me posting order.
As per the Ref- 6 to 10 I was discharged JTO duties from 31-5-2005 to 19-6-2007 as JTO (Officiating).
from 20-7-2010 i performed as regular JTO.
hence i request that any cases successfully got the regularisation of officiating period previously.
if it's there plz give the details of case no and court where it is.
author : Anonymous
Posted On
05 September 2010
plz help me to know whether any successful previous cases like this
Abhay Kumar
01 May 2011 at 10:12
I joined one of the leading PSUs on 04-08-2008 as Executive Trainee. On joining I executed a service agreement bond of 2.5 lakh for successfully completing one year training and three years service afterwards. Along with my appointment letter I received short terms and conditions of appointment in which the folowing was written.
“You shall not be released during your training period or during the period of operation of service agreement bond for any employment elsewhere or for study on full time basis requiring grant of study leave. You shall not apply for employment elsewhere during your training period or service period of three years, thereafter without the prior permission of management. In case you have already applied and/or appeared in any such test, interview etc before joining the service of the company, in the event of your selection you shall not join the new organization, unless you have fully complied with the terms and conditions of the service agreement bond. It may however be mentioned in the case of employment in Govt. /PSU, the bond is transferable.”
Because it was written that bond is transferable to govt/PSU I joined the company and executed the bond.
In january 2009 while I was an executive trainee governed under Apprenticeship Act 1961, I applied for UPSC Engg Services Examination-2009.I did not forward my application through my company because as per service rules no application is forwarded during the concurrence of service agreement bond. So I directly sent my application to UPSC. Before making my appication I gave a written intimation that i am applying for this exam.I got selected and alloted IRSME on the basis of UPSC ESE 2009. I gave a three months prior intimation in december 2010 in which I requested transfer of my service agreement bond as I was leaving to join a govt job. But only one week before my relieving I was issued a notice that I need to pay the bond amount before I get relieved.
I immediately raised objection to this notice and wrote a letter to executive director HR asking him reason for not transferring my bond. I did not get any reply to this letter till my relieving date and hence I paid the bond amount as I needed to get relieved.
About one week later I recieved the reply, "As per the DPE guideline DPE/Guidelines/II(c)/29 Service agreement bond is only transferrable in case the candidate applies through proper channel. As you applied directly to UPSC hence we regret that your bond can not be transferred. "
I believe my bond should have been transferred because
1.It has been done in case of most of other candidates including some from my own batch and joing same service and none of them had appied through proper channel.
2.As per comapany's service rules I never had the option of applying through proper channel.
3, The above mentioned DPE guidelines is applicable to employees of CPSEs but at the time of making my application I was a trainee registred under Apprenticeship act 1961, so there was no point of applying through proper channel.
4. Except the above mentioned line regarding bond transfer nothing is written about bond transfer so I believe it should have been done unconditionally.
5. Moreover I believe the motive behind not transferring my service agreement bond was to mentally harass me so that to give a message for employees not to leave before completion of service agreement bond.
6. Also there is no consistency in the calculation of bond amount.
Dear friends here i need support from all of you as I am not legally educated and do not know how to move forward in this case. All this has been done because of the intention of few officers in HR dept to cause mental harrasment to employees who leave the oragnisation.
Kindly provide me guidance as soon as possible
Anonymous
01 May 2011 at 10:08
a wrong statement is given and basing on which the case was decided in appeal in high court. now can they havw option to say that the fact was submitted by mistake and seek correction in special leave petition if failed in supreme court
Anonymous
01 May 2011 at 09:04
I was working for a small time unlisted company for about 7 months before leaving to join another, as per my appointment letter, there is a clause of serving 30 day notice period, however, no mention of how it would be deducted. there is neither an HR department nor any policy document on it too, on top of that, there was no mention of any amount to be deducted at the time of resignation as well. I served a notice period of 15 days before getting relieved. now they are deducting a 15 day gross salary as my notice shortfall. As per industry standards are they justified in doing so? if not, then what can I do to get my dues back? AS per my knowledge, the notice period should be on basic salary. Please advice if my understanding is correct. thanks
Anonymous
30 April 2011 at 23:29
An employee worked in a bank as deposit collecteron commission basis has resigned from serice after putting ten years of service. The bak employed more than ten employees.Whther the employee on commission basis is eligible for gratuity? If so the notifications or court rulings? The rate of calculations ?
Anonymous
30 April 2011 at 22:54
Please help and let me know Sir
1. Revision of PENSION from 01-04-2001
2. Revision of FAMILY PENSION from 01-04- 2001 still now not received upto 30- 04-2011
3. Admission in SUPREME COURT ON 16-04- 2011
WHAT IS THE STATUS. BY THE GRACE OF ALMIGHTY CAN THE JUDGES SHOW COURTESY
TO OUR HARD BLOOD SERVICE SERVED TO SBI
gautam
30 April 2011 at 15:45
Sir
1> We (2007 Batch JTOs, BSNL) have been recruited in the pre-revised scale of 9850 same as JTO 2005 batch. But they(2005 Batch JTOs) are getting 21,620 starting basic. We got only 16,400. Difference is an appalling 5220. Taking 47.2% DA and 30% HRA, the difference comes to be about Rs.9250 (this is only the difference in salaries considering different starting basic). Actually after having got few increments more than us, with just 2 years more service in BSNL, they are drawing about Rs.12,000 more salary per month which is extremely demoralizing for 2007 Batch JTOs.
2> It is not only a matter of salary. It is a matter of career progression as well. We know that BSNL employees are given time bound promotion once they touch the lower end of a scale. In such a scenario with a difference in starting basic of Rs.5220, and increment of Rs.500 per year in E1 scale, we would require 11 years more to reach a level as 2005 batch JTOs. If 2005 batch JTOs touches the bottom of a scale in ‘X’ years, then we will require ‘X+11’ years of service to reach that position. Something which is absolutely unacceptable.
3> We(2007 Batch JTOs) are similarly qualified as the 2005 batch JTO or previous DR-JTO batches and have been recruited by the same mode and same organization. Same work(profile) is done by us. So such a big difference between 2005 batch JTOs and 2007 Batch JTOs are clearly de-motivating. We feel that starting basic should be same that any difference between 2007 Batch JTOs and 2005 batch JTOs should only be of annual increments and nothing else.
4> We have not found it written anywhere that fitment benefit cannot be given to executives recruited after 1.1.2007. What we have found is that fitment would surely be given to executives working in the organisation as on 1.1.2007. For other executives, giving fitment is totally in the hands of the management. Majority of JTOs of 2005 batch joined after 1.1.2007 but were given the fitment benefit. If they could get it, 2007 batch can too. (Why should not 2007 batch). The argument that they were recruited before 1.1.2007 does not stand.
Further, the fitment benefit was only for executives. It was not mandatory for non-executives. However, part of this benefit was also extended to the non-executives due to which their salaries got multiplied by a factor of 1.91. Considering that there are well over 2 lac non-executives in BSNL, the financial implications of this decision was huge. But still it was done for the benefit of the employees. So, now when it comes to the case of only a few thousand well qualified young and talented JTOs of 2k7 who have been recruited via a very tough All-india level entrances exam from among lakhs of candidates, saying that financial condition of BSNL is poor is extremely unfortunate. If BSNL could give huge benefits to over 2 lac non-executives when it was not mandatory and when financial implications were huge, then extending similar benefit to few thousand JTOs of 2k7 batch could be justified.
5> We have been recruited in the pre-revised E1A scale of 9850-250-14600. Also, recruitment orders was done before the pay revision order, 1-2-2007 for 2007 batch . The pay revision order only came out on 5-3-2009, much after recruitment orders as well as advertisement had been done for this batch. So, fitment benefit can be extended to us as our recruitment advertisements had been made well before the Date of the pay revision order—Similar to the case for 2005 batch. Also, when we have been recruited in E1A scale, then we can never be given E1 scale as under-fixation is illegal. Giving E1 with few increments also amounts to degradation of scale which cannot be done. Further, it is not necessary that if fitment is given to us, it has to be given to all JTOs in future. JTOs who will be recruited in future will be recruited according to the revised pay scale, and their recruitment orders and advertisement will be done much after the pay revision order. So, fitment can be extended to us without any future complications.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Non-payment of gratuity
I served a law firm for 5 yrs 8 m without any break, as a patent attorney.I was asked to stop work verbally, without any reason being shown in writing.I have got the PF amount, but gratuity payment has not been made.No reason for non-payment has been given so far.At least four letters from me seeking their view or the reason not yet answered.I joined at age 59 yrs 4 months and left at 63 yrs 11 months.My appointment letter did not mention gratuity or PF, but PF deduction was made all through.I was an employee (not consultant),IT Form-16 was issued regularly.Am I ENTITLED to gratuity payment?What steps can I take, if I am ? Kindly advise.