Anonymous
17 September 2011 at 16:05
I am working in a Nationalised Bank. I served my resignation on 15.01.2011. However, I had been advised by HR that due to some staff accountability issues, my resignation can not be processed at that moment. I continued serving even after expiry of 90 days (notice period) on understanding that accountability issues shall be sorted out and I will get formal relase. However, offlate on 02.09.11 I have been issued a transfer order to a rural branch (200kms) away from current metro city. I expressed my inability to relocate due to personal unavoidable circumstances. However, my request has been turned down. I have now decided to quit my service and don't wont to continue any more as its not possible for me to relocate & continue my service.
Please advise URGENTLY.
Anonymous
17 September 2011 at 11:28
Respected Seniors,
One of the Infrastructure Company received a notice from PF authorities for 7A enquiry under EPF & MP Act, 1952.
Facts of the Matter:
1. The infrastructure company engaged labour through some contractors in and around India
2. The contractors not contributed Provident Fund for their Casual Labour as they were in migrant nature.
3. Now PF authorities asked to the Infrastructures company to pay the contributions, as a principle employer both contributions and administration charges i.e., (25.61%). It may cost in Crores of Rupees
Requesting for remedy for the following Point:
If, Infrastructures Company paid all the contributions, as advised by PF authorities, but there is no beneficiaries for the above said contributions, as labours are not found due to their migrant nature. Hence, how it is justified for Infrastructure Company.
Please advise and help us...
Thanking you,
R Jagadeesh
Anonymous
16 September 2011 at 22:04
When the inquiry conducted resulted in the Inquiry Report and the same was accepted by disciplinary authority and then forwarded for II stage advice to CVO, whether the CVO after around 3 years can send back for fresh inquiry on the ground that the witnesses were not examined, that too when the charged officer did not question the witnesses statements.
The witnesses were not called for examination. The charged officer has not questioned the content of the witnesses as nothing incriminating or against the CO is stated in the said statements. the inquiry officer reported that none of the charges are proved. this was accepted by the disciplinary authority and forwarded to CVO for second stage advice. the charged officer is in service and not suspended.
Anonymous
16 September 2011 at 13:59
Dear All
I had joined a Bank on 14th June 2010 and now i have resigned from Bank as due to some medical problems.
As my CH was ready to relieve me in 10 days. But as required I have resigned from the Bank on 25th June and Relieved on last working date in Bank on 05th Sep with prior notice as per the bank's policy.
Even the Last date had been decided by Supervisor and entered in Exit management System.
Now after when more than one week has passed on i come to know about my relieving letter has been put on hold on 09th Sep without any valid reason.
Kindly look in to matter as
This can create the problems and serious issue if not resolved.
Kindly Advise on the same and waht legal action can be taken as The BM is the culprit who is not ready to give the same
as i had not good relations with him
prashant1314
16 September 2011 at 12:19
Dear Experts,
Could you please explain the meaning of i/b in below statement
A.J.Bhor i/b Mr. S.H. Ujjainwala
prashant1314
16 September 2011 at 12:16
Dear Experts,
Could you please explain the meaning of "Dasti to Counsel for the parties "
Thanks in advance.
kumarjainn
16 September 2011 at 06:53
sir
in govt. service for promotion from one grade to another grade there is procedure for Assessment interview where FCS (flexible complementary scheme ) is enforced - like in scientifci cadre.
The procedure is that after completing five years in a grade a scientist is called to appear for assessment if he satisfies certain eligibiity criteria every year till he is declared fit for promotion.
Suppose an employee is not called to appear in a interview after completing five years in a grade as he did not fulfil the eligibility criteria. Next year he satisfied the eligibility criteria and was called for assessemnt interview and he is declared fit for promotion.
Now if court orders that in the previous year he was illegally not directed to appear in the interview by following illegal eligibility criteria and be considered on the basis of review DPC.
What does this mean.
Has the employee to appear for assessment interview of previous year again. he has already been declared fit for promotion in the subsewquent years interview boardIt is not necessary he will get he same success again. No body can ensure same success in a exam or interview if he is asked to re appear in the exam or interview.
I have never heard one can sit in any exam again after he has cleared that exam. only when somebody fails in a exam then only he is allowed to appear in a exam
kindly advice what to do. should i appear in the interview or bring stay order or leave the interview and later file contempt of court case if the department does not give promotion by review DPC as mentioned in the judgement. the department feels the judge has by mistake written the word "review dpc" as we follow interview system the last years assessment can be done by following the departments procedure
thanks
Reetu Dwivedi
15 September 2011 at 23:37
Dear sirs,
I want to know what should be the policy of a company if it requires its employees work on public holidays which are not national holidays in Maharashtra and Tanilnadu.Because s & E act is not speaking about it.
Anonymous
15 September 2011 at 19:48
If there is notice period of 30 days as per Company Norms & empoyees gives a notice period of 30 days as per norms of the company & company relieve the employee after 20 days but employee is ready to work for remaining period of notice period so whehter company will pay for balance 10 days as compensation or not . If yes so kinldy give reference of cases held with judgements.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Departmental enquiry
When the inquiry conducted resulted in the Inquiry Report and the same was accepted by disciplinary authority and then forwarded for II stage advice to CVO, whether the CVO after around 3 years can send back for fresh inquiry on the ground that the witnesses were not examined, that too when the charged officer did not question the witnesses statements.
The witnesses were not called for examination. The charged officer has not questioned the content of the witnesses as nothing incriminating or against the CO is stated in the said statements. the inquiry officer reported that none of the charges are proved. this was accepted by the disciplinary authority and forwarded to CVO for second stage advice. the charged officer is in service and not suspended.