Anil Pawar
11 July 2012 at 13:54
Sir,
i was in service in one company from jan 06 to aug 11,
the company had given me appointment letter on the name of its sister compnay who is the dealer for compnay products.
the appointment letter doesnot say about PF/& Gratuity eligibility,However company is paying pf of other employee
i was not getting PF
NOw I have the experience certificate of teh company for my service period,
so i wish to apply for gratuity, can i do it
secondly, the company was giving me full payment without any break up of salary like basic/hra/da/etc for 4-1/2 year, but for the last 6 months befor my leaving they made basic and da very low, so which amount i should apply for claming gratuity
thirdly is there any gratuity application form or we have apply on plain paper
pls advice me
thanks
Anil Pawar
11 July 2012 at 13:47
Sir,
I was working with one of the BSE/NSE listed tractor company from April 1983 to march 1993,
I resigned and went abroad.therefor i couldn't settle my gratuity claim
After coming back to India, i came to know that this gratuity still due to me..
In the mean time, before last three years company was over taken by competitor,
The name of the company and its brand name,/product name is still same and company is in existence,But the managemet is different now
please advice me can i claim the gratuity now in 2012, for the period of my service 1983-1993.
Thanks
Mukesh
11 July 2012 at 08:51
Please do confirm whether the provisions of the Punjab Shops and Commercial Establishment Act are applicable to private education institutes situated in rural areas.
If yes, under which section. Please also quote any citation/notification, if any, thereon.
Prabhat
10 July 2012 at 11:35
High court has a power to stay or transfer the case to other court of Labour matter U/S 28 of wages Act. Which are currently run on Deputy Labour Commissioner Court.
The Supreme Court as well many High Court has ruled that when the charges in the criminal case and domestic enquiry are same, the domestic enquiry must be stayed .In one case FIR alone was lodged and charge sheet not yet prepared by the Police handling the criminal case.I contend that the domestic enquiry must be stayed in as much as a criminal case on the same charges is pending as FIR.Is there any specific judgment that when FIR/Criminal proceedings also is filed/pending, the domestic enquiry dealing with the same charges in the FIR must be stayed
maria
08 July 2012 at 18:18
What are the various laws that a export house has to look into India?
Sirs,
Despite the direction of the PATNA HIGH COURT by it's order dated 1.7.2011 by which the respondent corporation namely STATE FOOD CORPORATION of GOVT.OF BIHAR was directed to consider my case of promotion within two months , in the light of the gazette notification dtd 1.4.1981.by quashing the minutes of the the selection committee that the said post should be filled up by the deputationist officer from the state govt.The respondent corporation still stuck to it's earlier stand by which they have rejected my claim even when the state govt had instructed them to honor the direction of the Hon'ble PHC within the specified time.
Ag-rived by such state I moved again before the Hon'ble PHC to get it's earlier decision implemented.There are still two post Of Chief are vacant due to repatriation of the deputationist .
Though the corporation filed it's counter affidavit the court observed that the state should also defend it's stand in view of the earlier direction and observation of the court. The time for this was fixed for 2.2.12. and in the mean time the corporation was restrain to fill both the two vacant post of Chief.
Now the problem is (A) that the state govt even after expiry of the so many months of the fixed date has not filled its stand and is also not willing to file it's stand hence advised the corporation to do needful to get the court aware with the govt's stand(?) and(B) THAT the corporation is now trying to repeal the gazette notification dtd 1.4.1981.which the courts have already recognized in its earlier judgement/orders
IS THE STEP OF THE GOVT/CORPORATION ARE NOT TANTAMOUNT TO CONTEMPT OF COURT.CAN GOVT SWITCH OVER FROM ITS EARLIER STAND TO HONOR THE EARLIER JUDGMENT OF THE COURT TO COP-ORATE THE CORPORATION IN REPEALING THE NOTIFICATION WHICH WAS THE BASIS OF THE ORDER OF THE COURT -EVEN AFTER A GAP OF MORE THAN A YEAR.
The case is running on daily cause list and to be taken shortly. In the above mentioned circumstances what should be our stand -as petitioner and is there any judgement of the Apex Court in our fab-our to cite.
WITH REGARDS
DR. J.P.JHA
sir/madam i am working for a private college for last 7 yrs as lecturer managed by category 1 management can i avail gratutity for my service no where in appointment letter it is mentioned about this kindly advice me in this regard
NAYAK MAFATLAL GORDHANDAS
07 July 2012 at 16:46
Sir,
I was placed under bias/prejudice minded suspesnion from 25/11/2009.
Suspension was revocked on 06/05/2011.
I was paid subsistance allowance during suspension. Penalty is declared by the Disciplinary Authority on 26/06/2012 wherein stated that period of suspension is treated "not on duty" and so no salary and other benifits will be paid.
It is general rule that after revocation of suspension, difference of salary during suspension must be paid by the institution in which the employee work.
Please guide me in matter.
What to do to get the difference of salary of suspension period?
Want to get back money from consultent
Situation is: I have paid Rs.35,000 to a visa consultent for applying visa for canada. He told that total process time is 8-10 months. I have wait for 2 years but my application for visa is not opened by canada immigration department. So I talk with consultent and we cancel the application. He told me that he will give me total fees back that is Rs. 35,000. But he is not paying me. I am waiting since 1 year but the situation is same. We do not have any legal agreement on stamp paper but we have agreement on his latter pad that in case I fail to get visa then he will give me money back. I have paid him by cheque.
My question: Should I take legal action against him?