naveen kumar
04 July 2013 at 07:47
Dear Sir,
I have been the victim of injustice in High Court of AP
One of the PSU located at Hyderabad had sent the requisition to employment exchange for filling up the vacancies for the various posts in wage group-2 in June 2009
I came to know about the notification and requested the employment officer at exchange to sponsor my name for the same but due to labs of my seniority the officer said he can’t send my name
A group of 5 people including me approach the High court and filed a writ on basis of courts interim directions the PSU allowed appearing the written test along with sponsored candidates, qualified for practical test and I was successful in interview
My name was is selected list of candidates the results were published over the website
Subsequently I was offered for the post of junior technician in wage group 2 in offer letter with a heading ‘preliminary proposal of offer of appointment’
I accepted the offer and submitted all the required documents along with police verification certificate, medical tests certificate and I was asked get closed of the writ, in the court at the time of interim order the PSU didn’t raise any objection but after I had gone through all the test and got offer letter and submitted all the required documents along with police verification certificate
In the main final argument in the court the PSU contented that the recruitment rule No.21.1 permit only employment exchange sponsored candidates to be recruited and got dismissed the writ
At the time interim order the consul representing my side was inexperienced and filed an other mp in same wp but the interim mp was not closed
I changed my consul and filed a review petition in the review the PSU contended that it the offer letter was a mere preliminary proposal of offer of appointment. And got dismissed on pretext of recruitment rule No.21.1says
All Direct Recruitment vacancies in Wage Groups-E (WG-7) and below are to be notified to the local Employment Exchanges. Vacancies of Scientific and Technical nature in Groups-D (WG-6) & E (WG-7) should be simultaneously notified to the Central Employment Exchanges also. If the Employment Exchanges are unable to sponsor suitable candidates within the prescribed time limits, the vacancies may be advertised in the press on a local/regional basis. Where adequate number of suitable candidates are not available against local/regional advertisement, the vacancies may be advertised on All India basis
later I filed a writ appeal with 2 mp tagged the appeal was dismissed on 21 June 2010 even though my representing consul inform the court that I was an trained apprentice of same PSU relaying on apex court judgment in U.P.S.R.T.C. Vs. U.P. Parivahan Nigam Shishukhs Berozgar Sangh [1995] INSC 42 (12 January 1995 for this a trained apprentice need not be sponsored from employment exchange and recruitment rule No. 10
The recruitment rule No. 10 says GROUP-‘B’ (Revised WG-2) :
All posts in Group-‘B’ (WG-2) in the trades not provided for in Group-‘A’ (WG-1) will be filled by direct recruitment. Departmental candidates who have the requisite qualifications can also be considered for promotion/appointment to such trades in Group-‘B’ (WG-2). All things being equal departmental candidates and Apprentices trained in the Company under National Apprentices Training Scheme should be given preference.
Mean time the PSU filled up the vacancies in Nov 2009 which is much before the final out come of the writ appeal for which I came know very recently
Now I want know can I file appeal in Supreme Court now after 3 years
On following counts
1) the PSU unilaterally filled the vacancy which was offered me when writ was pending without the permission of the court
2) The PSU was well aware of that my candidature was by court why did the PSU slept and offered me a appointment and later dined on pretext of rules, even though rule No. 10 say All things being equal departmental candidates and Apprentices trained in the Company under National Apprentices Training Scheme should be given preference.
3) Why was the PSU not questioned that the rules were made much earlier the interim order passed and the time interim why PSU has not objected
Does any one see a merit in my case?
All members are requested to suggest
A STAFF OF OUR SCHOOL IS NEARING 10 YEARS OF SERVICE UNDER EPF SCHEME. SHE WANTS TO LEAVE THE SCHOOL AND WITHDRAW HER EPF AMOUNT.
SHE SAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF 10 YEARS SHE MAY NOT GET FULL AMOUNT.
HER SALARY IS RS. 15000 AND HER CONTRIBUTION IS RS.780 EVERY MONTH.
WILL THERE BE ANY TRANSFER OF HER EPF TO EPS AFTER COMPLETION OF 10 YEARS? WHAT WILL BE HER PENSION AMOUNT AFTER COMPLETION OF 10 YEARS?
IS SHE RIGHT IN HER DECISION TO QUIT BEFORE TEN YEARS?. WILL SHE GET FULL AMOUNT OF EPF AFTER 10 YEARS?
MOHAMED FIROZ
gopal singh
03 July 2013 at 17:32
  we 110 in service candidates have filed civil writ in high court against govt of rajasthan for some major issues in our probation period rules. We have 2 year probation period while our counterparts on same post have 1 year probation. i am just curious if going to court is indisciplinary??? can the govt terminate of our service (we are 110 petitoners ) just based on thefact that we moved to court for our problems as the government was not listening to our plea from more than 1 year.(we went to govt 6 times for our problems but govt didnt responded) i m quite anxious . plz reply with AUTHENTIC responce.
Pankaj
03 July 2013 at 17:20
Dear sir,
I m Pankaj from guwahati assam.I want to know the main point and term & condition about government pension scheme.
My brother is law was working as a government permanent employee as a panchayat secretary in a GP under nagaon district in the state of assam.he was death on April,2009 due to lever desease. but after his death my siter have not got any pension money till to date even no compassionate appointment provided by the department.
Actually My brother is law was working since 1991 under any government scheme but granted by the govt during 2005 to 2006.
we went and tried several time to get the pension or any compassionate appointment but we are not success.
what will i do.
please provide me some suggestion
sunil
03 July 2013 at 14:54
Respected lawyers,
Myself sunil and i am working in a public sector bank as an assistant and presently preparing for bank po and central govt. job.I want to know that at the time of resigning should i have to take proper resigning letter or only my written resignation to my branch manager is sufficient if i have not mentioned anything to my next psu to whom i am going to join.
Some days ago i went to my RO and there the hr dept staff told that don't mention anything about your new job while resigning and told me to resign for personal reason.Is the the correct procedure to resign and will HO accept my resignaton.
So many questions in my mind please help me your best sir.
Thank you.
RamakrishnaReddy
03 July 2013 at 13:40
please clarify my doubt on gratuity eligibility,
I have joined in my previous company on 08-09-2008 and left the company on 07.03.2013 my total service is 4.6yrs, as per my appointment order i need to serve three months notice period but i have served one month notice period after that company has recovered balance two months salary in my final Settlement after deducting of my notice period amount my total service is 4.8 yrs, so please clarify whether i am eligible for gratuity?
Ramakrishna
perminder singh
03 July 2013 at 09:43
Sir
I must apologise first for how I am messed up with my previous query due to my ignorance.
Sir, kindly clarify if on shifting from central govt to state govt with a technical resignation I am appointed with an appointment letter as a fresh candidate with no mention of my previous service and a specific mention of lower pay, does it quash my eligibility for pay protection.
With regards
Dr. Perminder Singh
perminder singh
03 July 2013 at 08:16
Sir
Are those under New pension scheme eligible for gratuity after completion of five years of regular service.
With regards
Dr. Perminder Singh
kaur
02 July 2013 at 20:45
Do charitable Hospital comes under Industry Act. PF/EPF is deducted and employee is permanent.
Superannuation benefits
My company has provided superannuation benefits but has put a condition that it is applicable only when i complete 6 yrs of service.
Should they not allow me to atleast transfer the superannuation (presently maintained with LIC) to another organisation if not withdrawal
the company shows superannuation as part of my annual CTC and would be claiming tax benefits (i assume that)
is it fair
thanks