abbas
27 July 2015 at 12:36
My father retired from U.P Jal Nigam in 2008.Due to his prolonged illness he could not get his gratuity released and expired last year. Can I get his gratuity released now?
Also tell what sum of gratuity will be due to him and will it be governed by 6th pay commission?
Anonymous
26 July 2015 at 21:36
We 25 people approached CAT ernakulam bench for seeking regularisation of our service (department already decided to frame a scheme for regularisation of casuals and communicated to all the stations to send the details of casuals) on the basis of department's eralier movent. Many times department wanted time to complete the procedure, but there was no positive action from the department, moreover dept.issued an thtoffer letter(order) stating that we are processing the said scheme and after the completion of the scheme your matter shall be taken up. But after many moths there was no resultn again we approached cat and court directed to the department that the scheme should be completed within an outer limit of 6 months. After 6 . months therewas no result from dept and again we filed a contempt of court aair.in cat and they wanted again more timetime to complete these process. Again court issued contept notice to dept. Now the dept stating that the order issued to the25 people was an erroneouss misatake by the department at the time of preparing the reply to these 25 people. But cat rejected the review petionbfiled by dept and contempted again. Now dept
Approached high court and obtained stay for the order issued by the cat. Now they mentioned erronous error mistake can be rectfy in the light of sahai case of supreme court. Any can send the details of sahai case related this issue or case number. How can wea vacat stay and how to full fill our aim. Please help us.
Thanking you
Aa group of casuals seeking regularisation working more than 18 to 25 years in all india radio.
sakthi
26 July 2015 at 21:30
I am facing a criminal case filed by CBI under Prevention of Corruption Act. My son is applying for Civil Service Examination. Does my case be impediment to join my son as IAS, in case I found guilty in the criminal case? How far my son eligibility of appointment in Government Services may affect because of the criminal case pending against me. Kindly clarify
V.N.K. MENON
26 July 2015 at 17:28
Reference my earlier query with regard to direction by Apex Court to High Court to expedite early hearing application which H/Court earlier rejected.
As experts opinion, I approached concerned registrar of H/C in writing detailing briefly alongwith SLP copy. registrar directed me to Registrar General and from his office obtained acknowledgement. Now they asked me to file in the filing counter in the regular form, i.e. Index, affidavit etc.
Now my doubt is along with urgent memo, notice of motion, memo of parties, list of dates & events, certificate whether I should make a routine application for early hearing supported by affidavit. Any other matter which Ld. experts feel will be of use.
Anonymous
26 July 2015 at 11:53
Sir I am engineer and working with private limited company which provides IT related sevecises to public limited company.I am working with this company since last more than 10 years.This year my annual offer letter was kept on hold for 1.5 month .During this period i contacted my compay HR and asked the reason for keeping offer letter on hold but HR told that she also dont know the reason and HR from public limited company where we actually work will directly communicate to me.I also contacted my appriser and seniers but they also told the same reason.I keep trying to contact every person of both company but not got the proper reason.Suddenly my company called me to office and told that public limited company where we actually work rejected my annual offer letter.Company issued me termination letter giving one month notice and giving reason as performance and conduct.Neither my company nor the company where I work has given me opportunity to explain my side.please guide me what can be done in this case.
Anonymous
26 July 2015 at 11:49
Sir I am engineer and working with private limited company which provides IT related sevecises to public limited company.I am working with this company since last more than 10 years.This year my annual offer letter was kept on hold for 1.5 month .During this period i contacted my compay HR and asked the reason for keeping offer letter on hold but HR told that she also dont know the reason and HR from public limited company where we actually work will directly communicate to me.I also contacted my appriser and seniers but they also told the same reason.I keep trying to contact every person of both company but not got the proper reason.Suddenly my company called me to office and told that public limited company where we actually work rejected my annual offer letter.Company issued me termination letter giving one month notice and giving reason as performance and conduct.Neither my company nor the company where I work has given me opportunity to explain my side.please guide me what can be done in this case.
vittal
26 July 2015 at 07:17
Sir,
this is with refrence to the recent news that 7th CPC is recommanding 33years of service / 60 years which ever is earlier as the retirement criteria. Pl provide me clarification if possible.
I have joined at the age of 19 in DAE and rendered 15 years of service before giving technical resignation in 1997-98. This has completely cutoff my service from govt( I am getting prorata pension, graduity is settled and EL till that date have been encashed) and new NPCIL (A Govt of India enterprise ) service started.The offer book of NPCIL says superannuation is on attaining 60 years. I am having another 7 years and 9 months left for my superannuation.NPCIL is expected to implement the 7 CPC pay scale to us as well . Now the question is how the above rule said to be proposed by 7 CPC will affect employees like me ( I have completed 18 years of service in NPCIL already) so total service will be 33 years as on date
denis
25 July 2015 at 12:44
Sir,
Please let me know what the due date of PF Annual e_return file is? & which form to be submitted in annual return & How to be file annual return with format
Sunny
25 July 2015 at 00:46
I am working as Asst Administrative officer in LIC India.
While joing, I had signed a Surety bond for Rs 2 lacs for minimum service period of 4 years.
Now after completing 1 year of service, I wish to resign from the job, since I have got a better job.
I would like to know that whether such a bond is legally valid and enforceable.
Isn't such a bond VOID as per section 27 of contract act.
Please throw some light on the issue with legal provisions and cases.
Please reply asap.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Deemed sealed cover procedure & reversion
An Officer, who was serving as Assistant Commissioner, was promoted as Deputy Commissioner on ad-hoc basis with effect from 1.8.2013.
The Departmental Promotion Committee for regular promotion to the same post met during July 2014. The Officer has been the senior most of the two officers in the one of consideration. Five posts of Deputy Commissioner were vacant.
The promotions, as recommended, were approved by the Minister in the last week of July. However, the said officer was placed under suspension pending disciplinary proceedings on 1/8/2014.
On the other hand, the other officer (who also was promoted on ad-hoc basis with effect from 1/8/2013) was promoted as Deputy Commissioner on regular basis on the same date.
The suspension was not continued beyond three months, no charge-sheet was issued but the suspension was revoked on 1/11/2014 and on the same date the officer was transferred in the capacity of Deputy Commissioner to another place and he has been functioning in that capacity.
However, on 21/7/2015 he has been reverted as Assistant Commissioner stating that the recommendations of the DPC in his case is deemed to have been kept in the sealed cover.
Till date no charge-sheet has been issued.
In the light of the facts, can the reversion be judicious and in accordance with the extant norms? What are the grounds on which he can seek judicial remedy?