Sidharth
15 September 2010 at 13:18
Dear Gentlemen,
Can you pls let me know about the following citation under the Shops & Establishment Act.
{1977 LIC Noc 159, ILR (1978)2 mad 200:1960 I APLJ 360}
Regards
Sidharth
Sidharth
15 September 2010 at 12:53
Dear Gentlemen,
Can you pls enlight me whether the shop & establishment act is applicable for the labour contractor who depute / deploy manpower at principal employer premises. The principal employer is already having the S & E regd for that location. But as per the labour inspector, since the contractor generating business from the deployment of manpower the contractor also must have to take the S&E regd for the same location & same prmises where the principal employer already took the same regd. Kindly through your views with concrete evidence for the above matter.
Regards
Sidharth
Niranjan Parida
15 September 2010 at 11:21
We are in the process of starting up an in house contact centre wherein initially some 12 – 15 employees will be placed and the office timing will be from 7.30 AM to 9.30 PM with each employee working for 08 hours strictly. Since their work profile is different , can we have different policies for different class of employees ? whether any Statutory Law is against implementing different policies?
nitin pratap singh
15 September 2010 at 10:33
dear sir
my query is about interpretation of the order of supreme court on malik mazhar sultan regarding appointment of civil judges (junior division).
sir if the advertisement for recruitment for civil judges junior division has been given under malik mazhar sultan and about 54 candidates have been given appointment as per malik mazhar sultan AND NO STATUTORY RULE APPLIED WHILE GIVING APPOINTMENT EARLIER.
the query is if malik mazhar has been applied to give appointment in the recruitment CAN STATUTORY SERVICE RULES OVERRULE MALIK MAZHAR OR CAN BOTH MALIK MAZHAR AND STATUTORY RULES BE APPLIED AT THE SAME TIME? WHEN THE OTHER CANDIDATES IN MERIT LIST HAVE FILED CWP FOR APPOINTMENT.WHO HAVE BEEN DENIED EARLIER DESPITE CREATED AND UNFORSEEN,ANTICIPATED VACANCIES BEING AVAILABLE BEFORE PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR RECT. CIVIL JUDGES JUNIOR DIVISION.
Anonymous
15 September 2010 at 00:00
HI SIR,
I have been serving in a municipal corporation as a permanent employee since 10 yrs in full pay grade.
Before 3 months, this muni. corporation published an ad. For an upper level post. In that salary was fixed-pay for 3 yr. and than full pay offered.
I passed written exam, interview and selected for that post.
Though I am 10 yr old employee of this muni. corporation, they are giving me fix pay.
By this fix pay, I am loosing Rs.6000/- pm. as compared to pay of my previous post.
Though I am 10 yr old employee of this muni. corporation, they are counting my new post as a new job, and so i am loosing my old pension scheme.[/u]
so, my question is :
(1)Can i get full pay for my new higher post, or can i get pay protection (pay of my old post) during probation?
(2)Can my old job period be counted continue for pension scheme?
Mugundhan
14 September 2010 at 18:24
Dear Experts, Under what circumstances, dismissal of a worker without holding a domestic enquiry is justified?
Anonymous
14 September 2010 at 16:05
My father is a retired teacher from NHPC. He got retired in Oct 2009. However he doesnot know if sixth pay commission applies on him also. And if it applies, what is the process to get it initiated.
Thanks.
aranganathan
13 September 2010 at 22:25
respected sir
please give me the supreme court citations or any other references for the following
if the foundational fact is not proved in a departmental inquiry. but the inquiry officer finding is on the preponderance and probability . is it right as per law or not ?
how to weigh the preponderance and probability in a departmental inquiry.
if the basic fact was not proved then the inquiry officer said in the departmental inquiry that it was proved on preponderance and probability . is it right as per law or not
aranganathan
aranganathan
13 September 2010 at 22:16
if the foundational fact is not proved in a departmental inquiry. but the inquiry officer finding is on the preponderance and probability . is it right as per law or not ?
aranganathan
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Dues payable to a removed bank officer
Dear All,
I joined Punjab National Bank as an officer and rose up to senior manager (scale III). I was removed from bank service with following punishment:
"Removal from bank service which shall not be a disqualification for further employment."
I want to know what are the dues payable to me. I put in 21 years in bank service and opted for pension.
I shall be grateful for the reply? Thanks in advance.