Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   26 February 2019 at 17:42

Issue of Experience Certificate

I have been working in defence PSU for 3 years and I want to apply in other central govt post through UPSC but it requires a experience stating nature and domain of duties served in current post I am holding. So I asked my company for experience certificate as per UPSC requirment but they have given me certificate only the for duration I have served and told me that they can not issue certificate stating nature and domain as it is not their policy.
My question is can they do that legally??

Madan   26 February 2019 at 14:20

Overtime hours allowed

What were the overtime limits in factories in 2016 onwards. What is the current limit.

Advocate Rajamahendra Varma P   26 February 2019 at 12:13

Inputs required to file workmen compensation case

Hello everyone,
Can anyone help me on the below case process details please..

1. How much Workmen Compensation an injured person can get for partial disability (Age : 40 years, Working as Driver for APSRTC, Monthly salary 30K, already in service of 6 years and the balance service period is 18 Years).

2. Jurisdiction to file workmen compensation case in rural area where labor court not existing. Can we file case anywhere in India in any labour court?

3. Where/how to claim Third Party accident claim for the above case? How much claim we can get? Any specific jurisdiction to file the case?

Thanks in advance for your kind suggestions..!!

Vasudevan   25 February 2019 at 19:03

Ccs pension rules

This is continuation of my earlier query. I had been made compulsorily retired from service in Jan 2017 and subsequently convicted in criminal proceedings in Jun 2017. I have not been paid with any pension or gratuity till date. Recently I got a show cause notice from the Competent Authority why my pension not to be withheld forty percent for a period of seven years. I had replied for the same. In the order of Compulsory Retirement, there is no mention on the quantum of pension. However, in the show cause notice, they had mentioned the conviction order of the criminal court. I had not been paid provisional pension as required under Rule 69 of CCS Pension. Now I am thinking of filing a case before CAT bench for release of provisional pension. Whether they can now increase the limit of 40 percent adversely against me. Whether the Disciplinary Authority can now pass an order under Rule 40 of CCS Pension based on the Compulsory Retirement order. Please give your opinion. Thanks in advance to all the Learned Experts.

suneetha Jain   25 February 2019 at 12:11

No counter by bank

Sir, I have filed a case in high court against a Bank for illegal termination in 2018. But, till now, the Bank has not filed Counter. Now, What should I do to settle the case at the earliest??

RAJESH CHOPRA   24 February 2019 at 20:54

Bank service matters expert

Dear Sir's

I need a good service matters expert (especially in Pvt Sector Bank Services) to handle a case in Uttar Pradesh . The jurisdiction would be Noida , Meerut , Lucknow or Allahabad (if matter filed directly in HC)

Please suggest
Thanks

Anonymous   24 February 2019 at 20:50

Can State do this?

Can State commission form it's own eligibility for becoming eligible for a post by picking some part from state policy (sports) and reject others (who are in sports policy)
In short:
*State uploads advertisement for judicial posts
* Give 3 seats to ESP (eligible sports person)
* Shows only Grade A and Grade B gradation certificate conditions by referring State sports policy
* But state sports policy includes Grade C and Grade D persons and as per definition of ESP in state policy all (A B C D) are ESP
*As per definition C and D grade persons are ESP but as per Advertisement they are not eligible because in advertisement it is not shown
*Now whether state can only allow A and B grade persons to be eligible on the other hand no where in Advertisement it is written that C and D grade persons are not eligible

Anonymous   23 February 2019 at 14:36

Whether a group A post or not

Is Civil Judge (Junior Division) in the cadre of Haryana Civil
Service (Judicial Branch) a Group A post?

Anonymous   23 February 2019 at 07:36

Vigilance Clearance for release for deputation

I am a Group A officer. I was being released for deputation but vigilance clearance has been with held after receipt of a letter from previous department where I was on deputation, saying that a case for minor panelty has been recommended to CVC for first stage advice. What can I do?

Anonymous   23 February 2019 at 02:43

Sports policy partially adopted for giving reservation

Sir in judicial posts
Advertisement comes with 3 posts for ESP I.e Eligible sports person
Eligibility as per definition of ESP was sports person to be played at national level for state and Sports Gradation of Grade A and Grade B is shown in advertisement by saying that it comes under state policy of 2018
But the policy of 2018 has 4 grades A B C D( All grades level on decreased order I.e Olympics (A) to National school games (D) )
In the advertisement the eligible sports tournaments shown in 9 categories deals with Grade A and B
But in the state sports policy there are 13 categories ....9 to 13 deal with grade C and D which was not shown in advertisement
Also the sports policy says Grade A person can apply for Group A posts but Grade B can only apply for posts other than Group A
Now a person who is ESP as per definition of ESP having Grade D is not eligible for appearing in main exam by saying that your gradation is not as per advertisement I.e where C and D are not discussed
Note: No where in Advertisement it is written that Grade A and Grade B are allowed
No where in Advertisement it is written Grade C and Grade D are not allowed
It is mere presumption that A and B are allowed because Grade A and B are discussed in advertisement and only 9 categories of sports are discussed which only deals with Grade A and B
...

...

Now is not this discrimination with Grade C and D candidates who are not eligible but Grade B is allowed for ESP
And whether advertisement for recruitment in judicial posts can surpass the sports policy as the facts itself shows that by allowing Grade B eligible for Group A posts along with Grade A is pic and choose from the sports policy ( Also 9 categories of sports tournaments shown and only Grade A and B is discussed besides the fact that there are 13 categories and grade C and D are also there)
Whether the state can form there own eligibility for ESP by getting some part from the state sports policy And ignore the other