Anonymous
25 August 2011 at 18:37
The employer had filed recall application against the ex- parte award of the labour court without mentioning the act under which the recall application had been filed not by the party but by the authorized representative of the company simple plain paper without affidavit and without delay condone application after 30 days of publication.
However it is pertinent to mention here that the award is not ex-parte as the company has filed w/s, rejoinder affidavit, refused to file documents ad absented itself deliberately in management witness and arguments. It has also filed various interlocutory applications/ objections rejected before passing award under the direction of high court to decide the issue at earliest.
Now challenging before the writ court the award, the recall application which was rejected under the state act while the reference order is in the central act.
Is this issue will have any serious implication in the writ court?
How this issue should be argued before the writ court?
Is there any ruling in support of submission.
Let me know.
Anonymous
25 August 2011 at 17:59
R/s,
company was wind up in which i was appointed. on filing form 19 to epf office, they returned with objection that official liquidator's sign not attest. but sign of Bank manager duly attested.Please help.
atul
25 August 2011 at 14:39
Sir
We are regt. under MSME SSI unit, now we want to file case for those buyer who don't pay payment even after 365 days, need your guidance for same and Micro & Small Enterprises Facilitation Council will help us? need address of gujarat office
tnx
Anonymous
25 August 2011 at 11:37
R/s, I asked query about form 19 of EPF, whom signature to be attested. IN reply, Mr. S.Ganesan, Advocate Rajkumarlaxman,Mr. PS Dhingra,CEO, Dhingra Group and Mr. Prabhakar Singh have given their valuable experts advise. Thanks for it.
In addition to that, company was wind up in which i was appointed. on filing form 19 to epf office, they returned with objection that official liquidator's sign not attest. but sign of Bank manager duly attested.Please help.
Anonymous
25 August 2011 at 09:16
I work as an Inspector(Grp-B officer) in Central Government and am 5 months pregnant at present . I am suffering from various prenatal complications in my pregnancy . I applied for leave with MC on 3.8.2011 (MC by AMA)and next day onwards i.e.4.8.2011 , there was a strike called by Group C & D employees' union. Due to severe problems I could not travel to office I was assigned charge ,which was 150 Km away from my HQ.On persistant requests also higher officers didnot pay heed to my genuine request and also didnot convey me any message in this regard till today i.e.24.8.2011. On 3.8.2011 , I was admitted to a private hospital and doctor has adviced me to be on continued bed rest for another 15 days i.e. from 18.8.2011 onwards again.
Now, my post has been relocated to another city and I am directed to immediately shift the office and attend duty failing which office will consider entire period as unauthorized absence apart from disciplinary action.
At present , It is nowhere possible for me to shift my location due to my husband being posted in same city ,my home being here and my first child to be just two years old. Also, no much medical facilities are available in that city.
Please tell ,
1.
is there any rule which abide my office to have at least intimated me or should have corresponded me regarding denial /approval of leave?
2. Is there any deadline for leave saanctioning authority to ask for second medical opinion?
3. Even on timely submission of documents and genuine problem am I liable for unauthorized absence or disciplinary action ?
Please guide and help
I'm a school principal at Vadodara, Gujarat. I want to know whether a teacher of our private/unaided primary school who was appointed on 14/06/1968 and retired on 19/01/1999 ,is eligible to get Gratuity ? and If he is eligible then form which year is he eligible to get the payment of Gratuity? as the Central Govt. amended in the bill No 109 on 12/11/2009
noor
24 August 2011 at 21:51
author : noor
Posted On
24 August 2011
i am respondent in high court and court direct the petitioner to suspension order to comply 17(b) where as i file mp in lower court after 8 years and same my case is pendig before high court i file mp in labour court where court direct me to file ep itis correct procedure tell meit is very urgent
Anonymous
24 August 2011 at 19:53
I am an Engineer working in port of cochin(Govt establishment) .I am employed on contract basis .My employment contract terms and conditions says my salary will be same as regular(permanent) engineers &
if there is any increment in salary of regular(permanent) engineers the same increment will be given to me.When new pay commision was implemented there was a hike in the salary of pemanent engineers,but me being a contract engineer was not given the hike .After a lot of writing to the management they hiked my salary to the same level as pemanent engineers but it took almost 6.5 months but without any arrears.So I have asked 9wrote a letter)for arrears which they have not given me.Why didnt they give me arrears?Are they not supposed to pay it as per my terms and conditions?What should I do if they dont pay me my arrears?
Anonymous
24 August 2011 at 19:09
i have being appointed for a post of staff nurse(regular permanent post)in GB pant new delhi .explain me during my probation period i come under which employee 1 permanent employee 2 temporary employee 3 quasi employee. explain in detail with some evidence.
Urgent help please ---resignation from mail when employee was on leave
A employee was on leave duly sanctioned.
while on leave his father dies in an rail accident.he could not inform the office for further leave.
Meanwhile company called him and asked for his resignation he told the reasons.
But than somebody in his office sent a mail of resignation from his office mail ID.
Resignation accepted. Full and final sent home.
Employee launched FIr and complaints with labour offiice. employee has phone recordings when he was asked to resign on phone.
Case is pending with labour court for evidence.
Please experts help what evidence should be given in labour court and how can we win this case?