Rahul
12 May 2016 at 16:02
Sir or Madam,
I am working in a company and our boss sold out it to another company. Then whose rule and regulation applicable in the takeover company and if new company sIGN the old company employee signature in increment letter whose include term and condition for employee and employer.then which company term and condittion apply in old company employees.
Sonu Goyal
12 May 2016 at 11:32
Sir i am working in consumer forum, mansa and i want to change my department and want to go to another department. can i go to another department through proper channel. i want to go to judicial department from consumer forum. i am on regular post and working from july 2015.
Mehak Khanna
12 May 2016 at 11:06
Temporary worker is employed in our Company-service industry for 2 months-
1) Will he be entitled to benefits such as ESI & PF? If yes, can he challenge his termination of service after expiry of his period of appointment viz. 2 months?
2) How many leaves shall he be entitled for these 2 months?
Dear experts
A few days ago I had already sought the advise on this topic. But, as I had not explained the facts and circumstances of my case, I could not get effective guidance by the experts.
My case is that I was absent from duty as on the date of enforcement of revised pay rules and retired from duty during my unauthorised absence period. Departmental authorities had accorded me the sanction for fixing my pay in revised scale and the payment of retiral benefits computed based thereupon.
The Pay and Accounts Officer, suo moto and unilaterally, has authorised my pensionary benefits taking into account the actual pay drawn by me, immediately before the date of commencement of my absence, in the old scale.
In a similar case the HC had quashed the action of the PAO and upheld the sanction of Department. The Division Bench of the HC too had confirmed the judgement of the Single Bench. The entire benefits, as per the departmental sanction, were paid the petitioner in that case upon his filing Contempt Petition. As such, I had requested the PAO for revising my Pensionary Benefits by extending the benefit of the judgement of the HC which covers my case from all four corners. But, PAO had informed me that as it is decided to file SLP before the SC against the judgement and order of the HC I cannot be extended the benefit thereof.
Now, the operation of the judgement and order impugned by the PAO in the SLP filed by him came to be stayed by the SC I am adversely affected by the Interim Order of the SC.
Therefore, experts may kindly advise me as to whether I may become intervener in the said SLP.
manav
11 May 2016 at 22:36
Persons selected for post on contract didn't get required marks in written and interview as per policy of recruitment. 50 marks were required but no body got more than 41 marks. Also they were regularised just after one year. We were regularly appointed after three months of their regularization. Can we claim and will be granted seniority above them.
Member (Account Deleted)
11 May 2016 at 10:52
Hello,
I'm a permanent teacher in Delhi government school,employed since 5 years.
I'm facing several health issues and want to apply for EOL(Extraordinary Ordinary Leave) for 1 month on medical grounds.I'm under the treatment of a homeopath.I can't go to a MBBS doctor as allopathic drugs do not suit me.
I very well know that the medical certificates of homeopaths are allowed in case of medical leaves.
However I wish to know,if the govt department accepts medical certificates of homeopaths to grant EOL on medical ground.
Please advise urgently..
Thanks..
Jayendra chunara
10 May 2016 at 22:51
Dear sir
Our union leader is workmen director of our bank
I am clerk and working since 3 years in remote area and my batchmates have already transferr4to their preferred places i have noticed that our union leader interfere too much in transfer related matters and make management do what he wants
I want to know whether i can oppose him ? And if yes what precautions i have to take to fight with management and union as i hve got injustices in every manner ....
Dhaval
10 May 2016 at 17:20
Let me introduce myself first, my name is Dhaval patel earlier I was in arise solution (a recruitment firm/agency) I had worked for 11 months in this company as a HR Recruiter/Recruitment Executive. i have been associated with this from 12 Jan 2015 to 27 Nov 2015.My LWD was 27 Nov 15. I left this organization due to some personal issue without serving notice period of 45 days. Now according to them I am absconded from the company and I will not be able to get any PF and other benefits. In the month December only i was having conversation with Mr Niraj From Arise Solution first he told me that you can consult with PF office directly and I am not bounded to help you regarding your PF.
Before ten day I visited PF office at ahmedabad they told me that I have to submit forms to PF O office with the sign of my last employer post this I had visited arise solution but again they told me you have to pay to the company amount of 34 days as you had not served notice period. I told them I was not having situation where I can serve notice period but they clearly denied me that until and unless you will not pay this much of amount of 34 days I will not sign this form you can go anywhere where you can.
Now the concern is this my CTC was 13500 per month and PF amount is near by 3000, so if I have to pay near about 15000 to get 3000 its not feasible for me
As they have not send me any letter of warning nor for absconding and according to me if any employee is not responding then and then only you can declare him as a abscond and you can not declare him without sending any show cause notice or warning letter.
Employees compensation act,1923
Sub sec d of sec 2 of Employees Compensation Act,1923 states who are the dependants of the deceased employee.Under clause (iii),certain category of persons are stated as dependants.My doubt is as under.In a given case where the woman employee died left no child and husband also predeceased.The parents of the husband/brothers and sisters of deceased husband are no more. The Tahsildar has given a II class legal heir certificate in favour of sons/daughters of brother of the deceased women where the brother of deceased woman already expired. Further, the deceased woman employee was living with the son of the deceased brother of her during the time when the accident occurred Whether as per the definition of dependants in Sub sec d of sec 2 of Employees Compensation Act,1923, the legal heirs can be considered as dependants of the deceased woman employee. If so the relevant decision/amendment may be furnished