Alok Kumar Sharma
19 September 2009 at 21:11
My clients were working in a factory which was illegally closed down by the employer. Subsequently, State Govt. granted permission to close down with retrospective effect. They were directed to be reinstated with full back wages. Employer has challenged the order before High Court taking a plea that factory is closed. Will my clients be entitled to get the last drawn wages u/s 17 B or not?riven
Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate
18 September 2009 at 17:32
sorry frineds but i m repeting my query
friends,
my client was working in a factory as store incharge from last 15 yrs.
there r two stors r in that fectory.
unit-1,&unit-2.
my client was posted on unit-1 and a theft was commited on unit-2.
there is no relation of unit-1's store incharge with unit-2.
case of theft was ragisterd in to the police station,
police call to all store incharges for investigation and when police investigate that my client has no fault then leave them and other incharge was arrested in to the theft and send him jail.
on next day when my client was went to his job then a notice was affix on the gate of the factory that my client has been terminated by the job because he is highly involve in the theft and he has more assets then income!
however both alligations are falls nither my clinet involeved in the theft (because original accused have been arrested by the police)nor my client has any assets except a normal house made in 100 meters by bank lone .
so,what is the remedy of my client to get their job with respect.
is there any remedy in high court?riven
Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate
18 September 2009 at 13:49
friends,
my client was working in a factory as store incharge from last 15 yrs.
there r two stors r in that fectory.
unit-1,&unit-2.
my client was posted on unit-1 and a theft was commited on unit-2.
there is no relation of unit-1's store incharge with unit-2.
case of theft was ragisterd in to the police station,
police call to all store incharges for investigation and when police investigate that my client has no fault then leave them and other incharge was arrested in to the theft and send him jail.
on next day when my client was went to his job then a notice was affix on the gate of the factory that my client has been terminated by the job because he is highly involve in the theft and he has more assets then income!
however both alligations are falls nither my clinet involeved in the theft (because original accused have been arrested by the police)nor my client has any assets except a normal house made in 100 meters by bank lone .
so,what is the remedy of my client to get their job with respect.riven
anshul sangal
18 September 2009 at 13:39
Please define what is continuous service under section 2A of gratuity actriven
ravikant
17 September 2009 at 20:42
order authority shops and establishment act
can be executed under 33c(2)I.D. act ??
please,give reply with sightations__>>>>
jitendra sharma
17 September 2009 at 19:59
I am the son of a tisco employ. My father service in tata steel, jamshedpur about 41 years. my name is registered in tisco for employment for the basis of my father service serve. but till now tisco not call me for service. my father is long serviceman. accoring to privious tisco rule tisco hadbeen appoint a son of long serviceman for service in tisco.
sir I want to know can I get service in tisco for service. I am a graduate. please suggest me about this.riven
jitendra sharma
17 September 2009 at 19:54
I am the son of a tisco employ. My father service in tata steel, jamshedpur about 41 years. my name is registered in tisco for employment for the basis of my father service serve. but till now tisco not call me for service. my father is long serviceman. accoring to privious tisco rule tisco hadbeen appoint a son of long serviceman for service in tisco.
sir I want to know can I get service in tisco for service. I am a graduate. please suggest me about this.riven
harish adake
17 September 2009 at 10:55
my client had resigned from central railway after 8 years of qualifying service. the railway administration had refused to pay any gratuity to him.
whether he is entitled to any gratuity as per the provisions of Railway services pension rules,1993. if yes, then then under what provision.riven
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Labour Retirement Benefits
A judgement is passed in favour of the employer in a case filed by an employee against the employer in Division Bench. On appeal by the employee , single judge in High Court has given judgement in favour of the employee . But on appeal by the employer, bench having 2 high court judges, passed judgement in favour of the employer giving reason that the single judge either not taken into view the earlier judgement passed by the division bench or not referred the case for larger bench in case of disagreement with the judgement by dn bench. Whether this is correct ? Pl give yr views.riven