Amit Goyal
21 April 2010 at 00:49
If offence is commitec under sec. 376 of IPC by a juvenile and the application of prosecution for DNA of accused has dismissed from the juvenile court... further the prosecution has filed a revision petition againt such order.. what is the defence for accused? any Supreme court authority against this revision or in favour of accused? plz suggest. thanks indeed
Anonymous
20 April 2010 at 17:08
Dear Experts, Please let me know the Episode Involved after Wife Files False Complaint u/s498A , what happens to the Husband & Family if they are not Interested in Anticipatory Bail? What are the Episodes involved in such a scenario if someone is ready to face it Boldly without shying away from arrests(I want to know what happens in the PS and their after?
Anonymous
20 April 2010 at 13:56
Dear Experts,Please Let me know what is Impugned Order?
Anonymous
19 April 2010 at 19:03
My father met with an accident and was in coma for 3yrs,in dec,2008 he passed away with no will. We were always a nuclear family (2 daughters) & got no support from my dad's family. my mother had applied for a successon certificate but the court also wants my grandmother to testify, but she would put an objection. she is financialy independant and owns a house in U.P.
Please advise if there is a way to contest the court's decision regarding my grandmother's NOC.
Hoping to get a positive reply soon.
Regards
Anonymous
19 April 2010 at 17:57
Hi,
I am going to marry a guy who's divorce case is on under porcess.
He got married with the girl who is not physically fit for marriage. That girl lived with him for 40days only. then she went to her parent's house and didnt come back til now. After one year of marriage date he filled a divorce case. When the case will be over.
Is there any other way to finish off the case soon?
He married on Sep - 2008,Filled case on Sep- 2009.
Pls help to find a solution
Anonymous
19 April 2010 at 14:27
Dear Experts, Please tell me What is the Difference Between Suit Dismissal and Suit Withdrawal?
Y Hari Hara Nath Babu
19 April 2010 at 14:13
Dear Sir,
3. It is submitted that my clienti.e., Balakrishna is only son of Radhakrishna Reddy and Hymavathi of Kondayapalem of Nellore. Whileso that the father of my client and his mother in the year 2007 expressed their intention to celebrate the marriage of my client to their friends & relatives requesting them to choose a bride from an agricultural family with minimum education and also expressed that they do not need any dowry in consideration marriage of their son.
It is humbly that while the search for bride is in force during the year 2007 that the Respondent’s parents and her relatives along with Gattamaneni Sudhakar Naidu approached my client’s family at Vedayapalem on 25-11-2007 and represented that respondent is the daughter of Kalluru Sreedevi and Kalluru Madhusudhan Reddy studying Intermediate at Naidupet attained Puberty and willing to offer respondent for marriage to this Petitioner. That the Respondent’s parents and relatives namely Kalluru Madhusudhan Reddy, Manda Srinivasulu Reddy, P. Syamalamma and P. Devasena, had also represented that the respondent is a healthy, fully grown up girl for marriage, suitable to the Petitioner’s family and invited the Petitioner and his family members to visit their residence at Naidupet. Accordingly the Petitioner and his family members and one G.Sudhakar Naidu visited the respondent’s house at the request of respondent’s parents and relatives the family members of respondent. Respondent’s Parents and relatives were also present during that Occasion. Thus all respondent’s relatives including her parents represented prior to the fixing off the marriage that all of them brought up respondent with more love and affection since respondent is the only daughter of Madusudhan reddy and Sreedevi.
6. It is submitted that the respondent also expressed her desire and consented to marry this Petitioner at the desire and abetment of Respondent’s Parents and relatives. The Petitioner and his family members consented for celebrating marriage at Naidupet. The marriage was celebrated on 23-4-2008 at Naidupet as per the Hindu rites and customs. Though Respondent’s Parents and relatives agreed to bear marriage expenses but expressed their inability to meet the expenses of Pujari and musical players on the occasion of marriage. That Petitioner’s family borns these expenses with happily without expressing any dissent in whatsoever manner. Respondent’s Parents and relatives supervised the celebrations of the marriage of Respondent actively on 23-4-2008. That the Petitioner’s father borne part of expenses of the marriage. That neither this Petitioner nor his family members never demanded any dowry from Respondent’s family.
7. It is submitted that after the marriage respondent joined the house at Kondayapalem in Nellore city on 24-4-2008. The marriage was not consummated as respondent expressed her unwillingness for consummation on health grounds. That this Petitioner waited for two months even after marriage without any consummation and thereafter that he suffered with Jaundice consequently the consummation of marriage was postponed for further period of four months. During the month of October, 2008 that this Petitioner expressed his desire for consummation of marriage with respondent but petitioner observed the nervous feelings of the respondent and oppressed his desire seeing the condition of the respondent.
8. It is submitted that on 21-10-2008 that this Petitioner and his mother and sister had taken respondent for medical examination at Nellore. To the surprise of Doctors and to this Petitioner that Respondent is lack of Primary sexual organs like uterus, ovaries besides accompanied with blind vagina which made her unfit for consummation of marriage much less even for procreation of children. That respondent misrepresented even on 21-10-2008 that she attained puberty subjected to monthly cycles for all these years. That Respondent’s Parents and relatives tutored Respondent to lie each and every occasion regarding her perfection in respect menstrual cycles. That Respondent misrepresented at the house of the Petitioner during her stay for a period of six or eight months that she was subjected menstruation.
9. It is humbly submitted that blind vagina and in the absence of Ovaries there would no Harmonal secretions in Respondent’s body which prevents penetration and in such situation that respondent is unfit for matrimonial life besides for procuring children. The doctor subjected the Respondent to scanning test in doctor p.v.ramachandra reddy peoples’s Poly clinic in the department Ultra Sonography at Nellore and the scanning report bearing No.20080008234 Dt.21-10-2008 is herewith annexed with this petition. The scanning report corroborates the findings of the Doctors besides contradict the versions of Respondent and her parents. Thus Respondent and her parents besides her relatives played a deception against the Petitioner and his family members by misrepresenting that she attained puberty and also subjected to monthly period cycles which resulted marriage of this Petitioner and thereby Petitioner suffered mental injury and damage to his reputation. Hence the deception of Respondent and parents induced the Petitioner and his family members to consent for the marriage on 23-4-2008 and the same caused much loss and pain and the same amounts to cheating. That Respondent and her parents are fully aware about the factum off absence of primary sexual organs in the body of Respondent and knowing fully well that they played deception in misrepresenting the petitioner by inducement which caused the petitioner for consenting the marriage with Respondent.
10. It is submitted that the Petitioner further submits that respondent left the house of the petitioner at Nellore on 31-10-2008 on her own volition and joined her parents. That the respondent’s parents and relatives are again conspired together with respondent and abetted her and to give a false complaint against this Petitioner, his father and mother that she was subjected dowry harassment during her stay at Nellore to SHO, Ozili Police station, Sri Pottisriramulu Nellore District. Apprehending arrest from the S.H.O, Ozili Police station, Sri Pottisriramulu Nellore District that this Petitioner and his father and mother obtained Anticipatory Bail in Crmp No.1291 of 2008 on the file of Sessions court, Nellore. Dowry harassment news regarding the complaint given by Respondent to S.H.O Ozili, was widely published in Surya Daily Newspaper in Nellore city & District. This caused damage to the Petitioner’s family reputation which lowered down the image of Petitioner and his family in the eye of public as well as friends and relatives of this Petitioner. Thus the conduct of the Respondent is nothing short of defaming of the family reputation of this Petitioner. The Petitioner’s and his family was subjected to great humiliation in the society for no fault of them. That the marriage is voidable as the marriage contravening the provisions Sec.5 (ii) (b) of Hindu Marriage Act and would not give confer any rights to Respondent against this Petitioner and his family members.
please give which type of suggestion to file case against the case
bala
18 April 2010 at 22:39
sir i have a doubt pls clarify me. Mother purchases a property it is partitioned among her and his two sons. Now one of her son died intestate leaving his wife and two minor sons. My doubt is whether now the mother can file a suit for partition claiming right over the property of the deceased son?
Anonymous
18 April 2010 at 22:26
I have been married for 5 years,and have been suffering as my husband is abusive,alcoholic,and physically violent.I want to know the grounds on which i should apply for divorce.Secondly my marriage is registered in Pune,but i live in mumbai.My husband is also currently residing in Mumbai.Therefore can i file for divorce in Mumbai?
thanks
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Burden of proof for emotional violence
when a girl goes to her matrimonial home & suffers domestic violence continuously, how she can prove all these while lodging a case for the same? After all, she never went to the matrimonial home for the purpose of gathering proofs against her agony. She is doing this only when the violence crosses limits. How can she think of proofs and evidence in her agony?