Geetanjali
08 November 2010 at 23:14
My husband filed a divorce petition in 2003.He got a divorce in 2008 in the trial court.I appealed against the judgement in the high court and the case is pending in the high court.The court put a stay to his remarriage.I am staying in my parents house since our separation in 2003 along with my son and my husband is staying with his mother in the house which belonged to my late father-in-law and which he has given to his daughter vide a registered will.Of late,my husband has remarried but from what i could gather from some common friends,they have secretly married and as such there is no proof or evidence of the marriage.He is openly moving out with this lady and is telling everyone that he is in a living relationship with this female.He has even conveyed it to me that i can do whatever was possible and he wont come to any settlement now as his purpose of remarriage has been solved.My question is,in the absence of any proof of his remarriage,can he be punished for bigamy and contempt of court.Can i move into his house under Domestic violence act just to make his life miserable.can numerous pictures of his with his 2nd wife on many functions prove anything.I'm just confused and just seeking the advice before i take some action.Thanks everyone who are interested to give me advice.
Anonymous
08 November 2010 at 14:09
Hi, i wanted to find out, what can a husband do if his wife harasses him mentally, by emotinal blackmail.
Is there any legal recourse that a husband can take. the wife is using their only daughter as a weapon for emotional blackmail. if the husband leaves her, he may not see the daughter again. he is living in this constant fear and is unable to look after his own health or career, and tolerating the wife. marraige councelling has helped neither of them. what kind of alimony are we looking at?
raahat
08 November 2010 at 11:08
WIFE OF YOUNGER SON FILED A CASE u/S 498-
A/406 IPC AGAINST THE WHOLE FAMILY AND CLAIMED IN THE PROPERTY WHICH WAS PURCHASED BY THE PARENTS OF THE HUSBUND IN THE NAME OF THEIR ELDER SON MUCH BEFORE THE BIRTH OF YOUNGER SON.PARENTS OF THE HUSBAND DIED. THE WIFE CLAIMING THE PROPERTY AS ANCESTRAL AND ASKING FOR THE SHARE IN THE ABOVE MENTIONED PROPERTY.
1. CAN A WIFE OF YOUNGER BROTHER CALIM HER HUSBAND SHARE IN THE SAID PROPERTY ?
raahat
08 November 2010 at 10:57
CAN A WIFE OF YOUNGER SON CLAIM IN THE PROPERTY WHICH WAS BOUGHT BY THE FATHER'S OF HUSBAND IN HIS ELDER SON NAME ?
Anonymous
08 November 2010 at 10:28
I want to ask question does daughter-in-law has rights to cliam on father-in-law property if it is his self owned and her husband is alive and not intrested and not claiming on the property? All are hindu religion
Anonymous
08 November 2010 at 06:57
while a property dispute is pending in india, wife obtains an exparte divorce from abroad although marriage solemnized in india.
is it valid in india and is there any way to challenge in the court granting the divorce.
Ramakrishnan.V
08 November 2010 at 06:11
It was discussed about a few years back what is the forum of appeal for decrees passed by a court under the Hindu Marriage Act of 1956. It has been stated of now, the legislators have settled the dispute that the forum of appeal is only High Court, which is not by direct statement but by implications. Can anyone clarify me this aspect by which legislation it has been done?
Ramakrishnan.V
Anonymous
08 November 2010 at 05:29
What is the importance og mangal sutra in Hindu Marriage Act.
Is there any reference in the act.
Please confirm.
Thanks
Ramakrishnan.V
07 November 2010 at 02:46
Whether the Maintenance and Enforcement Orders Act of 1921 ousts the Family court's jurisdiction under section 125 of Cr.P.C if the husband is a non resident Indian and the effect of the order is to be executed abroad with which India has mutual agreement. The country is also a common law country. Any one can clarify me?
Ramakrishnan.V
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Religion and the child
Dear Experts,
In the following case I would be most thankful to have your opinions:
Mother is Hindu, father is a Christian. Both are non practitioners. Child was baptised. Child also never practiced any religion. Child grows up both at home and in school on the tenets of humanism. Child has now attained the age of 16 years. There is a divorce case now pending in the court. If at all the issue comes up with the court regarding custody of the child, how far the religion of the child would be considered, especially when in another 2 years the child may decide to give up the formal tag of institutional religion. Would the child be given opportunity to voice his view that he cannot suddenly come into the fold of any religion as his upbringing hitherto has been on the basis of respect for all religions, follower of none and embracing the goodness of what is called universal human principles.
Your opinion would educate me as well as concerned parents and would remove the anxiety of the child that he would be suddenly pushed into the fold of a particular religion which he is clear would make him very unhappy. Being 16 years of age, goes without saying the child is at a crucial stage of his educational mile stone.
Many thanks in advance to all of you for sparing your valuable time for this query.