Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

ramesh gupta   01 September 2011 at 11:38

13 c

NAMASKAR ALL THE MEMBERS

WHO CAN TAKE THE DIVORCE U/S 13 C OF HMA

Anonymous   01 September 2011 at 08:36

Please help!

Dear Experts


Thank you for your valuable time which you would be spending in answering this query.

Kind regards,

Anonymous   01 September 2011 at 07:43

Black mailing

Respected sir

I am married blessed with two female children. They are grown up now. 10 years back I was introduced a women aged 20 years as a prostitute. she continued her relation with me, every month I used to pay her maintenance. She is staying saperatly near by her parents. She is uneducated.My family photos,and photos I took with her are the proofs she is holding with her.Now she started blackmailing me by holding the photos,she is demanding Rs.1.00 Lack as a compensation otherwise she will show the proofs to my family member and neighbours by which I have to loose my reputation.Please help me in giving good suggestion in the above matter.

Anonymous   01 September 2011 at 07:30

Cheated and refused to marry

Respected madam,

A 20 years girl resides at Chinthal has fallen in love with a boy who
resides at New Nallkunta at work place.They are in love since 1 year
and the girl strongly believed the boy and lost every thing. When she
demands for marriage the boy refused and the issue placed in front of
the boy parents, even they are against to perform the marriage, and
more over they wants to pay compensation, whereas the girl intends to
get married with the boy only, or she has to suscite her self, hence
we request you to kindly give your valuable suggestion to save the
girl.

Thanks and regards,

Md. basha

kuldeep kumar   01 September 2011 at 06:47

Guardians power

pls explain the extent of guardian power(hindu law) with ref to undivided property.

MANOJ NAYYAR   01 September 2011 at 00:11

My rights

I am member of my joint family. The joint family consists of my grandfather, grandmother, father( being the eldest child ), mother, my younger sister+ 2 uncles ( younger to my father ) and 2 aunts - bua ( younger to my father, again - My father being the eldest). The entire business was handled by my father, uncles and Grandfather. My father expired in 1979. My chachi (married to my youngest uncle) expired in 1995 leaving behind my uncle and their three children. I got married in 1997 against the wishes of my family at the age of 19-1/2. My marriage was not accpeted by my family and I was not allowed to connect back inspite of my best effort. was Then my grandmother expired in 1997. Then my granfather expired in 2003 or 2004 ( I do not know as I was not informed).Then my elder aunt died in an accident and leaving behind her husband, 2 daughters. The my elder uncle
( middle one) also expired. He never married.

My uncle who is now the sole major male member of the family has old me that my grandfather had given everything to my cousin ( my uncle's son) by will.

My Grandfather owns quite some property, houses, agricultural land etc. My question is :

1) What is my right as a grandchild of my grandfather ?
2) I do not think that my grandfather would have left nothing for his granddaughter effectively meaning nothing for his eldest son.
3) I have now received summons relinquishing my rights for property of my uncle ( the middle one who did not marry).

Kindly guide me as to what will become of my mothers right and mine.

Brijesh Goyal   31 August 2011 at 22:33

Reply of sec 24 hma

Dear sir,
As my lawer says no need to present compromise u/s 24 (maintanance aske by wife )with divorce-HMA.
we have presented compromise u/s 498A&406,125 crpc and 13B.
-Then why not for u/s24,should it not be presented for safer side.
-u/s 125 crpc, why my lawer has not mentioned the word"for life" towards lumpsum maintanance/alimony mentioned in sec 125 crpc and 13B.for clearity.
pls advise.
thanks

Anonymous   31 August 2011 at 19:47

Hindu succession act 2005

ALL RESPECTED MEMBERS OF THIS SOCIETY I WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS THE FOLLOWING PROBLEM PLZ SUGGEST ME YOUR BEST OPINION.

A was married in the year in 1980. After giving birth of two daughters namely B & C his wife had died. A remarried with consent of his other family members and his second wife gave birth 3 daughters and all are minors till date. Marriage of B and C were arranged by her father. After marriage and before marriage both daughters are happy with their parents. After that B`s husband obtain fraudly signature of his wife`s father on blank paper because his father in law is very simple and uneducated and little-bit mental disturb. when B`s father came BACK his home he told the whole story to his brothers. he moved a application to S.P.(police) regarding the said incident.

after passing two days he executed a releases deed of his ancestral property in favor of his second wife for the wale-fare of his minor daughters and C has no objection regarding the said deed.

but when B came to know that her father executed a release deed in favor of her step-mother she challanged the said releases deed for the share 1/7 share.

now my question is that can is B entitled to get 1/7 share in ancestral property because she is not a coparcener now and her marrige also done much prior 2005 amendment in Hindu Succession Act 2005.

Or if she is not entitled plz tell me case law.
THANKU

Knowledge Gainer   31 August 2011 at 19:44

Engagement during divorce case

From the facebook husband came to know that his wife has an engagement. Wife who has filed divorce case against husband has uploaded her engagement photos on the facebook. Wife is under impression that she will definitely get divorce within one year so no question of going back to him and she can know the guy better after engagement till divorce and after divorce she can immediately marry that guy.

Husband's query is that mere engagement is crime? if yes than under which section and what remedy husband has?

Anonymous   31 August 2011 at 17:13

Roll of witness in the registered will

Dear Experts, While executing a registered Will, two witness sign the Will. After the death of testator if one or both the witness says that they have not signed the will. Then what will be the consequences.Whether the "WILL" will be treated as null and void?