Anonymous
08 January 2012 at 20:04
hi
sorry for incomplete info from my side.
actually its my first hearing in that case what should i do ?can i get bandra court transferred to thane court before the date 11th jan or i have to attend first date.plz advice
Anonymous
08 January 2012 at 19:35
hii
my husband has filed petition at bandra family court .he could file near by but delebrately he has done so becz he knows i will be very uncomfortable as i am having med problems .
i want to take ur advice ..
whether i can get the bandra court changed to thane court on basis of medical grounds .i m having all med prescriptions n advices.
thnx n regards
Anonymous
08 January 2012 at 19:24
if the girl has not voluntarily signed on the mutual consent evidence petition then can the boys lawyer amend the petition to original divorce petition
if yes what is the probable time limit for the divorce decree to be granted as the original divorce petition was filed in Dec 2008
are there any other legal solutions for obtaining a divorce decree otherwise or foe ex parte settlement if the girl/ girls lawyer does not appear in court of law
if the gilrs maintenance petition once having been rejected can still be contested on the sane grounds if the girl files a maintenance petition again
Member (Account Deleted)
08 January 2012 at 18:15
sir/md.,
thank you to spare some of your valuable time to give guidance for my family issue as below :
my son had married on feb.'11 [his marriage is {10} TEN month old.]
his wife went to her parental home on
i] 31st oct.'11 on pretext to come on fri./sat. but didn't come. we personally went there on 13th nov.'11 to bring in.
ii] again on 5th dec.'11 she went to see her parent and and told to return on thursday but still won't come on pretext of her illness. her parent not in a position to say what illness ?
they [her parent] threaten us if we say anything against them, they immediate file/impose u/s 498A Cr.P.C. on us.
what is the remedy to counter the suit file under 498A Cr.P.C.
her relative also said that you [we] don't understand the meaning of not phoning from their side and not give your phone to girl.
moreover her parent on one pretext to other see that we don't meet their daughter on phone & personally and at the same time don't give even slight inlklin about their intention for DIVORCE. we don.t understand what is in their mind ?
thanking you in anticipation of taking trouble to guide us.
grishma.
[ grish.guddi@yahoo.com ]
Anonymous
08 January 2012 at 18:13
can the girl after filing an affidavit for mutual consent refuse to sign the evidence affidavit in the court of law suddenly creating an imaginary dispute which never existed in the mutual consent petition till the stage of evidence?
also till now if the girl has not filed any affidavit as regards the nature of the dispute in court, what are the options for the boys lawyer in court to speed up the divorce petition as the mutual consent petition has yet not been disposed
the girl had filed for maintainenace claiming to be a housewife while she was gainfully employed.
can any legal action be taken for this false affidavit
Anonymous
08 January 2012 at 17:36
there is a situation please guide me:-
a RCR filed, notice issued, respondent(wife) along with reply an application u/s. 24 of HMA filed, reply of application filed by the petitioner(husband, date fixed for argument on the application u/s 24, Court asked for compromise, wife willing to go with husband, when asked to husbands advocate, he said that husband is in jail. but in fact husband was present in the court but advocate of respondent and respondent also unaware about this fact. thus a clear cut lie was spoken by the advocate of petitioner in the court.
what to do now?
dr.pawan rajyan
08 January 2012 at 15:32
RESPECTED SIR ,what is DIR ?... in D.V. ACT. what is all consists of... regards
Deepa Bhasin
08 January 2012 at 14:57
The Union of India enacted ‘ The protection of women from Domestic Violence Act 2005’ with an object to provide for more effective protection of the rights of women guaranteed under the Constitution who are victims of violence of any kind occurring within the family & for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. The Act came into force through out India on 13.09.2005.
Karunadu is a welfare state in the Union of India & Kalyan nagar is a district within the state of Karnataka.
Respondent No 2 Ramesh is the resident of Kalyan nagar He is a software engineer by profession getting a handsome salary of Rs: 1 lakh pm. With his earnings respondent
No:2 purchased a house at Kalyan nagar, In the year 2008 he married the petitioner Soubhagya who too is a software-engineer by profession and earning hand some salary of Rs: 80,000/- pm. They lived happily for about six months in said house at Kalyan nagar. Thereafter differences cropped between them resulting in the petitioner being subject to domestic violence by respondent -No:2 & finally he was driven out of his house by the respondent No2
Petitioner Soubhagya filed an application in the Court of JMFC, Kalyan nagar under section 12 of The protection of women from Domestic violence Act 2005, alleging that she has been subjected to domestic violence by the respondent No:2 & interalia sought following reliefs
i) restraining or prohibiting the respondent No:2 from operating bank lockers & bank accounts held singly by him, (U/s 18(e))
ii) restraining the respondent from alienating or disposing,off or renouncing his rights in the shared house hold or encumbering the same situated at Kalyan nagar, owned by the respondent No:2 (U/s 19 (d)& (e))
iii) directing the respondent No:2 to remove himself from the above shared house hold (U/s 19 (b))
iv) monetary relief of providing her maintenance by the respondent No:2. (U/s 20 (d)).
The respondent No: 2 opposed the application on the grounds that shared house hold and the bank lockers & accounts are his self acquired properties & petitioner has no right /title over it. She is even not entitled for maintenance as she is able to maintain herself with her handsome salary. The respondent No:2 further contended that having regard to relief s sought against him, the application of the petitioner against him is not sustainable in view of section 36 of The protection of women from Domestic violence Act 2005.
The learned JMFC, Kalyan nagar upholding the contentions of the respondent No 2 {with the reasoning that petitioner’s relief’s of restraint are untenable as under the Hindu Law
the respondent No:2 is the absolute owner of his self acquired properties and under Hindu Law and also under 125 CrPC the petitioner is not entitled to maintenance as she is able to maintain her self } rejects the application of the petitioner.
Being aggrieved by the same the petitioner challenges the constitutional validity of section 36 of The protection of women from Domestic violence Act 2005, in the High Court of Karunadu, contending that said section 36 is violative of article 15(3) of the constitution of Indian & the said section nullifies the entire Act & therefore is unreasonable. Its constitution validity is also challenged on the ground that retaining said section creates two classes among women itself.
(Before the Hon’ble High Court the respondent No:2 remains absent.)
Issues raised
1) Whether section 36 of Domestic violence act is ultra vires to Article 15 (3) of the constitution of India.
2) Whether section 36 of Domestic violence act is against the objective of the said act and other sections of the said act, If so can it be held ultra vires of the constitution.
3) Whether section 36 is discriminatory among woman having regard to the object to the act and is thereby voilative of article 14 of the constitution of India.
Anonymous
08 January 2012 at 12:05
hello lci experts,
i need your expert opinion on below standstill.
myself victim of 100% false 498a case filed on me/my mother/my 02 relatives, after which i filed for divorce and fortunately with all correct informations and facts the honourable district court verdicted for divorce decree (with one time alimony announcement for wife and my 6 year old son). this is fine and i will respect the honourable courts judgement to the best of my capacity.
coming back to the 498a case, now i know and have proofs of this being a 100% false case forced on me. now what options i have to counter this...
my specific question is:
- can i go for quashing this case in the higher court (high court), if so what are the steps (is there a process of mediation in high court when i request for quashing / stay)
- as the case is opened and i am not appearing in the trial (as i think the case has to go for the stay/quashing - for being a false one), do i stand / apprehend a chance of arrest to appear in the trial.
kindly advise.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Maiden name in will
My maiden name-Petsy Fernandes, I got married in 2009 & changed name to Priya Desai. Its inter caste marriage & dad was really upset, but now he is fine. & bow making his will where he will include my maiden name coz he is not aware of name change. Should I tell him this change or should I wait for his will & then try to change name in it? PLz guide me. aCTUALLY I DONT WANNA TELL HIM, COZ HE MIGHT AGAin get upset.