Anonymous
08 August 2010 at 09:18
hello Advocates,
on time of cognizance complainant presence in the court is must or not. if not provide me any ruling.
Anonymous
08 August 2010 at 08:29
Its over 5 years now that criminal case (after depositing blank cheques) u/s.138 N.I.Act has been filed against me the complainantis a leading international bank which has failed to attend proceedings regularly and also failed to produce evidence against me is there any remedy.
Thanks
imteyaz farooquee
08 August 2010 at 07:41
is 324 IPC bailable or non-bailable,compoundable or non-compoundable ? It is amended in Cr.P.C amendment 2005 and enforced on 31.12.09 by the Central Government ,but here at Bihar, the criminal court does not act so as the Bihar government does not confirm it ? my question is that if the Bihar government does not implement it, then this section will be bailable or compoundable ?
Vikash yadav
07 August 2010 at 23:11
A person knowingly issued a cheque with wrong signature and take a loan from his friend. now, he malafidly not returning the amount and the banker has written the cheque with remark "signature differ" please guide and also provide drafting,if any available.
Thanks
vikash
Vikash yadav
07 August 2010 at 22:47
A person knowingly issued a cheque with wrong signature and take a loan from his friend. now, he malafidly not returning the amount and the banker has written the cheque with remark "signature differ" please guide and also provide drafting,if any available.
Thanks
vikash
Vikash yadav
07 August 2010 at 22:45
A person knowingly issued a cheque with wrong signature and take a loan from his friend. now, he malafidly not returning the amount and the banker has written the cheque with remark "signature differ" please guide and also provide drafting,if any available.
Thanks
vikash
Member (Account Deleted)
07 August 2010 at 21:15
My parents took a arresting stay in a 498A case filed by my wife and I am on a regular bail.The arrest stay is valid upto September and the chargesheet has not yet been filed.
what should be our time of applying for a regular bail as the arrest stay from Allahabad court is subject to mediation centre clause and would expire in september.
The bail need to be applied in the lower court and if its rejected than can be applied with district magistrate. At the time on the day of my arrest when my bail was applied with lower court it was rejected as the lawyer had told me in advance the lower court do not grant bail in these sections 406, 3/4 dowry prohibition act and 498A and its likely to be rejected than later I got bail from DM.
I have a question will my parents also not get bail from the lower court and will it be rejected or this happens with the main accused only.
Please help with answers the case is subject to UP Jurisdiction.
Anonymous
07 August 2010 at 01:30
Tell me what is the difference between these two ,if there is any ?
VIJAY K. TEOTIA
06 August 2010 at 21:59
A got FIR registered through 156(3) against B,C and D u/s 420/120B etc. subsequently due to circumtances, A recorded his statement under 161 releiving B from accusations and also gave affidavit to B to assure him that his name is cleared. however investigation will go on against B and C. What will be the implications
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
438 CRPC ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN SC ST CASES
Sir
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION u/s 438 CRPC [SC ST CASES UNDER [POA] ACT, is being dismissed by Most of the District Courts in Andhra Pradesh, though there are several Judgments of different High Courts granting anticipatory bail where CIVI DISPUTE IS INVOLVED. Why this is being happened in only Andhra Pradesh?