Anonymous
09 August 2010 at 09:27
Pre charge evidence in complaint case under Sec 200 CrPC. Complainant/witness during cross examination jumping out of the context to the asked question has filed fresh documents. No application to submit these documents had been made by him and neither the copy supplied to the accused. There has also been no reference of these documents in compliant or even during cross-examination. Judge has further exhibited these documents.
What are the options open
Anonymous
09 August 2010 at 05:14
Expert Arvind Adv in this column has sugested for citations. May someone help me in getting the title name of these citations.
BOM- Cr.L.J.-1996-365,368.
SC-NCC-2009-897.
NCC-2008-UTT-313-SC’s Rulings
NCC-2007-UTT-815.
Cr.L.J.2000-Mad-624.
Anonymous
08 August 2010 at 21:39
Respected learned friends,
What are the consequences of false allegation and consequently lodging of FIR?
What consequences/reciprocations can be brought against the false complainant/FIR lodger so as to give a befitting reply?
Anonymous
08 August 2010 at 21:33
I want to know wether the consumption of liquor more than 75ml as per the procedure prescribed by the crpc is not offence what are the judgements avialble to me
Anonymous
08 August 2010 at 17:46
May someone help me getting title of these citations. Sorry to extra bother you but please...
BOM- Cr.L.J.-1996-365,368.
SC-NCC-2009-897.
NCC-2008-UTT-313-SC’s Rulings
NCC-2007-UTT-815.
Cr.L.J.2000-Mad-624.
Anonymous
08 August 2010 at 16:35
is the bail is possible if the prosecutrix statement is not recorded in court hearing kindly refer any sc and high court judgement where bail is granted
Anonymous
08 August 2010 at 16:18
what is the meaning of recently sexually assault it means 1 hour , one day or one week plz also refer any sc or high court judgement
Anonymous
08 August 2010 at 16:11
is the bail is possible if the prosecutrix statement not recorded in the court hearing
Anonymous
08 August 2010 at 16:10
'A' a 2009-10 passed Law Graduate has just enrolled himself as an Advocate with Bar Council of Delhi. As per BCI's recently announced rule, a Law Graduate who passed LL.B. in 2009-10 has to pass the Bar Examination to be held on 05 December 2010 and only after passing this Exam he can practise Law . 'A'has no source of income and as per this BCI's rule he can't practise law till passing the Bar Exam. 'A' has no other source of income .'B'( mother of 'A) a widow and getting family pension ( after the death of her husband) from one of the public corporations of Govt.of India to the tune of Rs. 7,000.00 ( seven thousand) per month.
'B' has filed complaint against her son 'A' U/S 125 for maintenance by claiming that she doesn't have any source of income while 'A' is having evidence that 'B' is getting pension from the Govt.
What would be the fate of this case.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Exhibiting inadmissible documents
Pre charge evidence in complaint case under Sec 200 CrPC. Accused is appearing in person. Complainant/witness during cross examination jumping out of the context to the asked question has filed fresh documents. No application to submit these documents had been made by him and neither the copy supplied to the accused. There has also been no reference of these documents in compliant or even during cross-examination. Although the accused in this case, has objected to inclusion of these documents at this stage in this manner, the judge has not written 'objected-to' while admiting these documents. Judge has further exhibited these documents while they ought to be inadmissible.
What are the remedies/options open to the accused.