Anonymous
07 September 2010 at 18:43
IF ANY ADVOCATE IS AN ACCUSED IN A STATE CASE AND ANOTHER ADVOCATE IS COMPLAINANT IN THAT STATE CASE,THEN WORDS 'SH.' AND 'ADVOCATE' WILL BE WRITTEN BEFORE AND AFTER RESPECTVILY IN ATTENDENCE OF ANY OF THEM IN COURT'S FILE OR NOT.PLEASE DO GIVE REPLY WITH RULLINGS.
Anonymous
07 September 2010 at 18:38
IF AN ADVOCATE IS AN ACCUSED IN A STATE CASE,THEN WORDS 'SH.' AND 'ADVOCATE' WILL BE WRITTEN BEFORE AND AFTER RESPECTVILY IN HIS ATTENDENCE IN COURT'S FILE OR NOT.PLEASE DO GIVE REPLY WITH RULLINGS.
Anonymous
07 September 2010 at 18:35
IF AN ADVOCATE IS AN ACCUSEC IN A STATE CASE,THEN WORDS 'SH.' AND 'ADVOCATE' WILL BE WRITTEN BEFORE AND AFTER RESPECTVILY IN HIS ATTENDENCE IN COURT'S FILE OR NOT.PLEASE DO GIVE REPLY WITH RULLINGS.
Anonymous
07 September 2010 at 17:17
IN PROTEST PETITION WHEN THE DEFACTO COMPLAINANT'S PRESENCE IS REQUIRED BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE ?
vinod bansal
07 September 2010 at 16:15
R/Experts
In my complaint u/s 138 of 138 NI Act,accused never come present before court and ultimately find no other way after NBW and proceedings u/s 82/83 Crpc,court declarte him proclaimed offender and it was also mentioned in the order that copy of this order be also sent to SHO Police station for further proceedings of 174 A IPC,I dont know whether copy was sent to police or not,now i have sent a RTI to Police asking that how many times police had raided at the house of accused to arrest him and why police has not registered FIR u/s 174 A IPC against accused (PO)but police has replied me that being pvt complaint they are not supposed to /bound to register FIR. 174A IPC.Police is right or wrong in this situation.Whether it is relevent for registration of FIR that case should be a State case not pvt crl complaint.Kindly advice.Thanx
Anonymous
07 September 2010 at 08:00
i ve opened an account in 2008 but account closed now. so the security cheque i ve given to the bank against my loan can be used to bounce even after my bank account is closed and file a case of section 138. please answer...
Anonymous
06 September 2010 at 21:55
A CHEQUE WAS DISHONORED AND THE PAYEE SENDS A LEGAL NOTICE ( THROUGH ITS ADVOCATE ) TO THE PERSON WHOSE CHEQUE WAS DISHONORED BUT THE NOTICE WHICH WAS SEND WAS NOT ON THE ADVOCATES PAD AND ON THAT NOTICE NUMBER ALLOTTED TO ADVOCATE WAS ALSO NOT MENTIONED. A COMPLAINT WAS REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I.ACT. CAN IT BE QUASHED ON ABOVE BASIS ?PLEASE PROVIDE CITATION ALSO IF THERE IS ANY.
Sultan Salauddin Khan
06 September 2010 at 15:47
a police officer denied to take FIR, SP also didn't take action positively, The victim applied to THE Chief Judicial Magistrate for registeration of FIR u/s 156(3) of CrPC. the CJM rejected the prayer. What remedy left for the victim.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
onus on Highcourt Bench to go throuch merit of case
Is essential or mandatory for high court bench to go through merit of case before dismissing Interlocutory application for condonation of delay in filing appeal against
aquittal?.
Will it not amount to accepting or
admitting the appeal under sec 378(4) of cr
pc 1973?
Is there any citation of SCI upholding decision of High court bench order
dismissing SLP against Highcourt judgment
not condoning the delay?