Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate
12 March 2011 at 14:50
respected all,
can anybody post full judgment of Lal Kamlendra pratap singh v/s state of u.p.
sir,
full judgment needed.
i hv the citetion.
Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate
12 March 2011 at 14:47
respected all,
can anybody post full judgment of AMRAWATI AND ANOTHER V/S STATE OF U.P.
sir,
full judgment needed.
i hv the citetion.
nikhil singh
12 March 2011 at 13:27
Can anybody provide me the Judgment of Supreme Court of India or Punjab & Haryana HIgh Court on permanent exsumption U/s 317 Cr.Pc from appreance of accused in Criminal case. I want to exsumpted my clients appearance on each date. In this case i am relying upon two grounds
1.Distance
2. Expenses
Any other ground on which i can rely upon please let me know.
Anonymous
12 March 2011 at 12:16
Dear Experts,
In Newspaper it appeared that
"I.T. Bagaria, Khan's lawyer, said the ED 'was given a chance by the court to produce evidence but there is a difference between material and evidence'. 'What the ED has produced is only material, they have not been able to produce any evidence to prove Khan guilty."
Now my query is
What is difference between Material and Evidence.
Thanks in advance.
Anonymous
12 March 2011 at 11:46
RM of a company filed a 420,409 case against manager.warrant has been release and paper statement as well.where manager is innocent.how can he save himself from dis issue.some say no other way other than pay de money?plez advice...
Anonymous
12 March 2011 at 11:41
A process is issued u/s 138 , trial is yet to start . No evidence given by complainant. Just moves an application for adding of section 420 of IPC. Trial court allows the application. Revision filed , what arguments can be taken in the revision.
Anonymous
12 March 2011 at 02:13
What is the remedy when a district court judge decides the case on the lines of case of 2005 which was about the anticipatory bail be given in exceptional case only where as the latest decision of the Hon'ble Supreme court of india is to grant bail to avoid police harrassment etc as per The Hindu dated 12.06.2010
srinivasp
11 March 2011 at 19:59
sir please kindly send 379 and 411 ipc sitations infavour of accused. how to cross-examination of 411 ipc.
thanking you sir.
Anonymous
11 March 2011 at 19:04
I am the complainant had filed 138 case 10 years ago. The accused has admitted the signature on the cheque in question but disputed that the contents are filled by me, hence the cheque may be send to handwriting expert. While the fact is that the contents were already filled when the accused handed over the said cheque to me. we oppose the above application. Hence I required the citations in this regard, because already the accused has prolong the trial for 10 years. Please help me.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
As per CrPC
In on One of Client's 498a case
Police did not follow agaisnt Accused[husband]
Is it not mandatory by POLICE to follow the CrPC under follwoing sections
164, 191, 281,
and they did not shown FORM NO 7 and comeplled the accused to come to PS
Please enlighten in this regard