Arvind Singh Chauhan
18 August 2011 at 07:40
Sir,
whether 156(3) Cr.P.C. is maintainable against the chairman of a registered society by third person who is not a member of society ?
While According the societies registration Act only registrar has right to proceed against a registered society.
james
17 August 2011 at 21:32
during the trial,police is conducting further investigation.Intimation given to the court.Accused filed objections on the intimation and wants to hear on the report.Is it permissible or legally entitled? support your answer with rulings
Anonymous
17 August 2011 at 21:05
Dear All,
ek din ek admi ne mujhe TVI Express ka business plan join karne ke liye bola aur lubhavne plan aur khud ki income dikhakar mujhe plan kharidne ke liye ready kar liya. maine aur mere anya mitro ne usme lagbhag 3-5 lac Rs. invest kar diya lekin us person ne hamare dwara di gayi rakam ko is prakar se invest kiya ki kewal uski ID's ko hi fayda pahunche... baki sabhi log khali rah gaye.. ab vah kahta hai ki aur logo se invest karwao to apki income shuru ho jayegi otherwise to bhul jao... isme police kya madad kar sakti hai.. haan ek baat hai sab kaam uske computer se hi hua hai & hamse amount cash lekar Axis Bank main company ke account main jama karaya gaya hai.. kya company bhi iske liye doshi hai.. aur kis dhara main...
Legal_Query
17 August 2011 at 19:11
Dear All,
a partnership firm issued a cheque which got bounced. a notice was sent u/s 138 ni act, in which the name of the firm was written wrongly as xyz group instead of xyz enterprises. notice was recieved and duly replied stating that they donot have any concern with the said firm and the said cheque was issued by their firm xyz enterprises. one month notice period had elapsed what recourse can be availed in such circumstances apart from again bouncing the cheque. can an addendum be sent citing typo error.
kindly respond urgently.
thnks in anticipation
Adv. Virendra
17 August 2011 at 18:02
When a JMFC grants or denies bail to an accused or extends his police custody or gives magisterial custody, whether such act amounts to - the court taking cognizance of the offence?
pls. clarify
Anonymous
17 August 2011 at 17:41
Hi,
I have been working for a firm in Blr. I and few of my colleagues joined this firm in Apr 2011. Since then the company has not been paid salary. we were deployed at Mum and not paid salary since employment. Please advice on the same and future course of action.
Also, the employer is threatening civil or criminal actions cause we have been following up with him since last 2 months.
Plz advice
Regards
Sam
jai Prakash Joshi
17 August 2011 at 14:38
Respected Sir,
Peanding Case bofore court U/s 138 N I act both Party out of court compromise and made agreement.
After then accused not folow the agreement and case at the stage of Final Argument .
So I want present comprise AGreement before Court.
Plz Guide me in which sec present appliction for Agreement on Rocord on Court.
Plz urgent,
Thanks
With Warm Regard
J P Joshi
Anonymous
17 August 2011 at 12:51
Sir, Can u help me to find out the following judgement as it needed urgently.
there is judgment on the point that if the accused is otherwise entitled for bail, he can not be refused on the ground that he belongs to other state other than the state, where offence is registered.
thanx in advance.
Manohar N. Rajput
17 August 2011 at 12:49
What will be the effect on case if complainant died during the pending of the complaint
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Builder files a case under section ipc 500, 190 and 200
Dear Sir,
We few of the residents staying in gated community flats at Hyderabad have been asking the builder to submit all the relevant documents to the gram panchyat enabling us to pay our property tax and to show us the detailed accounts since the owners association has been incorporated, as we are paying our monthly maintenance. This we had been asking since las more than a year now. He also wants to increase the montly maintanence to which we asked him to show the accounts to know if the increment is justifiable or not. To this the builder has put civil case against 12 residents in the month of Jan. 2011 stating that we are obstructing the workers from carrying out certain works and informing the propective buyers about the issues prevailing in the society. Now this month he has filed another fresh Criminal Case mentioning the same points against 4 residents whose names are also figuring in civil case. Out of 4 one of the resident has been residing in London since more than a year now. Sir, kindly guide us as to how to take it up as the Criminal Case has been filed under section IPC 500, 190 and 200 and we know all this is false case and he may also bring wrong witnessess. Kindly guide us. Regards, Jay