Anonymous
28 August 2011 at 19:06
Dear sir/madam,
Can I withdraw the case i have filed for defamation u/s 499 agst wife,as there has been compromise between me and my wife and divorce being done by mutual consent.all papers presented in court.
I filed the case on the ground of false allegation in div.petition filed by wife of embezzlement of cash from a company
No summon from court sent to wife till date.also 498A&406 and 125 filed by wife being settled.
-Is there any requirement of wife to be presented to court where I have filed defamation case u/s 499.
Thanks.
Anonymous
28 August 2011 at 18:43
Dear sir,
As I have received very valuable advises on this site.
Thanks for all !
Now I seek advise-can I finish the complain u/s 420 and 406 agst.my wife and her father which(case) is registered in police,statement of mine and neighbours done but no investigation carried on by IO.
As i had to compromise with my wife who filed 498A,406,125 and divorce.
I filed complain u/s 420 and 406 ast wife & her father for excess jwellery taken by wife and her father on record with their sign.Now divorce by mutual consent,compromise u/s498A & 406 and 125 papers presented in court. so I have to also withdraw my complain.As per Instruction of my lawer and talking with IO,
I have presented application and affidavit on Rs 10/- stamp(un notarised)containing" As compromise between me and my wife and/incl. her father has been done.and there all disputes between me and wife finished and we have presented compromise/rajeenama in all cases, So I do not want any action."
--Pls advise me this affidavit will finish the case or anything more or any problem it may be with me.
-Is wife and her father required to come to the court or police where I have filed the complain for any legal/police requirement.
pls tell me.
Thanks a lot !
Anonymous
28 August 2011 at 14:04
in one of the case crime branc accused 7 people out of which 2 (one officer and one grade 4 employee, both had nexus) were absconding for 5-6 months. their bail application were rejected by HC about 2 months back. now they have got bail. They are in govt office.
after getting bail now they are asking one of the employee of their department (who is person of integrity and honesty and the same is confirmed by crime branch) to have a telephonic conversation.
this May be to entangle him so that get absolved from the case. they may record his conversation and may force him to accept fact whihc he may have (not sure) carried out to obey his boss since he has no option but to follow instructions of his boss (this happens in govt offices).
please suggest what should be the course of action of other employee? what are his rights?
I want to help the an employee who is set an example for me of honesty by scolding a guy who was trying to offer him bribe.
Please helppp ASAP.
amarnathdhamayanthi
28 August 2011 at 13:05
i already ask query for property return from police officers in sec 133 of crpc, i had received answers to file petition before rdo, now i have one doubt in said answers i.e., whether i have to file a petition completion of rdo enquiry or at any time even pendency of the rdo enquiry?
Anonymous
28 August 2011 at 12:56
wheather a witness who has been declared hostile and after that in crossexamination public prosecuter contradict him from his previous statement and that witness supports p p than wheather this evidence will be read against accused or not please give answer with citations if available
Anonymous
28 August 2011 at 12:49
Can anybody tell me the minimum judicial custody required in the above mention offence when allegation against the person is that he is only employee of the company against which case is register
amarnathdhamayanthi
28 August 2011 at 12:35
respected all experts,in former pm rajiv gandhi's assassination case our supreme court had passed capital punishment for accused in the names of perarivalan, murugan, santhan. The above said accused are filed the mercy petition before our president and the same was rejected and their punishment execution date also announced, in this circumstances some political and public organisations agitate our supreme court judgement. this doings are correct or wrong.......
amarnath from tamilnadu
Anonymous
28 August 2011 at 12:20
Demand of maintenance Rs.1500/- per month is mandatory please discuss with case law
Anonymous
28 August 2011 at 08:49
Sir
Whether the abuses and other conversation made in public by the complainant , which were recorded with the help of a tape recorder by the opposite party , can be played during the cross examination of the complainant in a criminal trial before the court? What is the procedure of it and whether it is of any evidentiary value in view of the fact that complainant has alleged in his complaint that opposite party used to abuse him and his family? matter is relating to 323 IPC. Pl advice
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Urgent information
hounrable lawyer,
i just want to that in which conditions a case is refered for fast track hearings???
thanks for your advice in advance