can s statement made in a bail application, filed on behalf of the accused, be used as an evidence against him, specially when the accused has refused that he had instructed his lawyer for the same and his lawyer and the pairvikaar also deposed that the statement made in the bail petition were given without the consent from the accused.
whether an aggrieved person can insist that the offence be investigated by a particular agency ?
whether Magistrate has power to driect the investigation by C.B.I.?
can statement u/s 164 cr. p.c. be taken second time or twice?
Whether an accused ,released on bail in a particular case ,may arrested on the merely ground that another offence has been added to the list of offences.
Injuries on person accused -non-explanation-what effect.what cases law give me S.C.JUDGEMENTS
can a defence lawyer pray for Making a statemet u/s 164 of Cr.PC before the court in a case of u/s 397/395/414 of the IPC to give statement of complainant/informant of the case at pre- trail stage?
death by fire. pouring k.oil in wick stove.doctor deposed vg stated caught fire accidentally in the process.% of burn not mentioned.accident or homicide?proof?
Cheque dishonored on feb 24th with memo stopped payment of party 'A'
Notice seved on 7th march 08.for payment in 15 days.to part 'A' by party 'B"
Notice received by party 'A' on 17th march.FOR PAYMENTS WITHIN 15 DAYS FROM THE RECEIPT OF NOTICE.
Drafts made by party 'A' on 24th march and informed party 'B' to collect through councellor.of party 'A'.
party 'B' AKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF LETTER BUT NOT OF PHOTOCOPIES OF DRAFTS. AND REPEATS TO PAY THE AMOUNT IN DUE TIME. THIS LETTER RECEIVED ON 1ST APRIL.BY THE PARTY 'A'.
PARTY 'B' FILES CASE UNDER 138 CR.
WHAT IS THE STATUS OF PARTY 'A'.
DATE FIXED FOR 4-9-08.
further investigation
futher investigation -Application for-Dismissed by trial Magistrate -complaint before Magistrate -matter referred by magistrate u/s.156(3)-police didn't investigate the matter fairly and filed negative final report-Madistrate dismissed the application for re-investigation with view that complainant may produce the evidence during trial- Whether Magistrate justified ?