Tribhuwan Pandey
30 September 2008 at 19:19
Conviction upheld by the High Court
Accused on bail directed to surrender if not be arrested. Bail bond forfeited.
Whether the accuse has to surrender for filing an appeal before the Supreme Court or his SLP can be entertained directly?
Legal Fighter
30 September 2008 at 10:15
Does the High Court has powers to transfer FIR from one state to another?
SHEKHAR MISHRA
29 September 2008 at 16:50
A is charged with travelling on a railway without ticket.He denies this, on whom does the burden lies?
SHEKHAR MISHRA
29 September 2008 at 16:16
At the trial, the accused pleads guilty to the charge. The magistrate does not record the statement of the accused under sec.313 of crpc and convicts him.Is it a valid order?
Rekha.....
28 September 2008 at 18:35
Hello! My Gud friends
Hope u all r in a best of health n sprit
Again I need Help from U.
I need Authorities based on sec.12 of Juvenile Justice Act arrested under the charge of sec. 376 of IPC and applied for Bail. I am in the side of accused. Plz supply me soft copy of it. If it is possible send me immediately.
Thax
salilkumarp
28 September 2008 at 12:58
SIRS,
TWO PERSONS STOOD AS SURETY FOR AN ACCSUED, PRODUCING THEIR LAND TAXPAID RECEIPT , ALLEGED TO HAVE BEEN ISSUED BY CONCERNED VILLAGE OFFICER.
BUT ON VERIFICATION, MAGISTRATE CAME TO KNOW THAT SURETIES ARE FAKE....THEY HAVE NO LANDED PROPERTIES....TAX PAID RECEIPT
IS A FORGED DOCUMENT.SO, MAGISTRATE TOOK CAse u/s 463 471 475 ipc by handing over acomplaint to police u/s 190 crpc.
now the same court is trying the matter and magistrate himself was examined as pw1
......fortunately he was transfered by that time ! is it an illegality ?
what is 340 crpc and 195 crpc ?
non--transfering of case to another court will vitiate the trail?
any citations ?
salilkumarp
28 September 2008 at 12:43
SIRS,
WII YOU PLEASE EXPLAIN { IN BRIEF} SEC 42 AND SEC 50 OF NDPS.
WHETHER IT IS APPLICABLE TO CASUAL SEARCH( NO PRIOR INFORMATION)? IS THERE ANY
DIFFERANCE OF APPLICABILITY OF THESE SEC.S IN CASE OF SEIZURE FROM BODY OF A PERSON AND SEIZURE FROM SUIT CASE/CARRY-BAG WHICH THE ACCUSED WAS HOLDING.?
WHETHER NON-COMPLIANCE OF THESE SEC.S WILL VITIATE THE ENTIRE TRAIL / IS ONLY A CURABLE IRREGULARITY ?
PLS GIVE RECENT SUPREME COURT DECISIONS
Dilip srivastav
28 September 2008 at 12:38
IS cri revision (sec.397crpc) not lie against summoning order in complaint case?
salilkumarp
28 September 2008 at 12:30
sirs,
as everybody knows, anticipatory bail can be moved only in cases where the offences are non-bailable and there is apprehension of arrest.
here, in a 138 ni act case,accused failed to appear before the court on receipt of summons ,long back in 2006.now warrant is pending against the accused and 82 83 crpc steps are already taken.now the accused wants to surrender before the court.but,on , that when an accused is surrendeing in a LPC case ,even if it be in minor offence like 138 case, there is every chance o f court remanding him to judicial custody at least for one day.
to avoid this, accused wishes to file an anticipatory bail application in district court.
here my doubt is:
whether an accused can file an anticipatory bail application in a 138 ni case (bailable offence)in which non-bailable warrant is pendiding and accused is apprehending arrest ?
Member Strength 9,46,607 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
about cross -in-examination in criminal trial.
whether cross in examination can be reopened in the matter of section 138 of N.I.Act?