Ashvin Khambhata
13 August 2009 at 16:06
I have filled one complain u/S 138 OF N.I Act.At the time of filling evidence I have presened the cheque along with list of another case means irrelevent documents produced. I want 2 take back said documents .Under what law can i get back said documents ?
aparna
13 August 2009 at 13:53
I read an article in the "Sakal" marathi newspaper. In the said article the wife had filed a complaint against her husband and in-laws after about an year. The article stated that the husband resides in some area near Parwati, Pune (MAharashtra), the wife stays in Baroda(Gujarat) with her parents. The article stated that the Gujarat police on getting a complaint had acted on the complaint and arrested the husband and his parents under S. 498 A. question I want to ask is that under what section can this be done? Mine is a similar case but when I went to the police station, my complaint was rejected on the ground that the husband not residing in the same town S. 498 A cannot be attracted If S, 498A can be applied in the abovestated case why not in my case? So i wanted to know how and under what provisions can it be done?
Adinath@Avinash Patil
13 August 2009 at 05:38
What is plea bargaing?.Is accused of offence u/s 138 of N.I.Act [dishonour of cheque] ask for plea bargaing?.
PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
12 August 2009 at 22:46
hello all learned experts
i wnat the conviction citation under the dowry section 3 and 4 and u/s 498 pls provide if posssible thanks
PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
12 August 2009 at 22:39
hello all learned experts
i have lodged claim case u/s 500 of ipc against father in law who sent letter having written abuse words regarding the character and another things abusive now this case is on the stage of evidance the letter sent to m y client by her father inlow having zerox copy and only one paper sent original now when i take the chief exmaination on that time for the converting the secondary evidence ( zerox letter) into primary evidence i have to ask to compalinat after showing that is this ur father inlaws handwriting and u identu it if she says yesit will be exhibited am i right ? if differ inform thanks in advance
jayachandran
12 August 2009 at 20:45
Dear Experts
I have a question. please answer with any citations, if available
A Chief Judicial Magistrate issued warrant appointing an Advocate Commissioner to take possession of a property, under Sec.14 of the SARFASI Act. The period mentioned in the warrant expired and not executed by the Advocate Commissioner
Can the CJM revalidate the warrant by extending the time retrospectively -or-
the CJM has to issue fresh warrant.
Similarly, whether the CJM can suspend the execution of warrant for say, one month or two months, for any reason. Is the CJM has the power to do so.
Kindly reply
I will be thankful and the answer will help me
jayachandran
12 August 2009 at 20:39
Dear Experts
Chief Judicial Magistrate passed an order issuing warrant to take possession under Sec.14 of SARFASI Act.
Can the experts give valuable suggestions about the remedy available to the person against whose property warrant was issued.
1. Whether Crl.Revision before the High Court under Sec.482 Cr.P.C. is proper -or-
2. An application to vacate the order before the CJM is proper
Any decision-reported, if cited, I will feel happy.
KOUSTUV DEY
12 August 2009 at 19:20
I would like to know whether ECS bounces are under the purview of NI Act or not. If they are not then how banks are filing cases under NI act.
Apurva Kumar
12 August 2009 at 07:44
Dear Sir/Mam,
As we all know that in 1993 sec 364B was added which says-kidnapping for ransom, in which maximum punishment extends to -shall be punishable with death, now the case is that in one of my cri appeal i.e also a death reference client has been awarded in rareast of rare catogry death penality court has asked to guard them that in indian history how many times same has been granted so i need ur alls help in whatever means u can citation will do along with valuable enlightment!
Regards!
AP!(apurvakrsharma@gmail.com)
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
perjury
should the existing procedure of taking cognizance of perjury at dock only at the time of judgment be amended? it is there so as not to put the witness under constant fear.but if there is no immediate apprehension of punishment for perjury witnesses would not care Section-193 IPC. the present poor rate of conviction in the sessions courts inspite of high crime rate is due to this. still very few proceedings are started u/s 340 or 344 Cr.P.C.