Criminal Contempt of Court Questions?

One person makes different statements in different court proceedings (FIR, Magistrate, High Court, State Cosumer Forum) which are in total contradiction and false. Now my question is that can I file a common contempt of court application for all the cause of actions? Also before court will it lie? Can a common application lie directly before Supreme court? Do I need some prior approval from concerned court or Attorney general before filing contempt of court application? pls let me know.riven

Section 138 N. I. Act

I entered into an agreement with the landlord to develop the land and construct a multistory building thereon, as such according to agreement I have given a cheque of Rs.2,50,000/- to the land lord in consideration thereof, but in the mean time the landlord did not supply me the Original documents relating to the said land because there was no provision agreed in agreement to supply original documents as such I could not able to get sanctioned the plan and could not construct the multistory building, mean while the landlord got the aforesaid cheque dishonoured and filed a criminal case U/s. 138 of N.I. Act, am I liable for punishment U/s. 138 of N. I. Act, if not please suggest me with case law.riven

complaint

Whether a person gaves complaint, be added as accused in the same case without obtaining any complaint from others?riven

Defamation

Does the act of displaying, in public, the name of defaulters in notice displayed in notice board by Hoousing Co Operative societies constitute defamation?riven

False dowry case

Hello Sir/Madam,

A false dowry harassment case has been registered against my brother and his sisters(# 3) inclusing me.

Myself and my elder sister are married and stay seperately though all of us are in same city.

She is very criminal minded and want to destroy my brother life. She (my sister in law)is very independent girl and wants a very lavish life which my brother cannot afford due to his commitments. So she has booked case against us.

Please advice what to do and is there any strong lawyer available in Bangalore?riven

CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY

The Section on Criminal Conspiracy uses 2 terms namely, "illegal act" and "illegal means". Illegal act mean - "an act prohibited by law". What does "illegal means" mean. Literally one may say it mean "means prohibited by law". Can some please give me a few examples of "means prohibited by law"
riven

NEGOTIALBLE INSTRUMENT ACT S. 138

I have heard about one S.C. judgement which says that bank or co-op. society can't file complaint u/s 138. Is it true ?
If yes, please give information about that judgement.riven

contempt of court by Supreme court to sent jail to minister

in one case in the year May 2006 the HSC has sent jail to one siting Minister , i want the party name and citation for the purpose of the study of this case. Pl help me.riven

Bank pays for blacklisting, threatening customer

Bank pays for blacklisting, threatening customer



C Unnikrishnan | TNN



Mumbai: The next time a bank offers a free credit card, think twice before saying yes. An advocate learnt this the hard way when a bank recently went to the extent of notifying his name as a defaulter with the Credit Information Bureau of (India) Limited (Cibil) even though it was not his fault.
The move meant that the advocate, K P Sreejith, would have found it impossible to avail a bank loan. However, refusing to take things lying down, Sreejith sued the bank, which was then directed by the consumer dispute redressal forum to pay up Rs 25,000 towards ‘mental agony and loss of reputation’ and another Rs 5,000 towards cost of litigation.
In August 2007, Barclay Bank approached Sreejith and offered a free life-time credit card considering his “good payment track record”. Sreejith, who was initially reluctant, accepted the offer. On October 7, 2007, he made a purchase of Rs 918 through the card. A month later, the bank informed Sreejith over phone that he had not made the payment due on November 17. Sreejith claimed that he had not received the statement but promptly paid the amount in accordance with the bank’s instructions. But soon he got the statement, in which where he was charged Rs 300 towards delayed payment. After Sreejith failed to get through to the bank over the phone, he sent an e-mail explaining the situation and requested them waive off the late fee. The bank reverted saying the m at t e r had been forwarded to the department concerned. Even as the dispute was on, the late fee amount accumulated to Rs 2,000 and the bank allegedly sent recovery agents, who threatened Sreejith with dire consequences if the amount was not paid.
On January 4, 2008, the bank sent a letter to Sreejith asking him to pay Rs 734 and suspended his card. In February, the bank wrote saying the card would be permanently withdrawn and details would be forwarded to Cibil. On March 3, the bank carried out its threat after which Sreejith approached the consumer forum. The bank denied issuing any threats and said levying late fee was proper. The bank also said that Cibil is not a defaulters’ list but only a data base of customers’ credit history. The bank filed an affidavit saying the charges were reversed and there was no outstanding, which was intimated to Cibil.
The forum comprising president S P Mahajan and members Jyoti Iyer and S S Patil observed the bank had no regards for RBI directives as complaints to the customer services head was not attended to. “The act of the bank in employing recovery agents is highly deplorable and it appears that the bank has no respect for the rule of the law.’’ the forum added.

_______________________

Please comment
riven

credit card