Avinash kumar seth
28 September 2009 at 18:53
please know me the name of the site from where i know the judgement regarding false and fabricated case.
Avinash kumar seth
28 September 2009 at 18:48
When a lady lodged a complaint and after 14 months she wrote letter to her office authority that she lodged an FIR number/year dated so and so the contents of this fir are false and fabricated due to acute pressure of my husband i do this.
in defence witnesses three Gazatted officers stated yes she wrote two letter regarding above said statement.
Ld Col for the accused submitted this letter truly attested by one of her office Gazatted officer as DW she say yes I attested this letter.
Now case is on final argument on next date of hearing.
What is the decision by the MM in the above case.
Please give me your opinion.
Thanks,
Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate
28 September 2009 at 13:05
a person name-x,issue cheque of his firm (propriter)to my client ,because his account is firm name.
i file case by x'name, whenever that cheque was firm name,
court want to setisfy that the account holder is x.
how i can prove?
Nitin
28 September 2009 at 04:22
A files divorce case against B in India. B appears in the case requesting interim maintenance (but not against divorce). However B also files and gets ex-parte divorce in USA after the pparance in the Indian case. A prefers no appeal against the foreign decree and the decree is final. A remarries after the mandatory period in the foreign divorce decree and withdraws his case in India *after* the re-marriage.
Can B accuse A of bigamy if she has acquired divorce on her own? Can she claim to be divorced in USA and married in India? Doesn't the law of estoppel prevent her?
venkatesh
27 September 2009 at 22:57
Party entered into Compromise before Magistrate and agreed to pay the cheque amount in two installments, judgment was passed accordingly, now accused had preferred an appeal, whether compromised judgment can be appealed
Dipak pritam
27 September 2009 at 12:15
Police registered FIR and note Statement of Eyewitness.
According to Police investigation Report There is 4 eyewitnesses.
And Cross examination in Fast Trail is under going now can possible for Re investigation against Fake witness.
How identify witness is Fake. And can be Investigate outside Police.
Or collect proof of lying
Dhiraj A Rajhans
27 September 2009 at 11:05
filed a complaint against proprietor firm under sec. 138 of N. I. Act. The name of the proprietor is typed correctly but the name of proprietor firm is typed wrongly both in complaint and evidence affidavit. the said mistake was recognized at the time of cross examination. can such mistakes be rectified??? if possible please provide case laws.....
Dipak pritam
27 September 2009 at 04:52
Sir,
Once the police has been registered the FIR on 06-Mar-2005, and Submit charge, police authority has been to file charge sheet in court, on 30-Jan2009.
Accuse has charge in FIR IPC 302/448/149/148/147/27 ARMS ACT and
According to FIR he is member of mob.,
Please clearly me that person if eligible for Government jobs. That case He can face problem in getting Government jobs. Or not. What is law Government jobs for that condition.
Shujath Khan
26 September 2009 at 13:58
Hello Sir,
I am a student of Medical College while coming back home on my bike where one boy from the lane where his house is come out suddenly on a bike where I and the person in other direction both applied the sudden brake without hitting the boy who came suddenly we both fall dawn.
The other person as soon as he got up abuse the boy who came suddenly in front and hold the collar of the shirt, where people around the street separated them with that he took his bike and left.
During that time I got up taken out my helmet, collected my belongings which got scattered like my medical apron, books and about to lift my fallen bike the boy who came in front suddenly from the lane where his house is 2 to 3 more boys came whom he was referring as his big brothers started hitting me
One Big Boy given a Blow on my Eye, a hard punch on my right ear and suddenly one more came with Iron Rod from the house and hit on my head which started bleeding badly – If the rod had hit an inch away I might have died with the brain ham rage.
About 100 meters away there is police station from where cops came by then and boys who hit me left the place soon after that. The 2 constables took me to the police station from where I call my family members where my house is about 2 kms from the place of incident they came immediately and took me to the hospital where I got about 5 stitches on my head and big bruise on my left eye and below the right ear on the neck.
One of the cop visited the hospital and took my statement and promise that he will find the culprits who did this, but its past 24 hrs police has not done anything and when inquired they said they are not able to find who did that, but everyone on the street the shopkeepers, and people residing there they knew well who did that and who are the ones. I am very sure Police also knows who did that but keeping the eyes close.
Please guide me what steps I can take and whom all I can approach to make sure the people who injured me get punish by the law and next time dare not think of repeating this incident to anyone else.
Appreciate your reply ASAP
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
138 NI ACT
SIR MY CLIENT RECIEVED A DEMAND NOTICE FOR CERTAIN SUM OF RUPEES AS IT WAS MENTIONED IN THE NOTICE THAT I HAVE ISSUED A CHEQUE WHICH WAS RETURNED WITH BANK ENDORSEMENT OF A/C CLOSED.
MY CLIENT RECIVED THIS NOTICE FROM HIS TENANT.HIS TENANT FEW YEARS BACK DEPOSITED THE SUM OF RS. 1 LAC IN A/C OF HIS LANDLORD I.E. MY CLIENT.SAME WAS DEBITED BY MY CLIENT UPON HIS REQUEST.MY CLIENT DISPOSED OF ALL THE CHEQUES AND CLOSED HIS ACCOUNT AFTER THAT.
NOW WHEN HE GOT THE DEMAND NOTICE HE SUSPECTED THAT FEW CHEQUES WERE STOLEN BY HIS TENANT WHICH HE HAS USED TO GRAB HIM IN LITIGATION.
WE SAW THE CHEQUE IN THE COURT .THERE IS A DIFFERENCE IF SIGNATURES AND HANDWRITING.
COMPLAINANT IS SAYING THAT RS 1 LAC WAS TAKEN BY MY CLIENT FOR DISCHRGING HIS LIABILITY HE ISSUED THIS CHEQUE.
LANDLORD IS UNDER SUSPICISION REGARDING THE MISUSE OF OTHER CHEQUE WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN STOLEN BY THE TENAT.
SO TELL ME WHAT SHOULD BE THE FIREST STEP NOW