vikram
09 October 2009 at 14:41
My uncle is acquesed for Criminal Case.
He is innocent and expecting law to justify him.
Want to know if a certain condition High court rejected Anticipatory bail and issue warrante for arrest and coorkijabti.
Can he able to go further like Supreme court or again apply in High court.
Case is 10 years old, in bihar just for investigation delay and corruption he getting involve.
Plz suggest because i want he get proper Judgement and Anticipator bail so that case comes in regular basis.
Waiting
Suhas
09 October 2009 at 12:18
My query is as follows:
There is a company which is pursuing legal action against an individual in a magistrate court. The authorised representative of the company stood for examination-in-chief. Thereafter the authorised representative of the company stood for cross-examination, and before the cross examination was completed, the said authorised representative left the services of the company.
When a new representative of the company is subtituted to appear in place of the original person, will the already completed examination-in-chief, and the partially completed cross-examination continue to stand, or will the examination-in-chief and cross-examination have to be conducted afresh?
Thanks
Nishant Khosla
09 October 2009 at 11:39
i wanted to know the full facts of the case like the persons who went along with virsa singh were having any kind of weapons in their hand i want the full case full facts pl its urgent.
Adinath@Avinash Patil
09 October 2009 at 08:39
THIS IS FOR RECENTLY ASKED QUERY REGADING FOREIN CHEQUE DIHONURED AND ALL LEARNED MEMBERS LAWYERS CLUB OF INDIA.
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT A881-- SRCTIONS 138,135,136,137--DISHONURE OF CHEQUE-PRESUMPTION ABOUT FOREIGN LAW AND TERRITORIAL JUEISDICTION--CHEQQUE DRAWN ON FOREIGN BANK IN SINGAPORE-PRESENTED BY COMPLAINANT AT MADRAS IN INDIA WHERE HIS COMPANY IS SITUATED -COMPLAIT HAS NO ACCOUNT IN ANY BANK IN SINGAPORE-SECTION 136 AND 137 ARE SUFFICIENTSAFE GUARDS FOR COMPAIES IN INDIA TO PROCEED AGAINST FOREIGN COMPANIES -IF INSTRUMENTS DISHONURED- NO BAR FOR PROSECUTION IN INDIA.
TRILUX TECHNOLOGY SINGAPORE PVT.LTD.V/S BOOM TECHNOLOGIES REP.BY ITS MANAGER.
DECIDED ON.29/03/2004. MADRAS HIGH COURT.
2004 DCR 642.
ashok prajapati
08 October 2009 at 09:36
Respected Members
Kindly send me some citations for bail of Accused case us 460/461/462/463/464/465/466/467/468/469/470/471/420 IPC .Thanx Regards
ashok prajapati Advocate
Sachdeva
08 October 2009 at 04:56
Sir,
A forgery case had been registered (FIR) against a person, who tried to usurp my property, after two and a half years through the lower court and the Investigation has been going on for the last three years owing to delay of police department with the change of three Investigation Officers who have been shielding the accused and no progress is found because first the verification of signatures in the forged document has been collected to be sent to the FSL where the report came since the absence of contemporary signatures -- i.e. the signatures sent are the present ones but not the signatures sent at the time forgery took place -- authentication of the present signatures could not be established of the forgery signatures. In this process two years passed from the date of registering the FIR along with the police improper investigation knowingly delay the case so that the accused could go scot-free without punishment. Further now even after one year (total of three years after registering the FIR) the relevant original documents are missing from the Court files and the court has not taken seriousness of these lapses giving the apprehension that whether Judge is also favouring the accused who happened to be the notorious person in this types of cases as there were number of FIRS have been registered against hi. Since he is very influential person of unfair dealings he could able to prolong the proceedings of the court. Besides, the court Order sheets which would be revealing the nature of vanishing original documents has also been missing from the Case files of the court.
Under these circumstances what my advocate should do for immediate relief as I am really fed up with deliverance of the natural justice. Please suggest me the course of action which would give me instant respite and I shall be grateful to you and I immediately require a good pleader to take up my case of both the civil as well as criminal cases. Please respond.
vinod bansal
07 October 2009 at 22:40
Respected Members
Kindly send me some citations for bail of Accused (Single Accused case)in a case us 376/511/323/506 IPC .prosecutrix is 40 years old .Thanx Regards
Vinod Bansal Advocate
vinod bansal
07 October 2009 at 22:37
Respected Members
Kindly send me some citations for bail of Accused (juvenile and first offender)in a case us 302/201/34 IPC.Case is based on circumstantial evidence bcoz it was a blind murder.Regards
Priyanka mehta
07 October 2009 at 13:29
wheteher medical certificate issued by private hospital can be admitted as evidence? any relevant judgement on the same
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Difference Between Column 1 and 2 of Chargesheet
What is the difference between column 1 and 2 of the chargesheet?
If there are allegations in the FIR against the accused but no supporting evidence is there, in which column will the accused be kept in the chargesheet?