ghansham das
18 October 2009 at 14:57
DEAR ALL,
THERE IS QUESTION BY MR RAVI, 17 OCT,09.
FORM 32 SUBMITTED , GIVES RELIEF?
MY QUERRY-
*IS IT REASONABLE FOR COMPLAINANT TO KNOW BEFORE FILLING COMPLAINANT AGAINST THE CHAIR PERSON PRESENT ON CHAIR/ ?
*WHEN ROC WILL NOT REPLY WITH IN TWO WEEKS OF TIMES AS REQUIRED TO FILE CASE U/S 138 AFTER NOTICE IS SERVICED,?
*IS THE COURTS JUDGMENTS DRAW A LINE THAT CHAIRMAN/ DIRECTORS, BOARDS ARE NOT GUILTY?
IS THAT COURT IS NOT ABLE TO JUSTIFY THAT THE BENEFICIARY IS BELIVED TO HV FAITH IN SYSTEM, JUSTICE, NOT LINGERING PROCESS ENDLESSLY???
PLS CRALIFY..???
after going hro' jc scc it is felt that the court is merely passing some orders with out keeping in view that how the complainnat is suffering for justice, is over looked, after years after years, what the use of it, if the same money is paid after ten-twenty years????
gdgupta10@rediffmail.com
Rajesh Palande
17 October 2009 at 19:01
We had employed a driver, and dismissed him from service due to misbehavior with proprietor who is a lady. After few years the same man came and demanded Rs.7000/- which he claimed as unsettlled dues. He also signed on a promisory on 100/- non-judicial stamp paper mentioning that he would not harras any of family members, and he does not owe any dues with us. 3-4 days ago he stole 2 batterries and 2 car tape from buses owned by us. Police had formally arrested him recovered batterries. However the are not recording our complaint and have released him. Police say that we would catch him once they record our compliant. Every time we go to launch a complaint they avoid telling some or other reasons. We feel that police have co-operated till now by arresting him recovering the stolen batteries but why so delay in criminal proceedings. Please guide us what can be done in this.
Rajesh Palande
17 October 2009 at 18:59
We had employed a driver, and dismissed him from service due to misbehavior with proprietor who is a lady. After few years the same man came and demanded Rs.7000/- which he claimed as unsettlled dues. He also signed on a promisory on 100/- non-judicial stamp paper mentioning that he would not harras any of family members, and he does not owe any dues with us. 3-4 days ago he stole 2 batterries and 2 car tape from buses owned by us. Police had formally arrested him recovered batterries. However the are not recording our complaint and have released him. Police say that we would catch him once they record our compliant. Every time we go to launch a complaint they avoid telling some or other reasons. We feel that police have co-operated till now by arresting him recovering the stolen batteries but why so delay in criminal proceedings. Please guide us what can be done in this.
AC MAINI
17 October 2009 at 18:43
In the present electronic age Pl. tell me if the E mails exchanged between two conspirators are admissible as evidence.
Similarly in adultery whether recorded Telephone conversation having illicit relation talks can stand to prove the offence.
ramjishyamji
17 October 2009 at 17:16
Accused issued post dated cheque as Chairman and managing director. against maturity of debentures.Before the due date he resigns.Consideration against MOU under which resigns not paid.
pls advise with favourable case laws
Ajay Kochar
16 October 2009 at 17:41
There is an house robbery and theft at my residential address as on 11/07/2009. I filled a FIR in a manpada Police Station and mentioned the name of House Maid in FIR.
But even after 3 months police not taken any action against her. Laxmi only knows on that date we are going to outside of Dombivli. She even worked on that day by taking keys from the neighbour. She only knows where my wifr took Money and ornaments bcoz she worked at our home from the last 5 yrs. Even I given a seprate letter regarding Laxmi is the main suspect in this case. But police not taking any Investigation, not even visit after 13/07/09 for a single time. No finger prints, No photos, no dog scod, nothing is doen No charge sheet is filled against laxmi. Pls advice what to do?
Preetam
16 October 2009 at 11:59
Hi,
A perusal of the Prevention of Corruption Act and the IPC reveals to me that 'accepting bribe' is an offence, but 'giving bribe' does not appear to be an offense. In other words, a government official accepting bribe can be prosecuted, but the law does not provide for prosecution of a person giving the bribe. However, most prominent persons (includng the PM and the Lokayukta) seem to be a of a view that even giving a bribe is an offense just as much as accepting a bribe. If giving bribe is really an offence under Indian laws, can you please direct me to the relevant provisions or a particular case law in this regard. Thanks.
Legal Fighter
16 October 2009 at 10:36
Wife has fled to abroad after filing false 498A and DV case. Now her counsel takes date on one pretext or the other and the cases are not progressing. I want to finish off the cases as soon as possible as I can disapprove all of her false allegations with sufficient proofs.
What should I do so as to conclude the cases as soon as possible? Kindly suggest?
Grace
16 October 2009 at 09:22
Dear Mr.Kiran Kumar,
Thank you for your very prompt reply. It is very helpful and gives us hope and courage to take the next step.
In the last sentence you mentioned SC judgements? What are they? And where do I find them? (Excuse my ignorance)
Thanks again.
Grace
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
after fake case
hello friends...
It's very unfortunate that so many fake cases are done on the poor and week by rich and influential people . Our world's one of the most corrupt police comes in such influence and start raping the freedom of innocent without any mercy . Anyway I need a suggestion in one of such cases done on me . I am shubham working in a private construction firm in aurangabad, maharashtra. Here I came in contact with son of member of parliament(should not mention name) who claimed to be my very good friend . One day he told me that he is interested to work in my company and I should vouch for him to hr manager , but I gave up becoz me myself don't have good relation with him . This made him angry ,he stopped talking to me . Though I tried hard to explain him but he was not ready to listen . with time I ignored him , but his grudge aggregated in due course and one day I came to know that he is preparing to take some sort of revenge .Then my hr in office informed me that they have received an application where the complainant has claimed that I have taken 5 lac rupees for job in my company . Though the hr helped me and replied him back that I am not the authority and rest issue is personal . I was in damn tension after that , every new day a police officer would call on phone and tell me to give him money . When I told story to my general manager he transferred me to nasik .Then I came to listen that he has filed a 420 ipc complainant on me . Hehe that man have never spent 5 rupees on me , how would he give me 5 lakh. Anyways I immidiately applied in session court and when rejected applied in mumbai high court . It was granted on 5th oct with a validity of 2 months . Also after hearing both sides the h'ble judge wrote 'in the lights of fact this court is inclined to grant him anticipatory bail , without commenting further on merits this court orders.....'.
Is it a first victory..?
Can this anticipatory bail be challenged as the complainant is son of m.p and has good relation with local police and administration ?
now what to do ? can I apply for regular bail within this time period before validity of AB expires . I can easily get bail by police but what about court on surrender .
I have a family to support , my kids are small . I don't want to land up in jail . Also I am not ready to give up to atrocities of police , I am ready to loose everything but not bend on my kne