Rajneesh Madhok
16 November 2009 at 20:49
Alleged fraud claiming to be a doctor of AIIMS
I got this E-mail from Mrs. Madhumita Sadhukhan, the tale of a quack practicing in Delhi and claims himself a doctor from AIIMS and the details has been attached. There seems to be no one to listen to the pleadings of the wailing mother who had been looted by the quack and the police and medical council of India don’t take action on the said quack. I pray to the Indian Medical Association anti-quackery Cell to kindly take action and provide justice to the wailing mother.
When it has been proved that the doctor who specifies himself a doctor and is practicing and the police complaint has been lodged against this fraud doctor then why not the police department and medical department take action against him. It is a great set back to general public and secondly it causes harm to the patients and the public Medical code of Ethics has specifically mentioned that no doctor is allowed to practice and should not claim to show miracle in treatment But there is no check on this type of quacks. Why not the Delhi Medical Association doctors come forward when all the evidences are being put by Mrs. Madhumita.
Why the tale of this self proclaimed miracle-cure provider ends here and why our Government set such quacks free to cure the chronic patients from dreaded diseases.
When the mother demands action against the quack doctor, DMA the medical professionals and general public should come forward to help her in providing justice to her by putting pressure on the Govt. machinery to take action against the quack doctor. We should keep our fingers crossed in a hope that the common man does not fall prey to such type of quacks.
The tale is as under: --------------Rajneesh Madhok, B-xxx/63, Nehru Nagar, St. No. 2, Railway Road, Phagwara-144401 (Pb)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Madhumita Sadhukhan
Date: Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:32 PM
Subject: Alleged fraud claiming to be a doctor of AIIMS
To: dirdhs@nic.in
Dear Rajnish,
I, Madhumita Sadhukhan resident of Dhanbad sending you all the documents of the fraud who claims himself to be a doctor of AIIMS and who treated my son, Indranil Sadhukhan wrongly who is a chronic kidney patient. My son was previously treated at CMC Vellore and was under dialysis.
Through one of our distant relative Mrs Ishani Banerjee R/O Kalkaji we came to know about this fraud doctor. He assured us that my son would soon recover. He stopped his dialysis and started giving medicines which resulted in worsening condition of my son.
After enquiry we came to know that there is no such doctor called Supriyo Mukherjee at AIIMS.
Finally, at the eleventh hour we rushed to Sir Ganga Ram Hospital Delhi where after 8 days his condition became stabled.
We lodged an F.I.R against this fraud at Hari Nagar police station on 12/10/09 but no action has been taken till date. A criminal like him who is playing with the lives of critical patients should be immediately put behind the the bars.
Thanks for your kind cooperation and help. Hope our joint effort will deffinately save some more lives.
Thanking You
Madhumita Sadhukhan
Contact no : 09709023765
09661872818
NOTE : I am sending you all the scanned documents along with the photographs of the alleged fraud.
sneha
16 November 2009 at 15:13
Can Defamation case be quashed? If yes then how and on what grounds?
Anonymous
16 November 2009 at 11:08
what is the deference between bail and bond?
adv.renu sharma
16 November 2009 at 11:07
when person is arrested for an offense on FIR and withing 24hr the FIR is withdrawn by victim then what is the procedure ? whether arrested person send before magistrate or the police officer can release the accused person? or police officer can execute a bond from him?
pardeep
15 November 2009 at 22:46
what are the remedies against the order to framed a charge by judicial magistrate 1st class under section 420 of ipc
Anonymous
15 November 2009 at 22:42
in any law says, the advocates not filing vakkalath for his near relatives?
Karl Jacob
15 November 2009 at 20:38
Referred charge sheet has been filed in the FIR. Against that private complaint was also filed. Such private complaint was dismissed after full hearing of both sides. Now i want to take additional evidence on the side of the complainant. Is it possible? How?
Karl Jacob
15 November 2009 at 20:08
cheque was thieved from complainant by the Accused while cheque case is pending before the magistrate, whether case can proceed further with a xerox copy of the cheque?
Karl Jacob
15 November 2009 at 19:33
in a criminal revision, can we take additional evidence?
Karl Jacob
15 November 2009 at 19:31
will an appeal lie aganist the dissmisal order passed in 190 read with 200 crimnial procedure code?
Alleged fraud claiming to be a doctor of AIIMS
Alleged fraud claiming to be a doctor of AIIMS
I got this E-mail from Mrs. Madhumita Sadhukhan, the tale of a quack practicing in Delhi and claims himself a doctor from AIIMS and the details has been attached. There seems to be no one to listen to the pleadings of the wailing mother who had been looted by the quack and the police and medical council of India don’t take action on the said quack. I pray to the Indian Medical Association anti-quackery Cell to kindly take action and provide justice to the wailing mother.
When it has been proved that the doctor who specifies himself a doctor and is practicing and the police complaint has been lodged against this fraud doctor then why not the police department and medical department take action against him. It is a great set back to general public and secondly it causes harm to the patients and the public Medical code of Ethics has specifically mentioned that no doctor is allowed to practice and should not claim to show miracle in treatment But there is no check on this type of quacks. Why not the Delhi Medical Association doctors come forward when all the evidences are being put by Mrs. Madhumita.
Why the tale of this self proclaimed miracle-cure provider ends here and why our Government set such quacks free to cure the chronic patients from dreaded diseases.
When the mother demands action against the quack doctor, DMA the medical professionals and general public should come forward to help her in providing justice to her by putting pressure on the Govt. machinery to take action against the quack doctor. We should keep our fingers crossed in a hope that the common man does not fall prey to such type of quacks.
The tale is as under: --------------Rajneesh Madhok, B-xxx/63, Nehru Nagar, St. No. 2, Railway Road, Phagwara-144401 (Pb)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Madhumita Sadhukhan
Date: Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:32 PM
Subject: Alleged fraud claiming to be a doctor of AIIMS
To: dirdhs@nic.in
Dear Rajnish,
I, Madhumita Sadhukhan resident of Dhanbad sending you all the documents of the fraud who claims himself to be a doctor of AIIMS and who treated my son, Indranil Sadhukhan wrongly who is a chronic kidney patient. My son was previously treated at CMC Vellore and was under dialysis.
Through one of our distant relative Mrs Ishani Banerjee R/O Kalkaji we came to know about this fraud doctor. He assured us that my son would soon recover. He stopped his dialysis and started giving medicines which resulted in worsening condition of my son.
After enquiry we came to know that there is no such doctor called Supriyo Mukherjee at AIIMS.
Finally, at the eleventh hour we rushed to Sir Ganga Ram Hospital Delhi where after 8 days his condition became stabled.
We lodged an F.I.R against this fraud at Hari Nagar police station on 12/10/09 but no action has been taken till date. A criminal like him who is playing with the lives of critical patients should be immediately put behind the the bars.
Thanks for your kind cooperation and help. Hope our joint effort will deffinately save some more lives.
Thanking You
Madhumita Sadhukhan
Contact no : 09709023765
09661872818
NOTE : I am sending you all the scanned documents along with the photographs of the alleged fraud.