LCI Learning
New LIVE Course: Toxicology and Law. Batch begins 21st July. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

rAJAN   17 November 2009 at 18:35

criminal apeal

Sir,

I m fresh law graduate, I have some queried regarding appeal against aquital of accused under 420 case. In this case there were two accused .

1. In appeal by mistake i have just given the name of one accused and other party is state.now i want to know whether i can file amended appeal or make an application for the addition of accused no. 2.

2. my other question is that if i file the application or amended appeal , is there any effect to the cause of action.

Anonymous   17 November 2009 at 15:42

guranteer under 138

Respected Experts,
Borrower had taken loan from Agriculture funding from a bank. I am gurantor, and had given 7 blank cheques to the bank at that time.
The borrower & myself had applied for reschedulement to the bank as per RBI guidelines, but the bank did not answer for a long time,so we had gone to the Sr. Civil Court for that and the case is still pending.After that they had given notice under sec. 13/2 of SARFAESI Act.
Now the bank has deposited one cheque of mine in the bank as full & final payment on behalf of borrower.Now their advocate has given notice under sec.138.
Can they take any action under this sec of 138., if the matter is pending in the court.
Thanks.

Mansing patil   17 November 2009 at 15:33

what are the remedy to acquited from Section 302 of IPC

UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES IF A PERSON IS CHARED UNDER SECTION 302 OF IPC CAN BE ACQUITED

pallavi pahwa   17 November 2009 at 15:06

criminal law and accountability

can anyone kindly help me relate some of the provisions of CrPC with accountability of the police system.

Anonymous   17 November 2009 at 14:26

NBW against Sec 138 NI act

Hi,

I have a 138 case running against me in a court in faridabad Sessions Court. I have never been able to appear personally there. It is for a sum of Rs. 9,00,000/-. The court had issued a non bailable warrant against me. I live in pune. THis was in October. My lawyer appered in person in October there. Next date is on 4th December. I have been asked to furnish a bail with a surety of somebody with property worth 12,00,000/-. CAN I GET THE NBW CANCELLED AT THE BOMBAY HIGH COURT. WHAT IS THE PROCEDURE. CAN I ALSO GET THE CASE TRANFERRED TO EITHER BOMBAY OR PUNE. PLEASE SUGGEST.

CHEQUE ISSUED FROM PUNE DEPOSITED IN FARIDABAD. CASE FILED IN FARIDABAD.

Anonymous   17 November 2009 at 13:38

fight

what are the duties of police if somebody hit me slap and i call them. how can i force police to performed their duties.

Dr.Gaurang N. Gandhi   17 November 2009 at 08:42

N I act.138

If there is a contract performed by two parties regarding sell of goods at certained quality and as per the agreed prise. the buye handedover a cheque for the same at full payment in advance.

Now the saller delivered the goods in infirior quality.

In there agreemnt the saler is agreed to deposit the cheque only after delivery of the goods.


on delivery the buyer called the bank for stop-payment regarding the cheque handed over to the saler, by giving the ssaid cheque number.

at the same time he also inform the saler not to deposit the said cheque in the bank on the reason that the goods is not as per the sample quality.

dispite of that the saller deposit the same cheque in bank for payment of that.

the cheque is returned on the endorsement of stopped payment..


ON this the saller filed a suit in court.

Q1. can he has right?

2. what are the remedies for the buyer?

3. any extra suggestion both the side for saller and the buyer side.....

Dr.Gaurang N. Gandhi   17 November 2009 at 08:40

N.I.Act-138

If there is a contract performed by two parties regarding sell of goods at certained quality and as per the agreed prise. the buye handedover a cheque for the same at full payment in advance.

Now the saller delivered the goods in infirior quality.

In there agreemnt the saler is agreed to deposit the cheque only after delivery of the goods.


on delivery the buyer called the bank for stop-payment regarding the cheque handed over to the saler, by giving the ssaid cheque number.

at the same time he also inform the saler not to deposit the said cheque in the bank on the reason that the goods is not as per the sample quality.

dispite of that the saller deposit the same cheque in bank for payment of that.

the cheque is returned on the endorsement of stopped payment..


ON this the saller filed a suit in court.

Q1. can he has right?

2. what are the remedies for the buyer?

3. any extra suggestion both the side for saller and the buyer side.....

Anonymous   16 November 2009 at 22:32

LIMITATION PERIOD

WHAT IS THE TIME LIMITATION PERIOD FOR FILING A CASE FOR DEFAMATION ? IS THERE ANY EXCEPTION IF CASE IS FILED UNDER DEFAMATION AFTER THE EXPIRY OF THE TIME LIMITATION PERIOD ?

Anonymous   16 November 2009 at 21:45

whether private case can be lodge under sec 340crpc

in family corut my sisted has lodge case and honarable cout has ordered that to my brother inlaw to give maintaince but he has has summited false address in affidavit we inform honarable cout under 340 but i also lodge private complain kindly send me ref or ruling whether privte case can be lodge on my brotherinlaw if yes then send me refrance