Member (Account Deleted)
08 December 2009 at 10:49
SIR/MADAM I WANT TO KNOW THAT IN ACCIDENT CASE WHETHER BIKE (INSURED WITH A INSURANCE COMPANY)HAS STRUCK A PERSON AND HE INJURED THIS ACCIDENT. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT HE CLAIM AGAINST THAT INSURANCE COMPANY.
Rahul Singh
07 December 2009 at 21:34
Kindly explain the "Rule of Double Jeoparde",and its applicability to Cr.proceedings.
viky
07 December 2009 at 21:31
I got married in feb 2009 and that girl have put all those cases on my family and my uncle family. My uncle family belongs to haryana and the girl also belongs to same state wheras i am in other state from many years. But the case was registered in Haryana. So what can be done in this case?
1.Shall my family & uncle family have to take Bail and how this case can be dismissed as its a completely false case.
2. where as i have put divorce case before they have put all those case in my state where i am staying.
viky
07 December 2009 at 21:28
I got married in feb 2009 and that girl have put all those cases on my family and my uncle family. My uncle family belongs to haryana and the girl also belongs to same state wheras i am in other state from many years. But the case was registered in Haryana. So what can be done in this case?
1.Shall my family & uncle family have to take Bail and how this case can be dismissed as its a completely false case.
2. where as i have put divorce case before they have put all those case in my state where i am staying.
Anonymous
07 December 2009 at 21:22
I got married in feb 2009 and that girl have put all those cases on my family and my uncle family. My uncle family belongs to haryana and the girl also belongs to same state wheras i am in other state from many years. But the case was registered in Haryana. So what can be done in this case?
1.Shall my family & uncle family have to take Bail and how this case can be dismissed as its a completely false case.
2. where as i have put divorce case before they have put all those case in my state where i am staying.
Anonymous
07 December 2009 at 19:06
section 7 of criminal law amendment avt is bailable or nonbailable? and punishment is for how many yars?
Ganesh
07 December 2009 at 09:06
A person accused under 307 IPC. During the Trial if
(i) The victim/complainant witdraws the complaint
(ii) The victim/complainant does not appear in the court
what will be the status of the case?
will the accused be acquitted in above cases?
Ganesh
07 December 2009 at 09:03
A person accused under 307 IPC. During the Trial if
(i) The victim/complainant witdraws the complaint
(ii) The victim/complainant does not appear in the court
what will be the status of the case?
will the accused be acquitted in above cases?
Kumar Krishan Agarwal Advocate
06 December 2009 at 23:08
1. Suppose one aggrieved party made a complaint to local area Police station(P.S) about the offence.
In bounce back the other party also made a cross complaint after some time at same (P.S).
The SHO/SO threatening that if both parties not resolve the matter and make a compromise application then he will sent to custody and after that you will have to apply for Bail.
What is the way to tackle such situation wisely so that if no compromised will be executed by the complainant he will not arrest by SHO/SO and the reputation of the party will be safe and causes no harm.
2. Suppose if the police officer try to arrest the advocate on any baseless allegation then how it be prevented for being arrest so no harm of reputation of an advocate will be caused.
a). How the advocate tackle his own arrest without the pen, paper and law book etc ?
b). What the legal action will be taken against wrong police officer after free on Bail from court.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Strange Case
In a C.R there are 6 accused and all have been granted bail but one accused has not arranged for surety demanded by the court and thereby is still in custody for the past 2 months. Now the case has reached of charge framing and Magistrate is giving short dates of 14 days stating that as one accused is in custody he needs to be given prefrential treatment. The present case is in goa and all accused involved are residents of mumbai so they are forced to attend matters at such short intervals just because of one of the accused. Is there any provision or judgement contrary to what Magistrate is stating.