Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

umakant   03 January 2010 at 18:12

presentaion of accused before magistrate

if the accused is produced after 24hrs of his arrest what right accused will have at that stage & what order will magistrate has to pass at that time

vinod bansal   03 January 2010 at 15:57

jUDGMENT REGARDING 125 CRPC OF sc

R/Members
Kindly provide me latest judgment of Dec 2009 of (Supreme court of India)in which sc held in this case that wife is liable to maintain her husbabd.Regards
with new year warm wishes

umakant   03 January 2010 at 14:21

N.I.ACT -138

IF the compliant filed u/s.138 by complanat co operative society through its officer upon a resolutin which only contian about filling suit for A/C dues against accused whether accused is entitled for acqiatal?

Advocate.S.A.Siddiq   03 January 2010 at 12:48

commital order 174-a

The trial court passed commital order against accused u/s 174A of IPC . is this order is void or not ? maintainable or not ?

Anonymous   03 January 2010 at 12:07

for passport renual

hai all i am law student. one case filed on my friend sections 506 r/w 34. now he want to renual his passport. in passport application he has to menction his case details or not. if he want to menction he want to take any permission from the court?



PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU   03 January 2010 at 12:00

mudamal recovery

A mobile was recovered from the accused in the offence of the u/s 376 and other section by the police. Chargeseet is already completed by the police agency now my question is that now i would like to lodge the application for the recover the said mobile the mobile is in the name of the fatehr of the accuseed and in the bill also there is the name of his father so father will become the applicant and for the recovery of the mobile pls guide me regards

Anonymous   03 January 2010 at 11:15

u/s 341,147,149,323,325,506 and 34 IPC.

Police received information through telephonically at 10 AM and registered a criminal case u/s 341,147,149,323,325,506 and 34 IPC, vide FIR at 11.50 AM.Distence between police station and place of incident is about 500mts.All the prosecution witnesses as well as complainants says that the time of the quarrel/fight was at about 11AM.There is time deference. Kindly referred the case law and ruling on this point.

Anonymous   03 January 2010 at 09:52

u/s 307 IPC.

Police has registered a criminal case u/s 307,341,323,506 and 34 IPC.As per MLC report of the Doctor there are five injuries on the body of the complainant, injuries nos.2, 3, 4 and 5 are simple in nature but the injury no.1 is grievous in nature i.e. “Swelling present in the left forearm, present about 1cm above the left wrist joint 4”+4”cm tenderness and reddish discoloration of under lung skin, active and passive movements round left wrist joint restricted”. At this case is fixed for C.O.C.Kindly referred the arguable points, latest case law and judgments whether it amounts to u/s 307 IPC or not. Is it covered u/s 326 IPC.

Sumir   03 January 2010 at 01:47

FIR not registered; police accompolice

A routine that FIR is not registered by police; either due involvement of high positioned person with political link or due corruption.
I am aware of alternate ways (moving to court u/s 156(3) CrPC); but whats the use, the same police will be told to register the FIR and investigate; naturally they will try best to hide matter.{even in complaint police inaction is mentioned, its police itself that will be entrusted with above job}

Anonymous   02 January 2010 at 21:14

regarding 506 r/w 34

hai all i am law student. one case filed on my friend sections 506 r/w 34. now he want to renual his passport. in passport application he has to menction his case details or not. if he want to menction he has to take any permission from the court?