I had filed RTI to get audit report of a body/organization/association (name can't be revealed), and got the report dated 12 April 08. I then met with ex manager of the body who told me that the audit involved malpractice, and showed me letter of auditor dated 16th April 08, that he can’t audit the account since it does not have bills; now my question is can I use the letter as evidence; what if both sender (auditor), and receiver (the chairman of body) both denies that the letter is authentic, and that it is a forged document since both are involved in malpractice; i.e. in other words how does the authenticity of signature be checked.
Mr XY has been filed upon with an FIR u/s 409 IPC, without enclosing any evidences relevante to the complaint. FIR has not been signed by complainant on lodging the complaint. Conditional Bail has been granted with with provision of two sureties and got released on surrender-cum-arrest. FIR is of 5 months old. No investigation commenced by IO/SHO, but the accused is under suspension of service. Employer kept quiet, without furnishing any evidence till now, even after given the bail is granted to the accused and not initiated institutional enquiry. Employer has seperate set of instructions/rules, i.e., outcome of chargesheet of IO/SHO is irrelevant for them. What is the recourse
Mr XY has been filed upon with an FIR u/s 409 IPC without enclosing any evidences relevante to the complaint. FIR has not been signed by complainant on lodging the complaint. Conditional Bail has been granted with with provision of two sureties and got released on surrender-cum-arrest. FIR is of 5 months old. No investigation commenced by IO/SHO, but the accused is under suspension of service. Employer kept quiet, without furnishing any evidence till now, even after given the bail is granted to the accused and not initiated institutional enquiry. Employer has seperate set of instructions/rules, i.e., outcome of chargesheet of IO/SHO is irrelevant for them. What is the recourse?
Is second revision of Sec 138 cases (petty case) admissible/tenable in High Court especially if read with Sec 397(3) and 399(3) of CrPC
is Section 324 of IPC is bailable or Non-bailable? can i get Anticipatory bail in this by Session Court?
Hi
MY wife has file false 498a/406 case agaist me in sep 2008(marriage date nov 2005)
What actions i can take aginst her and her family?
Can i file DP3case as in their 498a statement they have written that they have given dowry
as there is time is time limit in harayan for filing the cases against DPA of one year.
but under sction 8 of the same
8. Offences to be cognizable for certain purposes and to be non-bailable and non-compoundable
1[8. Offences to be cognizable for certain purposes and to be non-bailable and non-compoundable-
(1) The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) shall apply to offences under this Act as if they were cognizable offences-
(a) For the purposes of investigation of such offences
Can the courts in haryana take the case filled agaist DP3 by taking into the consideration of the section 8( For the purposes of investigation of such offences)
if not then What happen if the dowery is given after the one year of marriage, is that giving dorwy(after one year of marriage) is not a crime?
I think court should consider the DP3 cases where the 498 registered after one year of marriage under section 8 (Offences to be cognizable for certain purposes )
Please suggest
Mr X is facing a complain u/s 467, 468, 471, 420 on 30 Sept 09. once arrested or surrendered will the chargesheet be filed (in 90 days)from FIR date or arrest?. The regular bail application can be moved in session after remand? If need be can he move to HC for regular bail even if the chargesheet is not filed?
Amendment in crpc regarding cases of sexual offences
R/Members
Kindly submit me recent amendment in crpc regarding cases of sexual offences in which it is provided that trial should be concluded within 2 month if possible.Thanx