sections are 420,466,467 along with 34 of IPC.
That the cheque issued to my client is dishonour, whereas my client provide me 3 addresses of the accused and I am sending the 3 notices at three different places
Now, the remark of post Dept. on 2 notices is as "addressee left" & "Unclaimed"
And about the third notice I had not received the acknowledgment yet I had make complaint to the postal authority they told me that shortly they will confirm..
My question shall I wait for their reply or to proceed further on the remark of Unclaimed ////
Pls reply & provide case laws
Sirs,
As the Courts would not, normally, intervene in the domestic investigation,
Can any body enlighten me whether a Charge Sheet issued to an employee by a Public Sector Undertaking be challenged in the Court of Law basing on the closure of FIR by the Police Authorities?
In offence triable by exclusively Sessions Court, whether magistrate can entertain bail before 60 or 90 days? if suppose he let out on bail what is consequence?
can A justice close a session case witout summoning or without issue of warrent on official witnesses. and if he does show what step will taken by an addi.p.p to store the procution case
father is still working but does not repay his debt, while there has been no property inheritance from him of any kind. Is there any legal binding for repaying his debts.Pls suggest
Respected Seniors,
Pls Help me in the below mentioned case.
FACTS OF THE CASE
3 boys aged 14 years influenced by TV serial,raped 9 years same school girl name Varsha. when arrested and question they admitted their guilt and have shown no sence remorse. They are used to seeing movies regularly in the theatres, playing C.D's, and Internet. All the three of them said they regularly watching Serial named "CROSH" from the X TV Channel and they were influence by it. Hence, they want to taste the thrill practically.
TV Channel before telecasting the serial, they caution that serial is not intended for persons below 18 years age.
Varsha father Mr. Ananda Rao filed a writ petition before H.C of the state, asking the government to immediatel ban the telecast of Serial Name " CROSH". He invokes the cinematography Act, IPC and asked Strictly sensored TV Serials and Cinemas.
The Concerned TV Channel replies that Aban order would violate their freedom of speech and expression and of press.
---****---
Kindly suggest me how to deal with the case as I am the respondent advocate.
Regards,
R Jagadeesh
3/3 L.L.B., Student.
Always ICICI bank refused me to provide the amount against the bearer cheque issued by my dad on the ground of signature mis-match, dispite of verification of my identity and also cross verification of the issuer through phone.Very next day another A/c payee cheque was issued and it get cleared and i had the photo copy of this A/c payee cheque.Does it amounts to Brakrupcy on part of the bank if it is established that both the signature is one and the same? does the account holder had the right to ask for the soft copy of the specimen signature from the bank for the purpose of getting verified the signature by the hand writing experts,with that of cheque refused and the other A/c payee cheque which was issued and also cleard very next day. before filing the petition?
judgment pronounced-accused ordered to pay cheque amount plus 4 thousand fine-if not paid sentenced to go 3 months imprisonment- whether court can take the accused into custody immediately?
Dear experts need your help once more on old query.
Note:- after "brief description" in next para i have mentioned my current query regarding the same.
phone- 94255-35935, 98271-02807
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF OLD QUERY
sir actually matter is that my mother & father are practising in high court of chattisgarh, bilaspur.
one petitioner has given a case to my mother .initially he made affidavit in front of oath comissioner for his own WP (criminal ) matter.
as a result my mother filed an WP (criminal) and also a suit for declaration and injunction before the civil court against the respondents B.
Thereafter petitioner changed his attitude and denied that he has not given any power (vakalatanama) regarding the above said case & he also denies filing of any petition before the said court. When my mother appeared in the civil court , petitioner denied and engaged another counsel regarding he same . before the civil judge class iv ,matter was heard in absense of said petitioner and newly engaged counsel as a result,court dismissed the petition due to non appearance.
Now after few days petitioner of the above said case filed a complaint before JMFC, that we have taken money 2,50,000/- RS for the court fees and we have not filed the case suit,in addition to complaint it is pertinent to mention that petitioner told in their complain that they have drawn the amount by self cheque but in police complain they told about cash payement to us.
in police investigation it is mentioned that cheque is drawn as self cheque by
the petitioners itself.
but now JMFC has registered section 420,467,468-34 of IPC and summoned. sir now what to do prevent from warrant . is there any danger of arrest.which court to be approached
current query:- after court has summoned on 20th january 2010 and next hearing is on 24 february, can police trouble(arrest) us before 24th february 2010, and on day after tommorow i.e. 27th january we are filing revision in the court of DJ against above mentioned sections.
now question arises do we still have to appear on 24 february i.e..., next hearing.
Now what action we should take against the complainant petitioners i m very much worried.
sir please reply and question any imformation you require sir its urgent
my mothers & father phone number are
9425535935
9827102807