Anonymous
09 February 2010 at 21:19
I have given undated and without amount cheque to a party as security in 2006 now we have some dispute in business he filled the cheque and diposited in his a/c and he sent me notice u/s 138 but in notice reason for cheque is bank a/c nois incorrect. as in 3 years a/c no in bank changed though at the time of cheque presentation i was not having sufficient funds but bank returned cheque quoting- correcta/c no reuired ,Bank didnt gave insufficiant balance clause can i survive from 138 on this matter
Rekha.....
09 February 2010 at 17:32
Dear Sirs/ma'am
Anybody can provide us the citation w.r.t to that the Government department (Post office) shall not dispose off or destroy or remove the all records when the legal proceedings are going on before any court ,tribunal, forum, state commission against such Government department.
In our one, case Post officials are taking the defense before the JMFC, (the ruling) that after 18 months they can dispose destroy or remove the records . But proceedings are going on in the State Commission for the said case. The said Department is not producing the relevant documents for which V applied for.
Legal proceedings are going on under Sec.200 of CRPC.
Please Its Very Very urgent.
Thnks
Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate
09 February 2010 at 13:35
sir,
can 340 cr.p.c. application not pressed before d court?
if yes ,dn appairence of applicant is must?
Anjali Arya
08 February 2010 at 22:43
In our case the Licencee has been adjudged to vacate the property and handover the keys to the Licenser/ Owner.
But he has refused to do so.
Now the status of the Ex-Licencee has become of a Tresspasser.
1. Can we initiate criminal proceedings against him ?
2. Whether his family members can also be prosecuted in this Criminal case ?
Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate
08 February 2010 at 21:13
sir,
can 340 cr.p.c. application widraw?
if yes then how?
Anonymous
08 February 2010 at 19:45
Notice of 15 days u/s 138 to accused, How much valuable of proceeding ?
Raj Kumar Makkad
08 February 2010 at 11:54
Respected Experts!
I had seen an authority of Apex Court wherein it was mentioned that if an employer keeps employees provident fund contribution and deduction with him and do not deposit the same with employees fund authorities as per rules of EPF & MP Ac within prescribed time, then he is liable to be punished under sections 406/409 IPC but I could not find tha citation.
Can anyone help me and provide the reference of that citation?
J.Kheezer
07 February 2010 at 19:35
Dear friends,
Let me know about kidnapping and murder cases and citations.
I am handling a case of kidnapping and murder in Maharastra, I hereby invite the learned friends to give their invaluable suggetions with regard to procedure ,provisions of law and citations on Sections 364,302,201 R/W 34 of IPC.
I will be greatful to you all for your kind and necessary involvement in this regard and promise you that let us interact with each other thorough this media and learn more and more about the different edifices of Law and Law in practice.
jkheezer36@gmail.com
Sumir
07 February 2010 at 15:31
I am trying to collect various judgments of SC and Bombay HC regarding prompt registration of FIR on receiving cognizable complaint. Can some one post all related judgments over here? e.g State of Harayana V/s Bajanlal, lalita kumari's case, Bombay HC judgment stating that police can refuse to file FIR and conduct preliminary inquiry etc.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
138
I have given undated and without amount cheque to a party as security in 2006 now we have some dispute in business he filled the cheque and diposited in his a/c and he sent me notice u/s 138 but in notice reason for cheque is bank a/c nois incorrect. as in 3 years a/c no in bank changed though at the time of cheque presentation i was not having sufficient funds but bank returned cheque quoting- correcta/c no reuired ,Bank didnt gave insufficiant balance clause can i survive from 138 on this matter