Anonymous
22 March 2010 at 17:14
Dear all,
FIR for a civil related matter under section 420 was regitered on our company by the local police we tool anticipatory bail and got it regularised .
as it was financial dealing matter the police requested me to work out compromise formula wth complanint so that B report can be filed and we offered the same to the police.
they insisted we meet the party and tell the same to save thier own skin as they hv done a blunder to file criminal case for civil matter.
when the compalinant met me the MD of the company wth our employee in a hotel he fabricated another story of threatening against him and police has filed under 506.
wht shd i do is anticipatory bail neccessary , can they arrest me , how fast i get the AB and can i be at home atleast till i get the AB, pls help me immediately.
wht is difference wth 506 B
SOS
Anonymous
22 March 2010 at 17:10
hi,
iam aware of the fact the thid relates to cruelty to women soon before death, but if the death cause is natural and and lets assume that the woman died due to "heat stroke" but the death occured within 15 months of marriage, so should bail be provided to accused,and also to assume that the accused is still under trial u/s 498-A, but the charge framed still not decided despite doctor's evidence and chemical report both have been reached the court?
Anonymous
22 March 2010 at 15:53
Hi,
My query is that cud you pls explain in details 304-B of IPC as to what are the real ingredients of conviction under this law?, If the death occured stands natural by all fareness, then will the accused still convicted under this section off law?
Manish Raj Verma
22 March 2010 at 00:38
hello sir/madam,
i have heard of a latest ruiling of supreme court in which it had said that the relatives of husband, i.e. father/mother/brother/married sister/brother in law, who are not living with the applicant wife, who has lodged 498-A, 3/4 dp act etc. etc., against her husband and all the members of family, (including those who are living separately like brother doing business at some other places and married sister/brother in law), cannot be said to be indulged in the matter, or some thing like that.
please suggest me some, with complete details.
Thanks
Anonymous
21 March 2010 at 23:53
hello sir/mam,
my uncle is arrested under ipc 409 and 420 cases.hez working in andhra bank, arrested on 17th of dis month.we hve applied for da bail but dey r saying as da case cme 2 hearing.so how can v overcme frm da case...how can v aple for da bail in dis case.should v need 2 aple two times for 2 cases uh..plzz help me in dis case...
Trinadha Rao
21 March 2010 at 22:03
Please let me the following in little detail and simple Language:
Que.How to get and What is the Cost of Regular Bail U/S 498A?
Abhiraj
21 March 2010 at 21:40
Dear Sirs,
Good u please tell me that is 498A is compoundable by lower and Session court in Madhya Pradesh??? or it is only compoundable through high court for Madhya Pradesj???
Rahul Singh
21 March 2010 at 11:44
Whether examination of Complainant on oath is mandatory as per S.200,202 of Cr.P.C.in Cheque bouncing case? Also S.138,142,145(1)as Non-Obsstante clause does not relieve the Magistrate to examine the Complainant on oath? Give ruling of S.C.in priority i.e.only affidavit is sufficient & examination of Complainant is not mandatory.
rajvinder singh
20 March 2010 at 22:45
sir my query is that i filed the complain of 138 ni act using poa of some person.the service has been effected. the accused has been admitted on bail.now the case is listed for complainant evidence.i want that the person who is the attorney should not be examined again.the real complainant be examined and xxxxexamined by the accused.
what should i do for this purpose.
whether i should move an application to file fresh affidavit on the behalf of complainant or record his statement in the court.
how can i remove the attorney and can bring the real complainant on judicial file
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
138 n.i.act cases
Sir,
In 138 N.I.Act Notice, the word liability or debt should be mentioned in the notice, further, dues from the accused mentioned notice is it suffucient for 138 N.I.Act notice, please comment on this.