Decode Ballistic Reports Like a Pro. Register Now!
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

shoaib   11 April 2010 at 17:20

on section 376 and 420 of IPC

sir, whether supreme court of held that when the prosecutrix and accuse were major n they have consensus sex. girl on the promise of marrige had sexual intercourse. But later lodge a report of alleging rape. supreme court held that offense of rape is not made out and it is the duty of the prosecutrix that not to have sex merely on the promise of marrige as the sex before marriage is not condition precedent for marriage. Sir in the year 2008 to 2009 this judgment was reported can u help me in finding out that in which journal it was reported.

B.B.R.Goud.   11 April 2010 at 16:45

police manual?

can any body provide the police manuals in force, in india?

Arvind Singh Chauhan   11 April 2010 at 16:25

CITATION REQUIRED ON 446 Cr.P.C.

Sir,
Please Suggest some citation which can help to pray to court that surety has made enough efforts to find out the accused but now he is unable. Surety wants to pray to court for remission of bail amount to be deposited by him.

B.B.R.Goud.   11 April 2010 at 15:59

can any one go forensic science lab for a proof?

can any one or Advocate approach the Forensic Science Lab, for getting the reports?

if not, what is the procedure to access the Forensic Science Lab?

Legal Fighter   11 April 2010 at 15:18

How to Challenge the Order of Criminal Writ Petition?

Can I challenge the Order of High Court passed in Criminal Writ Petition by filing writ petition in Supreme Court? Please let me know.

Vijayakanth Murugan   11 April 2010 at 13:50

Criminal Proceeding against Power of Attorney Holder

Dear All,

My query is as folows:

The situation is a pvt ltd company is in business with a proprietory concern. The proprietory concern is represented by its power of attorney holder (Proprietor is mother, giving power to her son to represent her due to her old age). The Specific POA given by the proprietor is silent whether the Power will defend the Criminal proceedings initiated against the company, Moreover the POA does not have any liability clauses on the power holder. Is it is legally possible to initiate Criminal Proceeding against the power of attorney holder on behalf of the company, More specifically, Is it possible to initiate Section 138 case under NI Act against the power holder incase of any cheque given by the power holder on bahalf of the Proprietor gets bounced.

Kindly Clarify. Thanks in advance.

Regards
Vijay

Anonymous   11 April 2010 at 13:48

Criminal Proceeding against Power of Attorney Holder

Dear All,

My query is as folows:

The situation is a pvt ltd company is in business with a proprietory concern. The proprietory concern is represented by its power of attorney holder (Proprietor is mother, giving power to her son to represent her due to her old age). The Specific POA given by the proprietor is silent whether the Power will defend the Criminal proceedings initiated against the company, Moreover the POA does not have any liability clauses on the power holder. Is it is legally possible to initiate Criminal Proceeding against the power of attorney holder on behalf of the company, More specifically, Is it possible to initiate Section 138 case under NI Act against the power holder incase of any cheque given by the power holder on bahalf of the Proprietor gets bounced.

Kindly Clarify. Thanks in advance.

Regards
Vijay

MSC Shekar   11 April 2010 at 11:06

Is Simulatenous 340 CrPC Proceedings Possible

In a Civil Suit, The Registration Department made a false deposition on a Document containing no link documents and making it valid in a court of law. The decree went into the favour of the Plaintiff

Later the defendante in this case contested the important exhibit related to this suit in the High Court thru Writ Petition. To escape the situation the Registration Department failed to contest this Writ Petition.

The Order by the Hon'ble high court was given infavour of the Petitioner/ Defendant (in Civil Suit) and against the Registration Department.

Since there is a purgery in both the courts by Registration Department. Can two 340 CrPC proceedings be intiatied against the Registration Department in the High Court and trial Court simultaneously??

Please advise.

Y Singh N Rajput   11 April 2010 at 07:09

S138

Party filed a case u/s 138 alleging cheque bounce, purportedly issued for payment of part interest of the principal amount. Plaintiff says that the principal amount was extended as secured loan against property. The palintiff's prime occupation was service in a state government department. He had no licence for money lending. This appears to be a an isolated case on record of money lending. On cross examination the plaintiff agreed that he had no capacity to tender the large amount. He says that his acount was operated by a third party who conducted transactions. Allied facts include -1. The mortgage deed was unregistered. -2. The details of cheques in the mortgage deed and banker's certificate also differ.-3. No civil /cr case filed for recovery of the pricipal amount.
Please comment about (a) whether the plaintiff can be regarded as a money lender? (b) what are chances of plaintiff winning this case?

Ladhu Ram Chowdhary   10 April 2010 at 22:18

Probation

2. The degrees of Criminal intent and resultant Criminal liability are directly proportionate to each other, therefore, a person who causes death by rash or negligent act can be punished for imprisonment up to only two years whereas, the person who knowingly or intentionally commit it can be imprisoned for ten years / life term and even can be hanged. To the contra, a convict u/s. 304-A I.P.C. seldom gets benefit of probation whereas a similarly situated culprit of Section 304 part II I.P.C. may get it. Examine the justification behind it ?