meenu katuria
24 April 2010 at 05:38
sir sum1 hit my car while was standing on red light we hav car no v info 100 no file a complaint now police in converting that into fir u/s279 i cum 2 no in tat the will take my car also in their custody but i hav get it done repair my car and already file a claim 2 insurance co but not claim was realise
my query is if police take my car in custody as case property then wat is the procedure 2 get realize under superdari and where it has 2b file and wat doc along with the application is req any court fee etc is req. and wat is the formate for delhi
regards
kanti kumar
24 April 2010 at 02:15
A complain case was filled for the offence u/s 420,468,471,1210b IPC against no. of accused before the ACMM as the police were delaying the execution of FIR and side by side they have compleated the investigation and found that the accused person were guilty but i think the police has taken bribe from the accused party for not making fir so what is the best alternative left with the complainent , and what are the step by step procedures before ACMM in this case.
Member (Account Deleted)
24 April 2010 at 01:02
Sir, if I loose a civil service case in high court and it involves a criminal part of harassment,which was neither considered nor decided in that case and never filed before criminal court, then, can I still file a criminal writ petition praying a writ for prohibition of victimisation and action against erring officials?
Is there any bar against such petition if victimisation includes discontinuance of my services also, which was issue under service petition?
Can court still take action against erring officials in criminal petition with or without considering services matter?
Member (Account Deleted)
24 April 2010 at 00:49
sir what will happen if a person doesn't take bail or produce surity in a summons issued by SEM under sec.107/150 on a false and forged kalandra prepared by police?
IF a person is sent to J.Custody on behalf of this false and mendacious kalandra then how could he be compensated and what action against erring officials be initiated including SEM?
Is such a summons harmful to a govt. employee if it is proved false and mendacious?
How can an innocent person defend himself to avoid production of surity and quashing of such summons?
balaji
23 April 2010 at 21:24
sir one false complaint againaist me complainent father is christian complainent name is hindu name he claiming sc police registered case scst poa act may kindly clarify scst poa imposing correct or not? he is minority christian
Sir my client was ordered to pay Rs 300/- pm to wife, at the time when the maximum maintenance amount was up to Rs 500/-(before the new amendment in Cr.P.C.). Now the new amendment has come in to effect, having maintenance limit up to Rs 5000/- according to Uttarakhand's stete amendment. My client's wife has applied to court for enhancement for Rs 2000/-.
Sir I am of the opinion that, because maintenance awarded earlier was according to old provision which might be maximum Rs 500/-. New amendment should not be applied here, having no specific clause in amendment Act. Now court can enhance only up to Rs 500.
Am I wrong or right ? please suggest. Sir if I am right please suggest the law or citation if any, that I may satisfy to court.
LK Salecha
23 April 2010 at 14:30
My client has issued blank dated cheque to his supplier as security cheque on 31may2009 for Rs.7 lakhs,to be used if my clients client does not pay to the supplier on due dates.My clients client paid on two occasions on 8 june 2009 Rs two lakhs & 12 july 2009 Rs. two lakhs.On 16 july 2009 my clients supplier presents the cheque for Rs.7 lakh. Cheque dishonours due to insufficient fund. My client's supplier sends thru lawyer a legal notice. My client does not reply. Now they have filed court case under negotiable instrument act 138.
My client didnot owe to his supplier Rs.7 lakh on 16 july, as Rs.4 lakh was paid before cheque presentation date.
Can this case be dismissed as my client's supplier has presented the cheque for amount, my client did not owe.
Anonymous
23 April 2010 at 10:08
In a criminal case xerox copy of the FIR filed in a court was obtained unlawfully bearing the initial and seal of the magistrate with date. One govt. department without filing copy application obtained it, attested as true copy with sign and seal of office not having certified copy with it, which is an offense under IPC 107,120(A), 420, 468, etc. Several complaints were sent to the concerned court and high court, asked information under RTI Act, but all became futile. On petition was given to the District Judge in open court on 30 April, 2009, no action was taken. Information regarding action taken was asked under RTI Act but no reply was received.
Is there any means for action including private complaint against the govt. officer who signed and issued attested true copy with his official designation and who has no power and jurisdiction to do so?
forgery by govt. official
Sir,i was employed in govt. among a batch of 70 employees on similar terms
I was faked out by a senior official two years ago through a fake office order that my re-engagement was not approved by competent authority.
I stopped going at work.
Later i came to know that all my juniors were retained and also forgery in issuing the above office order that there was no re-engagement ever in existence and only initial contractual appointment was extended from time to time.Hence I was made fool and compelled to leave the job myself.
Can I still take a police/criminal action against the issuing authority for committing forgery?