jayachandran
25 April 2010 at 11:40
A warrant was issued by CJM under Sec.14 of SARFASI Act to take possession.The warrant is still pending. What is the remedy for the borrower.Whether a Criminal Revision is maintainable in District Court. DRT, Chennai had given a decision in some other case that against an order of CJM made under Sec.14, appeal before DRT is not maintainable. Appeal can be filed only if possession is taken.
What is the remedy available
vinod bansal
24 April 2010 at 23:46
R/Members
I am representing the complainant in a crl revision against summoning order of magistrate,accused has taken a ground in their revision for setting aside order of summoning on the ground that he was not present at the spot at the time of occurrence rather he was on duty in a bank at that time.There is numerous citations in which courts time and again held that plea of alibi cannot be taken at the stage of revision against summoning order,but presently not a single is available with me.Kindly provide me.Thanx n Regards
vinod bansal
24 April 2010 at 23:39
R/Members
I am representing in a crl revision against summoning order of magistrate,accused has taken a ground in their revision for setting aside order of summoning on the ground that magistrate has not passed a speaking order,court ought to consider all evidence and than pass an order,as i think prima facie case is sufficient for summoning,court has relied on my citation UP Pollution board..SC and summoned the accused.Kindly suggest me some latest citations on this point in which courts held that prima facie case is sufficient to pass a summoning order in a pvt crl complaint.Thanx
vinod bansal
24 April 2010 at 22:26
R/Members
I wrongly filed crl appeal instead of crl revision against discharge order in a pvt crl complaint before sessions court,limitation is not disputed,kindly suggest me any citation in which it was held that court can treat appeal as reviosion in given facts.Thanx
Anonymous
24 April 2010 at 20:32
I want certain acquittal judgements of Supreme Courts u/s. 7 of EC
Mr Sreejit
24 April 2010 at 19:53
RTI APPLN TO KOLKATA POLICE FEB 03 2010
AND
ANOTHER APPLN TO HIM DTED MAR 03 2010
WERE MERGED MINGLED TANGLED AND THE REPLY WAS RECD ON MAR 18 2010 WITH AN 'ESSAY' TYPE AND PARAGRAPH TYPE 'WRITE-UPS' WHERE THE INFORMATION I REQUIRED IS A PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORIGINAL RECORD, ALSO THE INFO. GIVEN IN THIS FORM IS IRRELEVANT, UNREAL, FABRICATED AND INCOMPLETE.
I APPLIED TO THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY AND WHILE WAITING FOR THE REPLY ASO APPLIED TO THE COMMISSIIONER STATING THE WILFUL DELAY CAUSED IN REPLY AND IRRELEVANT REPLY SENT TO ME AFTER THE LAPSE OF 30 DAYS.
EVEN THIS DOES NOT EVOKE ANY REACTION EVEN AFTER LAPSE OF 14 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF MY APPLN TO COMMISSIONER.
SHOULD I STILL WAIT WITH PATIENCE OR FILE IT TO CIC OR CAN I GO TO NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, BECAUSE WBHRC IS A FAILURE TO THE RTI I SENT TO THEM WHICH IS ALSO NEARLY 2 MONTHS OLD.
ALL MY HOPE IN STATE ADMINISTRATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF JUDICIARY IS GONE.
CAN I APPLY TO UN OR ANY INTERNATIONAL FORUM FOR JUSTICE .
AFTERALL JUSTICE HAVE NO BOUNDS.
Anonymous
24 April 2010 at 19:41
I am in need of EXPERT CRIMINAL LAWYER WITH EXPOSURE TO 'STATE Vs.CASES, AND FANTASTIC TRACK RECORD.
I would like to file a case against West Bangal Govt for compensation for negligence/lapses/wilful delay/ignoring attitude to use their police force to do proper, scientific and menaingful invstigation in my burglary case where I lost valuables worth several lakhs.
I have done all my homework and also have some vital evidences.
The compensation I expeect is an 8 digit figure. mutualy acceptable terms of fee is OK.
pls contact by sms at me at 9830928232
in full confidence .
Mr Sreejit
24 April 2010 at 19:34
Dear ALL,
My house burgled thrice through same source. the third time the culprits entered by intruding into my private land by removing the window bars of their window facing my courtyard. i came to know vide my rti letter that the police had closed the case and FRT or FTR (what they cal it) by arrested and subsequently released a person from a remote place f other district, who is totally unconnected to the building through which the crime happened.
The first two instances also the culprits entered from the same neighbourhood building ( whcich is a compact house) but through their third floor terrace to my terrace and broken open the two doors at by top floor. I was believing that the tress pass and theft from the ground floor, and through my priate land is the most visible and tangible channel to book the other two also, but it is giving off.
Please guide me what should I do immediately. We didnot receive any communication of such closure of FIR. The fir date is 28/11/2009 under a PS of Kolkata.
Help Guidance welcome as a SOS effort.
Anand (name changed) 9830928232
Member (Account Deleted)
24 April 2010 at 09:12
Sir one of my relatives sent some faxes to my department two years ago with my forged signatures.
I managed to get original signatures forged by him.
what step can be taken against him?
Can I still make a police complaint against him?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
vicarious liability
my father who was an employee of bharat pumps commpresoor ltd a public sector undertaking.his job was to get deal in insurance related matters of company.he reetired after on superannuation on 31 dec 2000. in 2003 he got a summon from cbi,anti corruption court lucknow saying he is an accused in a case where he processed a claim for the company and got the claim admissible to the company which is 100% subsdiary of govt of india.cbi says that the said marine insurance claim filed by my father on behalf of the company was otherwise not admisible.my qns is wether my father is accused for corruption, secondly he did everything as an employee of a company.he retired at 60 with 34 yrs of service with utmost sincerety.now he is fighting the case by his own,he does not even gets pention,he is 70 yrs now sick with all sort of old age disease.pls advise on:- (i) can a person be accused under sec 13 1 r/w 13 2 ie is corruption,where the said claim has been deposited in account of company of govt of india.
(ii) what is mensrea factor of my father (ie is main ingredient of a crime)
(iii) how can cbi decide that the said insurance claim was inadmissibe and the court without deciding about the admmissibilty of the claim directly started the trial and decide that my father is an accuse and progressed with the case.