Vikas Aneja
28 August 2010 at 21:36
Whether there is necessity to plead in evidence about the caste of the accused in complaint case under SC & ST Act.The complaint is at consideration stage for summoning. I have only give evidence about the caste of the complainant not of the accused.
Chetan
28 August 2010 at 12:38
The accused get anticipatory bail in Mar 2009 for the offence of 420, the conditions is mentioned in anticipatory bail that the accused have to get regular bail in june 2009 before court, but the accused failed to do so,
On Dec 2009 the accused gets the summons from concerned police station which states the police is going to filed chargsheet in the court and therefore the accused have to appear before court on 30/12/2009
……. But the accused failed to do so
The accused also failed to appear on Feb 2010 the date fixed by the court.
Now the next date is 30/10/2010
Whether the accused will get regular bail ?
What the courts will do ?
Whether the accused be arrested on same day ?
Pls reply me urgent ………….
dipankar
28 August 2010 at 11:45
My friend has lodged a Scheduled caste case against a person who is of forward caste. There are also 4 Witnesses of the case. The case is under investigation by the DSP.It has been almost 20 days that my friend has informed the local police station about the case. but the DSP is taking a long time to investigate the case. Please guide what steps should he take further if the investigations take such a long time
dipankar
28 August 2010 at 11:17
How long does a DSP require normally to investigate a Scheduled caste case.
aslam
28 August 2010 at 10:50
sir.
pl suggest should i straight away go to supreme court for abp as i m in delhi rather than going to patna high court as it is far off. Also abp in patna high court application is heard not in less than 3 months.
can i expect abp in supreme court in one week . sir pl suggest this as this action of mine can determine the future of all my dependant family my old parents, 4 studying brother and sister .
sir can u please suggest some supreme court lawyer for the purpose.
Anonymous
28 August 2010 at 08:04
Dear Sirs,
I am uploading a short note for your consideration. I request to be advised how to go about in correcting this situation. In my case, there is absence of sanction and I have valid grounds to show that there is 'Miscarriage of justice' on account of absence of sanction
Thanks
Anonymous
28 August 2010 at 08:01
Dear Sirs,
I am uploading a short note for your consideration. I request to be advised how to go about in correcting this situation. In my case, there is absence of sanction and I have valid grounds to show that there is 'Miscarriage of justice' on account of absence of sanction
Thanks
Anonymous
28 August 2010 at 03:08
31, Jan-2010, I have paid Cash Rs 2, 24,000/- for 10% advance money to purchase a flat & I got a Sale Agreement on Rs 100/- Stamp Paper. As per the agreement we should done this deal within 60 days of agreement. But due to some reason flat owner could not arrange money to close his homeloan on that property & this deal could not materialize. He issued me a Cheque on March 23, 2010 of Rs. 2, 34,000/- (including Rs.10, 000 as penalty) for dated June, 10 2010.He returned me Rs 1,10,000 in two part but now his intension is not to return my rest money as he said clearly. He sold that flat to someone else. I deposited that Cheque on June 10th & Cheque got bounced back reason insufficient fund, again I deposited that Cheque on July 1st & again that bounced with the same reason – insufficient fund. I sent a legal notice on 5th Aug, 2010 through a lawyer which he received & ignored & told me that he will not pay my money. Now I am planning to case against him under sec 138 NIA.I do not have any other legal proof than sale agreement which I got at the time of agreement. Please let me know can I win this case also can I file sec 420 along with Sec 138 NIA ?
Anonymous
27 August 2010 at 22:35
sadsgasfdhgsadfghsafdhgsadhgsaghfghfhgsfhgafhgfc
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
SECTION 138
dear sir
i want to know about stop payment cheque
matter are as under
i am trader of stock market
i give a cheque to the share broker
but broker sell my all shares without
my consent so i was stop payment instruction to the bank and bank have already stoped permenantly but party diposited cheque in the bank first time
cheque was return with remark "stop payment by drawer" but not send me notice
but party deposited again after four month
and return with same reason "stop payment by drawer" and send me a notice
my questation is notice is maintanble?
in my point of view
stop payment by drawer ?
and
account has been closed
in two reason not to deposit again notice issue in first time
am i right?
please advise me
thanks