d.prabhakar rao
13 November 2010 at 13:12
how to get supremecourt registry on internet to know status of appeal from ap highcourt by cbi in a criminal case
ap highcourt no. crla 1297/2003
Anonymous
13 November 2010 at 12:40
THE ISSUE FRAMED IS OF CHILD WELFARE.
CAN THE MOTHER AS OF RIGHT SUCCEED IN LIGHT OF THE FACT THAT SINCE AGE OF 3 YEARS TO 5 YEARS THE CHILD WAS AND IS WELL MAINTAINED BY THE FATHER .
Anonymous
13 November 2010 at 12:32
DOES THE PERSON AGAINST WHOM AN APPLICATION U/S 340 Cr PC IS PREFERRED.DOES SUCH PERSON HAS NAY
LOCUS STANDI TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MISC APPLICATION EVEN BEFORE ANY PRELIMINARY ENQUIRY HAS NOT BEEN CONDUCTED.
that person is summoned to file reply--is it the correct procedure.
Anonymous
13 November 2010 at 10:48
I am Complainant and my next date is judgment i want to ask one query after the judgment what punisment given to accuse two year punishment or cheque double amount please advise me
Anonymous
13 November 2010 at 10:41
Whether order taking cognizance of an offence is a final order?
Anonymous
13 November 2010 at 09:13
Respected sir,
My cheque is return a endorsment of signature differ so may i file complain on 138 n i act?
Any citation?
artabandhu
12 November 2010 at 23:26
is it admissible by any court of law for filing a 1cc case by mentioning unknown accused person in the name of the accused person column.
vinod bansal
12 November 2010 at 21:44
R/Members
Is it correct that private complaint cases after recording of after charge evidence or after charge framed are treated by the courts as state cases,kindly also tell me legal position in 138 NI Act complaint cases in given facts.regards
Advocate. Arunagiri
12 November 2010 at 21:32
Can any body help me in finding the udit narayanan case decided by SC, on quashing powers of HC.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
204, 227 , 397 Cr P C
SIR,
A COMPLAINT WAS FORWARDED TO JMFC
4 WITNWSS EXAMINED AND ISSUED PROCESS AND SUMMONED THE ACCUSED AND CASE COMITTED TO SESSIONS.
SESSIONS COURT WITHOUT CONSIDERING THE RECORDS DISCHARED THE ACCUSED U/S 227.
IN 397 TNE COURT OVERLOOKING THE JMFC GROUNDS OF PRIMAFACCIE CASE ,AND WITH OUT DISCUSSUING THE SUPREME COURT CITIATION PLACED ON RECORD, AND SHOWING SYMPATHY TOWARDS ACCUSED INSISTED THE COMPLAINANT TO TAKE BACK HIS CASE,AS THE COMLAINANT DENIED HAD INSITED ON JUSTICE, BUT THE REV.APPLI WAS DISPOSED BY UPHELDING SESSIONS ORDER.
COMPLAINANT HAS APPROCHED THE APEX FOR JUSTICE ..
PLEASE COMMENT ON THE MERITS OF THE CASE.