Anonymous
14 November 2010 at 14:21
I have filed a complaint under sec 138 of negotiable instrument act. The complaint is for argument stage and Hon'ble JMFC has raise a query i place as under
complainant have a medical shop and he sale a medicine to the another medical shop through third person. But when we filed the case the accuse has put his defence that the medical shop for which medicine is given is not in existence at the time of medicine sold. and also put technical defence that drug license number of purchase shop is not mention on the invoice. complainant also admit in cross examination that there was a process of written order from purchaser on his shops letterhead. complainant has licence to sale the drug. JMFC put query of legally enforceable debt on above defence of accused. Please give some authority or guidance to me.
is it possible to file 438 by poa holder
can anticipatory bail be filed thrugh power of attornye holder.is there any authority.
Anonymous
14 November 2010 at 11:22
Speed Post containing valuable documents including blank negotiable instruments or even ordinary mail, addressed to non-resident Landlord, received by unauthorised Occupant, neither being passed on to the addressee nor returned to the sender, how can such illegal acts of the occupant be booked by local Police and what is the remedy for the hapless landlord
Anonymous
14 November 2010 at 11:14
Unauthorised Occupant of Landlord's house filing complaint of landlord's having Voter ID card for his own house address in addition to similar EPIC for his usual ordinary residence, whereas latest Electoral Rolls do not show landlord to be a Voter at his own house address;
What is the counter action that the Police could or should initiate against such false complainant for harassing Landlord as also Police machinery ?
R.Gundurao
13 November 2010 at 22:51
Is there any procedure to be followed at recording the death statement?
Is there any time limit for it?
Is there witnesses is required at the time of recording? other than the Doctor?.
Anonymous
13 November 2010 at 17:51
is there any case law where wife has been convicted?
Anonymous
13 November 2010 at 15:24
In 2006 i was booked under IPC 420 & 471 for having 2 PP. After i came out on bail the judge said me to come back when i receive summon from court. I received summon after 4 years, first hearing was in Jan 2010. From then on i visited court around 3 times then one day examination was done then after that i had 4 more hearings. I had a talk with my lawyer he said police is not attending the court that is why i am getting dates. I am fininacially finished as this thing is going on from last 5 years. I am jobless. i use to work overseas and i am getting good offer from my previous company but because of my pp i am not able to do anything.
Please let me know
1. is there any way that i can speed up my case?
2. how long will court wait for police to show up, is there any time limit or any number that they should show up within?
Anonymous
13 November 2010 at 14:09
dear experts--
please tell what are the rights of accused to ask specific questions to wife or
are there any some barriers to ask some questions which are important for accused?
how many copies of f i r 498a
sir its wonder that in 498a
what is in court is different fir with different information but same serial number
what is attached in d v maint. claim is different information but the same serial number.
what is with charge shit its a different one is different information but the same serial number.
more over that what information given in d.v. statement is totally false and different than f i r.
it shows that wife has paid bribe to police to lodge such false complaint.
how may time wife can change her own statement?
what action is possible against police and wife?
out of which two f i r are place before jmfc in d v case
questions is that how many copies are to be made by police?
where at the end of each f i r wife sings and said its all true as per my belief and knowledge and written as per my said information.
my lawyer is silent about all f i r and confused but saying that lets watch what the court think. is my lawyer playing properly?