p babu
14 February 2011 at 14:24
ON THE ADVICE OF "A", a boy 15 years by name "B" put poison in milk and supplied to "C" and after consuming it. C died. Decide, how to prosecute "A" and "B".
pl give reference case law and boy 15 years (minor conditions) Pl give rerence.
MSC Shekar
14 February 2011 at 11:41
In a Civil Suit a government department filed a false Written Statement just to drag on the case. Can take any criminal action against that Government Department?
Thanks in advance
Anonymous
14 February 2011 at 11:21
A Nationalized Bank official carried out certain bogus transactions to show recovery in NPA accounts, which had been sanctioned against mortgage of properties, to avoid the pressure on him for recovery. Later, he followed up with the borrowers and when they were ready to repay the loan, he himself informed his senior officials about his earlier bogus entries and recovered the money along with interest from the borrowers. The Senior officials after considering various aspects, informed the bank official that he could not continue in the service of the bank in view of the bogus entries made by him. They also promised that since the entire money has been recovered along with interest, no criminal action will be taken against him. The bank official, at the request of his senior officials, gave his admissions in writing and thereafter, the bank dismissed him from service. No PF, pension was paid. After two years, the Bank was taken over by another Nationalized Bank. Thereafter, CBI registered a case suo-moto and has prosecuted him in a court of law. Since the officer was no longer a public servant, no sanction order was obtained. Can such a case be taken up for trial when the senior officials of the bank had reached an understanding (orally) and did not file any complaint with police authorities for about three years? Any case laws?
Anonymous
13 February 2011 at 23:50
whether the effect of s324 ipc has taken effect as non-bailable?
chanderKant Tyagi
13 February 2011 at 22:18
Hi,
I am a law student and doing interns as well in districts courts of delhi.One of my village boy filed am application under sec-156(3) against me in panipat court.
he got little scratch injury on his nose somewhere....after 9-10 days we had heated exchange of words...to take revenge he scratch his wound again and got admitted in govt hospital for 2 days and forward application in concern PS by stating that i had gave him that injury...
But because of my gud luck police didnt filed any FIR against me..now after 3 months he just had filled an application under sec-156(3) against me.
Kindly let me know the remedies available to me. before summuning the magistrate u/s 200 crpc i cant approach the session or high court for quashing. Please DO reply ASAP . In other words in current stage i cant approach d high court.
Can i file a defamation suit against him? Kindly let me know any other defence as well. :(
Regards
Chanderkant Tyagi
Anonymous
13 February 2011 at 18:59
CAN A COMPLAINANT WANTS TO WITHDRAW HIS COMPLAINT LODGED WITH CBI UNDER CORRUPTION CASE IS PERMISSIBLE. CHARGESHEET FILED IN COURT AND NOW HE WANTS TO WITHDRAW THE COMPLAINT. HE FEELS HE MNAE A FALSE COMPLAIANT
Anonymous
13 February 2011 at 17:55
What is the penalty when the children of an alcoholic, who have been subject to his physical/verbal abuse over years, sue him?
What kind of evidence need the children need to prove their case?
Advocate.S.A.Siddiq
13 February 2011 at 15:07
In 138 NI case, Bailable warrant has been pending , the accused are absconded in this position u/s 82 crpc proclamation was issued by the court . is it correct one ?( with out NBW)
Roopin
13 February 2011 at 11:37
Hello Sir,
A SLP is filed against the orders of high court, by supressing the material fact of petioner's status which has changed during the pendency of trial under section 138 of NI Act, the fact was also supressed from high court, is SLP maintainable?
The facts here refers to a complaint filed under section 138 of NI Act before the trial court which is dismissed for non joinder of necessary parties and legally enforceable debt, which is challenged in high court by criminal appeal. During the pendency of the case before the trial court, the propriter concern was converted into a private limited company and this fact was supressed by the complainant, both before trial court and the high court and the same suppression is continued before the apex court, hence my question, is the SLP maintainable before the apex court?
This fact has come to the knowledge of the accused very recently, hence this fact if brought before the apex court, is the SLP maintainable?
Thank you.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
high court matter
Dear Experts ,
Is that any high court/supreme judgement for dismissing the appeal filed by wife wherein she pray, the family court has not given sufficient time and chance to conduct her evidence and cross. Actual fact is they took one year to complete petitioner cross and reopen the case thrice at family court.
If any judgement available , kindly share the judgement.