anonym
12 July 2011 at 23:23
I have been falsely implicated us 138.
The story so far:
Earlier counsel was negligent and did not file my reply in time. Cross examination of complainant opportunity gone after 3 hearings. Chaned my counsel as advised by judge.
2nd counsel sends his junior who has no knowledge of procedures like application filing and all. Further weakened my case.
Cross examination formally closed and my Exam-in chief started and is midway.
For you expert people I got the advice that S-311 should be invoked to re-consider closure of cross examination.
MY QUESTION:
THOUGH NOT BOASTING OF MYSELF BUT IF GIVEN A CHANCE FOR CROSS EXAMINATION OF COMPLAINANT- I CAN PROVE MY INNOCENCE IN ONE HEARING.
SO IF MATTERS BECOME WORSE AND MY COUNSEL IS NOT ABLE TO HANDLE IT- IS THERE A WAY WHERE I CAN DIRECTLY CROSS-EXAMINE THE COMPLAINANT AND WITNESS??
Anonymous
12 July 2011 at 20:08
I am a legal officer of a Limited company and my company has been served with a legal notice towards defaulter of payment against corporate mobile connection , now I am afraid that mobile company will try to implicate us in criminal case by invoking section 406 of IPC, so please tell me what precaution can be taken to avoid 156(3) application as the matter is purely consumer dispute.
imteyaz farooquee
12 July 2011 at 19:25
Dear expert,
Solve my problem that section 228 (a) Cr.P.C was amended by CrPC Amendment Act, 2005. Whether it is in force or not ? If it is intoforce, by what notification ?
My second question is that in a Arms Act case, a regular 9 mm pistol ( made in America) has been recovered by the accused. My question is that :-
1. Whether it comes within the ambit of Prohibit Arms or not ?
2. If it comes within the ambit of Prohibit Arms, where the case may be
tried , in sessions court or court of J.M ? Please advice me, in detail.
Anonymous
12 July 2011 at 18:40
“In these facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest, applicant be enlarged on bail on furnishing PB in the sum of Rs. 25000/- with two sureties in the like amount each to the satisfaction of IO/SHO.”
The bail was granted on 6/7/2011 and i received certified order copy on12/7/2011.
IO didnt came to my place to arrest me after bail granted on that date. Previously i had 3 days interm bail which finished on 2/7/2011 and the notice to surrender was given on 29//6/2011 by IO.
Now what should i do? Should i go to police station with sureties or should i wait for IO to come my place for arrest. What is the procedure.
Kindly tell me the procedure.
Kindly help (Its Urgent)
Anonymous
12 July 2011 at 17:42
what happens to the FIR after the case is dismissed by the judge under CrPC 203?Does it cease to exist or is as good as quashed?
Anonymous
12 July 2011 at 17:02
Dear sir,
after 498a, DP3&4 cases on me, my mother, and two brothers all are on bail and living our lives. charge sheet not submitted so far.
I really forgot all this regarding bail and doing my academic research programme in India.
I fear, she will be back to me to stay with me, that I do not wish. What I need to do to keep her away and also is it necessary to track the case and charge sheet.As I am Muslim, is there any advantage in terms of law.
Anonymous
12 July 2011 at 16:40
in 138 N.I case Respondent have gets arrest in technical way of cheque bounce , petitioner have says he give money in the way of cash (amount over from Rs.20000) but he not proved in court, help this point what we do
hemant
12 July 2011 at 15:43
Hello experts
Please provide me the procedure
for IPC section 420
its urgent matter
help and experts advise in the matter is indeed needed.
Thanks
Awaiting for experts comments
Giridhar
12 July 2011 at 14:01
Dear experts,
My uncle made a false complaint against me and my family memebers and the police dept had filed FIR against me under section 324 IPC. After certain explanations they deleted my name in charge sheet.will it be safe for applying passport or will there be any problems during police enquiry. Please provide me a suggestion.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Fighting my own case
I have been falsely implicated us 138.
The story so far:
Earlier counsel was negligent and did not file my reply in time. Cross examination of complainant opportunity gone after 3 hearings. Chaned my counsel as advised by judge.
2nd counsel sends his junior who has no knowledge of procedures like application filing and all. Further weakened my case.
Cross examination formally closed and my Exam-in chief started and is midway.
For you expert people I got the advice that S-311 should be invoked to re-consider closure of cross examination.
MY QUESTION:
THOUGH NOT BOASTING OF MYSELF BUT IF GIVEN A CHANCE FOR CROSS EXAMINATION OF COMPLAINANT- I CAN PROVE MY INNOCENCE IN ONE HEARING.
SO IF MATTERS BECOME WORSE AND MY COUNSEL IS NOT ABLE TO HANDLE IT- IS THERE A WAY WHERE I CAN DIRECTLY CROSS-EXAMINE THE COMPLAINANT AND WITNESS??