Anonymous
26 August 2011 at 21:10
hounrable lawyers,
i want to know is it rohini court a fasttrack court or not????
Anonymous
26 August 2011 at 20:42
hounrable lawyers,
i need your help in the topic of payrol i want to know on which surity a criminal is supposed to came out of the prison like money deposit ,property papers or something else????
thanks in advance for your valuable advice....
Anonymous
26 August 2011 at 20:24
in a case if the accused pleaded guilty in a complaint case, is there any necessity to file a petition praying guilty plea before the Magistrate.
Anonymous
26 August 2011 at 20:22
if substance of accusation is not proper complaint case should reject by Magistrate, please provide some judicial reference on that.
Joy Kumar Roy
26 August 2011 at 19:16
On receipt of Chargesheet it is found that income from salary from Govt. much reduced income was shown by submitting a wrong document The same has been pointed out by an application for correction. But Prosecution is insisted on to face the trail and prove it. Then an application under CR.P.C.227 alongwith correct information obtained under RTI submitted for discharge and also an application under Cr.P.C.340 moved against IO. Judge decided to hear all the three application tegeether. Kindly advice how we should proceed further. Regards.
Anonymous
26 August 2011 at 15:25
DEAR SIR,
I HAVE FILED A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT U/S. 138 OF THE N.I ACT FOR THE DISHONOURED OF THE CHEQUE.
I HAVE NOT FILED THE PURSIS / APPLICATION FOR CLOSING OF THE EVIDENCE BUT STILL THE MAGISTRATE RECORDED THE STATEMENT OF THE RESPONDENT / ACCUSED U/S. 313 OF C.R.P.C AND MATTER WAS KEPT FOR FINAL ARGUMENT BY WAY OF LAST CHANCE TO ME.
I FILED AN APPLICATION U/S. 311 OF C.R.P.C FOR RECALLING OF THE WITNESS THAT IS COMPLAINANT HIMSELF FOR THE PURPOSE BRINING THE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS ON RECORD WHICH ARE CRUCIAL AND VITAL DOCUMENTS FOR THE TRUE , CORRECT AND PROPER DECISION OF THE CASE. AFTER RECORDED THE STATEMENT OF THE RESPONDENT / ACCUSED U/S. 313 OF C.R.P.C
THE APPLICATION OF THE U.S 311 OF C.R.P.C STANDS REJECTED.
PLEASE PROVIDE YOUR VIEWPOINTS
ARE THERE ANY JUDGMENT WHICH STATES THAT IF I HAVE NOT FILED THE PURSIS / APPLICATION FOR CLOSING OF THE EVIDENCE. BUT STILL THE MAGISTRATE RECORDED THE STATEMENT OF THE RESPONDENT / ACCUSED U/S. 313 OF C.R.P.C AND MATTER WAS KEPT FOR FINAL ARGUMENT BY WAY OF LAST CHANCE TO ME.
WHAT TO DO FOR BRINING THE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS ON RECORD.
PLEASE GIVE ME YOUR OPINION & REFERENCE ON IT.
THANK YOU
Anonymous
26 August 2011 at 14:29
i have searched the google but i haven't found this rules
Maharashtra Open Prisons Rules, 1971
Maharashtra Prisons (Remission System) Rules, 1962.
With amendments if any
so it is a request to the members to help me out or can paste the above mentioned rule under this forum.
Rules required.
Anonymous
26 August 2011 at 10:54
I have a cheque from my business partner which I presented to the bank and it got bounced.
Due to other urgent work I couldn't send him a legal notice within 30 days.
Can I present the cheque again (6 months valid time is still there)in the bank and get it bounced and then send legal notice?
Anonymous
26 August 2011 at 09:58
In UP there is a pprocess followed by Allahabad HC in 498A cases- when a criminal writ is filed in persuance of Article 226- Quashing of FIR the court refers the case to mediation and provides 'saty of arrest' with a direction that Mediation centre should submit its results and if its successfull the cases are quashed.
Can anyone confirm that what if the mediation is successfull and both the parties agreed and signed the mediation agreement which stated some conditions like applying MC divorce and some payment.
The boys side complied and paid the amount but then the girls side did not file MC divorce petition.
Now they are praying HC to vacate the stay. Is it possible to back out from agreement at mediation centre that was as per direction of HC.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Bail
A is doctor and B,C,Ds are they are close relative. BCD are working as software engineer at USA. In the year 2000 A and BCD entered a Partnership agreement and started a Multi Spciality Hoispital at Madurai. Tamil Nadu State. Four years passed in the year of 2004 Wife of A came to India with a power of Attorney deed to check up the accounts of the said Hospital. After Checking accounts she found that 1.28 Crs Rupees was misappropriated by the A. A threatened Wife B and compul to registered the Hospital to his name. Immediately wife B lodged a complaint before the concern Jurisdinction Police Station. Because of the Political motive police was not take action. While being so, wife of B was kidnapped by A and E and F and she was broguht to G's office who is highly political Motivated Powerful person and he also threatened wife of B to regisered the hospital in favour of A. B's wife imeediately informed the matter to her husband through Phone. Immediately BCD were came to India and me G at his office. At that time alsos they were threatened and compuled to registered the same and H who is working as Deputy Inspector General of Registration Departgment prepared a sale agreement and G obtained the singature of BCD and they were sent to USA. After some time again they were called to India to registered the sale deed and the regisetertion was completed on 17.05.2010. After 11 months passed B lodged a complaint before the Commissioner of Police Madurai, a case was registered for an offence u/s 365, 368, 384,420, 506(II) r/w 477(A) and 166 of IPC. A is Rank1 Accused A's wife was Ranked as A2 E was ranked as A3 G was ranked as A4 and H was ranked as A5. A E H were remanded for judicial custody. This is the story of the Prosecution. The bail Petition was came up for hearing before the Magistrate Counsel of H agrgued that except section 477(A) all other section are not made out against the H. He statiing that he is did his official function (Registering the Docuemnt)The plea of Counsel of H is correct or not? Is there any relevant citiation for the same? Please clarify the same.