Ajay Kumar Reddy
25 September 2011 at 11:42
I have applied 340Crpc application in my 498A case, JMFC want the answer from the ADPO but he has told that what are the fact and documents that it is already in the court and he has not given any answer of my 340CRPC application. Then JMFC sir, fixed for argument on 340 CRPC. In that day my lawyer is given written argument on 340CRPC application with SC judgment. JMFC sir, given three dates for decide of that application then in the 4th term Respected judge decided that he will decide after listening of final argument and he will decide at final judgment. But at last he has not decided that application. Please give the information of following:-
1. He has not decided 340CRPC application weather it is illegality. Even that he is not written not a single word also acceptance (cognizance) or disposed. He is not rejected that application also.
2. He has convicted me on 498A case, weather I can go to HC for 340CRPC application for not deciding by JMFC.
3. Weather I have right to go to HC for this illegality? After conviction. Can HC directly listen on 340CRPC application. I want to send and I want to discuss on 340CRPC application, not conviction point.
4. I have applied appeal on the session court, but this time I have not mentioned anything about 340CRPC application in the appeal. I feel and JMFC Judge has commented one word “U have given the wrong application”. So I have not written about 340CRPC.
Ajay Reddy
balram
25 September 2011 at 10:52
A girl cheat me. we have relation from 4 years she told me that we will marry we will marry but after 4 year now she left me and she will geting marry on dt 21/11/2011.i have spent lots of money on her.she used me for her sake.she just use me. now i cant leave without her and she knows that after that she left me but i still love her. i want to marry her.i want to back her to my life. or i want to punished her from our indian law is that possible. if is that possible then contact me on balramkishan@gmail.com #92125702001
Anonymous
25 September 2011 at 02:50
This is a moot problem please help me by finding the solution....
Y. T. R. Rao, Advocate, VIZAG
24 September 2011 at 23:03
UNDER WHAT SECTION OF LAW SURRENDER PETITION HAS TO BE FILED? PLEASE DO ADVISE. FACTS OF THE CASE:- A PERSON ACCUSED IN N.I.ACT. HE ABSCONDED AT THE TIME OF JUDGMENT. NEARLY 7 MONTHS ELAPSED. HE WAS CONVICTED AND SENTENCED TO UNDERGO 6 MONTHS S.I. BESIDES COMPENSATION OF Rs. 3 LAKHS. NOW HE INTENDS TO SURRENDER BEFORE THE TRAIL COURT TO UNDERGO IMPRISONMENT. PLEASE ADVICE.
Anonymous
24 September 2011 at 22:39
sir,
if some one wants to file sc/st atrocity case on another person
what is the way.
what is the process.
what are the proofs he has to show to police people to file the case ?
will the police people going to lodge the case immediatley or will they do any enquiry on it first .
Anonymous
24 September 2011 at 22:37
Hi sir,
I applied quashing of a case in high court . its related to a sms from mobile case. will the high court will get the sim card from lower court to verify it ?
why i am asking this is, in lower court they are not able to find out the sim card which is seized by the police people.
whats your say on this ?
did they misplaced in lower court if so what will happen ?
or is it held with higher court
kindly guide me on that.
harish
24 September 2011 at 21:29
Dear sir,
I have filed 340 crpc case as a perjury on 125 crpc running case in magistrate court at the stage of her byan and cross-examination along with a judgement/citation of allahabad high court " 340 dispose off first".but court is not ready to accept it . court says it is not rulling , it is only order.
Judgment :
Court No.29
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Lucknow
Writ Petition No. (M/S) of 2002
Syed Nazim Husain
Vs.
The Additional Principal
Judge Family Court & another
Hon'ble A. Mateen, J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.G.A.
Since a very trivial point is involved I propose to dispose of the petition at this initial stage. Learned counsel for the petitioner has approached this Court with the prayer that the order dated 24.10.2002 be quashed.
From the order dated 24.10.2002 it comes out that the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court on the application, moved by the petitioner under Section 340, 344 Cr.P.C. instead of disposing of the same had postponed disposal of the said application and ordered that said application may be disposed of after evidence is recorded in case No. 566/89.
In my view, if an application is moved in the pending case bringing to the notice of the court that any false evidence knowing well has been filed or fabricated in such proceedings, the court should dispose of the said application first before proceeding any further or before recording of further evidence.
In the circumstances, I dispose of the present application and direct the Additional Principal Judge Family Court to dispose of the application so moved by the petitioner under Section 340, 344 Cr.P.C. before proceeding further in accordance with law.
With the above observations the petition is disposed of finally.
9.1.2003 sd- A.Mateen
Kindly sugest me is there any judgment relatedto this case?
vijay singh Mob.No 9621707070
24 September 2011 at 19:25
Res Sir/madam
with due regard we have submitted i have file an application for summoning the witnesses for reexamining but the judicial magistrate has dismissed my application and further we have file criminal revision of the same grievances but it was also be dismissed. Now we have file petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C. before the Hon'ble Court. I want how to draft this petition? and is there some citations related to this matters .
Manoj Deka
24 September 2011 at 16:10
Sir,
I filed a cheque bounce case u/s 138 NI act the accused gave a written submission to the magistrate stating that within a month he will make all my payment and the accused were freed on bail. till then now more then one year has passed the accused on every date submit a petition throw his counsel stating that his wife is sick and out of station lastly the magistrate issued notice to the bailor to present the accused but the bailor did not do so after that the magistrate issued N.B.W. to the bailor also now the counsel of the accused has filed a review petition to District Judge that issue of warrant to bailor is unjustified how can we handle this.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Investigating officer,etc
My query is regarding a criminal case filed under S 419,420,467,468,471 etc.The FIR was filed before a Sun Inspector of Police.The PSI investigated the case.The statements of witnesses were recorded by two constables assisting the PSI.Subsequently chargesheet was filed in the Court of JMFC.The charges were framed and witnesses were called for examination by the prosecution and the defence.Out of all the witnesses a few were examined but most of them are to be examined yet.Now I have learnt from my lawyers that the Investigating Officer and the constables who assisted him have passed away and will not be available for examination during the trial.I would like to know what will be the implication of this on the trial.
Thanks