Anonymous
03 December 2011 at 08:38
I filed an FIR regarding forgery of my documents u/s 420/467/468/471 and provided documentary evidences to I.O. But later on I came to know that I.O. did not include my documents in Investigation and rather written in C.D. that applicant did not provide any evidence. Than I complained the matter to higher authorities but before authorities, I.O. refused to receive any document. I again given the documents to I.O. and requested him to give receiving of the documents, but he refused stating there is no such system/ rule or law to give receiving of any document during Investigation. I again fear that he may again not enclose the documents in C.D. to benefit the accused. Now my query is Whether there is any such law / rule that I.O. is not bound to issue any receiving of documents. How I can ensure that my documents are enclosed and considered by I.O. Whether through RTI act I can obtain such information. Whether through court I can file the documents . Or I can legally demand receiving from I.O./ any other police authorities.
sushila modi
03 December 2011 at 02:27
Dear all experts,
DV case of my son is running in trial court.
q-may I know the meaning of "incident report" on which DV act is running.( section 12) explain plz.
it is related to last day residence or select any allegation from anywhere/ any time mentioned ,frame and file complaint
q-if the allegations in main complain are clearing by the submitted document of the complainant &.....
.....complaint is full of inconsistent statements.
Hon court consider such complain as null and void or consider under misguiding the court.
as complaint is saying something and submitted document opposite to them.
how to file such application in court
thanks in advance
Manjeet
03 December 2011 at 01:49
My wife has submitted complaint to Deputy Commissioner of Police alleging me of dowry and other related allegations.
I have been done with CAW cell proceedings and it has submitted his report to SP office.
I need to get report as well as other proceedings (Dairy proceedings) from the Police deptt.
To whom i should address my RTI and whose name i should prepare draft or IPO.
Also, let me know to whom all i should copy this to influence them or for moral check.
kindly guide.
Anonymous
02 December 2011 at 23:53
Dear Experts,
In Sept 2009 Mr.X changed Job and was falsely implicated in to IPC 120-B,114,408,420,467,468 etc.He tried for quashing in HC but pulled it back & later went thru all legal process and was finally bailed out from HC. The chargesheet mentioned only two IPC\\\\\\\'s ie 408 & 420.NOw, He regularly attends the court but the complianant is not turning up even after two summons & warrants etc.
My queries are:
How to get the trial started fast so that he can prove his innocence?
How to legally fetch the complinant & witnesses so that they can tell the court anything right or wrong related to this case? they are not turning up becoz they have no proofs of the false complain
Mr X's defamation case related to this incidence is pending in session court, should he go ahead in this? will it help him? in this case?
can he go for charge sheet quashing in HC? if yes on what grounds?
Can he also file a complain against I.O for regestering an FIR without relevant proofs and making it sessions triable case? and sending him to judicial custody for three months? The false FIR consisted 12 IPC's and later the chargesheet had only two IPC's ie 408,420.Its very painfulto go thru the delays in the judical process.
Pl advise in detials:
Anonymous
02 December 2011 at 22:12
I AM ACCUSED IN 138 NI ACT CASE.THE CHQ AMOUNT IS HIGHER THAN AMOUNT I AM LIABLE TO PAY.THE 138 CASE IS MAINTAINABLE ON ME??
Arvind Singh Chauhan
02 December 2011 at 20:54
Police registered the complaint as NCR. Complainant prayed to court, for order to investigation by police.
Court says only concern police can seek permission to investigate the matter. Complainant has no right to pray for such order to investigate.
Whether court is right Plz suggest any case law if any.
Dr Kulwant Rai
02 December 2011 at 16:48
can a treating surgeon of the patient can ask for copy the MLR of the same patient from the forensic expert of the same college and under which rule.
Anonymous
02 December 2011 at 12:53
498 A, 4 & 6 DP ACT case filed in City court.
But wifes party donot want to proceed on this case & would like compromise.
Some one was saying that this case booked under DP act, so cant be compromised.
Its at the mercy of GP & Judge.
Hence they say come prepared for some unofficial payments & it will be closed.
Question to expert: 498a under 4,6 DP act cannt be compromised ?? Is this true or what is the fact please
Anonymous
02 December 2011 at 09:36
can a police officer in case reported by him and investigate by him and produce investigation rpeort to magistrate it is valid or not please suggest me.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Death due to rashness & negligence
Dear Sir/Madam,
Suppose a company undertakes the construction work of a road. And during such construction, an employee of the company accidently comes in contact with a naked electric wire of a machine being used for the construction of the road and he dies due to the electric shock. No rashness or negligence is initially alleged against anybody whosoever.
In the above circumstances, the dependents of the employee can very well claim compensation from the company. But please let me know whether they can prosecute the directors/managers of the company under section 304-A of the IPC as well.