Anonymous
09 December 2011 at 16:01
I was involved in an accident last year. It was a minor accident but the case was filed against me. One hand was slightly fractured so for compensation they filed the case. I was given bail after 2 hours from the police station and the vehicle was given to me the next day. Now the case is in the court .
My question is that after one year when i am selling the vehicle the RTO clerk is not transferring the vehicle in the name of the new owner because there is a accident case registered against me. My papers are intact , insurance cover was there , there is no loan or liability , then why he is not transferring ? I told him that i have not signed any court bond to release the vehicle but still he doesn't listen
What does the law say , Pls advise. Your response will be highly appreciated.
Anonymous
09 December 2011 at 15:10
What is limitation period for filing complaint against offence u/s. 452 of IPC
Anonymous
09 December 2011 at 12:08
IN MY CRIMINAL CASE CHARGES HAVE BEEN FRAMED. THE OTHER PARTY HAS APPROACHED HIGH COURT FOR THE REVISION OF THOSE CHARGES. PLEASE GUIDE ME WITH SOME AUTHORITIES WHICH ARE AGAINST SUCH REVISION PETITION AGAINST THE FRAMING OF CAHRGES, SO THAT THE PROCEDURE OF CHEIF AND EVIDENCE CAN FOLLOW SMOOTHLY?
Paul
09 December 2011 at 09:40
Our CHS Chairman bought a flat adjoining to the society terrace and encroached on it and included the terrace to the tune of 3 feet x 10 feet into his flat. The Municipal corporation has issued a final demolition order in 2008. Till date nothing has happened.
Can such a person be elected as chairman & now he is also the chairman of the re-development team with his band of crooks of the MC as his team for the redevelopment committee.
He has also written off around Rs.30,000/- for utilising the terrace illegally in the SGBM.
Kindly advise as to what all action can be taken against such a person who has signed the M-20 bond i think.
Thank you
Prasad
09 December 2011 at 09:28
Refer to replies given by Barman and singh sir on 8th october.
There was no evidence found during trail of respondent/complaint and it is to set drop the case .
so please advice me how to get on to file a case for defammattion
DEEPAK ASSOCIATES
08 December 2011 at 23:55
The police has filled the challan against the accused in case of 420-467-468-471 & 120 but there are only assertions against the accused in the FIR.
Further, during the investigation the police has put a receipt upon which the accused is a witness in the challan. But there is no averment of this receipt in the FIR and if the same is be taken on evidence it enhance the amount which complainant mentioned in the FIR. e.g.
the complaint has mentioned he entered into an agreement to sell of a shop for Rs 2,00,000/- and he paid a sum of rs 75,000/- on 07/12/11 and further paid a sum of rs 25,000/- to the accused and there are balance Rs 1,00,000/- to be paid at the time of execution.
the accused is neither the witness of these two receipt nor agreement to sell.
but the police has produce a receipt of rs 10,000/- apart from above two receipt (which has not mentioned in the FIR/complaint)
Now in this circumstances can the magistrate discharge the accused, if yes, kindly mention the authorities
Anonymous
08 December 2011 at 23:12
A and b husband,wife. b file maintaince application in ahmedabad, against a , in maintaince application court already pass order. now a file divorce application against b in bhavnagar court,in year 2009. in recently a serve a summanse to appear in bhavnagar court, for ipc sec500, in the complaint a alleged on b that, in maintance application of crpc 125,in her written state ment b blame to a about external affair with one lady named c, on that ground, and also mention this fact in w/s in divorece petition in bhavnagar court, both two ground a flie complaint against b in bhavnagar, what is leagle remedy for b wife? which ground b can file a drop proceding application in court? b wife already transfer divorce petition in ahmedabad.in year 2008, and also ipc 498 and domestik case is pending in ahmedabad against husband.
sumeet
08 December 2011 at 22:39
Sir, In my office one of my subordinate (earlier worked under me for one and half year) was caught red handed by CBI. Now CBI has requested my office for voice verification of the accused, Office deputed me and one my subordinate for voice verification. After careful listening we regretted that we could not identiy the voice of the accused. The proceedings were recorded by CBI. CBI is now giving threatening that they will take severe action against us for non recognition of the voice and we can be arrested for non cooperation. The same is not understood. kindly guide us.
regards
sumeet
ABC
08 December 2011 at 16:33
dear,
sir
i want latest jugement under section 138
only stop payment matter
thnks
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Cheque presented three times without knowledge of accused
hello friends,
in a case u/s 138 NI act, the case was filed after dishonor of cheque while it was presented third time without knowledge of the accused. after third time the cheque was dishonored and notice was given to accused and case was filed. can we take benefit of this three times dishonor without knowledge of accused. any citation or judgement in this regard. please provide