wifebetrayed
03 January 2012 at 03:27
hi
how can i get details of notice/summon issued by police to obtain my presense in court Under what section i can submit an application and what section it is duty of police to issue notice in writing
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Summon-response-from-raj-sir-260856.asp
i was marked absent even though i did not receive any notice from police
denish
03 January 2012 at 00:35
I am working in a Bank. I was awarded a penalty of stoppage of one increment for 3 yrs.At that time I was one increment before the last stage of my salary structure so I could not get the next increment in the forthcoming year but after one year I got the next increment.In our bank there are 5 stagnation increments which are provided after every subsequent 2 years after getting the last structural increment.Due to punishment I got such stage after one year to my batch.After the punishment period I should be kept at par with our batch because the effect of the punishment ended after three years, as it was awarded. But the bank continued providing me one increment after one year of staff of my batch. In these circumstances the punishment of non cumulative effect has been turned as cumulative effect which is illegal and I am getting loss of one increment still for one year. May I go to a criminal court for this damage as my constitutional rights are barred by the bank and they have denied to do me at par with my batch.How can I do it?
soma iyengar
03 January 2012 at 00:19
thanks for your responses
I was secretary - this AGM I (along with the Chairman)was threatened and forced to resign by 5 committee members and 5-6 members. We were afraid of another fight so we did so.
1. It was not on the agenda.(2012 AGM)
2. In the 2010 AGM the person who has filed the harassment case insisted time and again (for over 6 months)that my uncles flat has been transferred without payment of transfer fees. He was assures time and again that same has been done. but inspite of that he raised the point in hte AGM and beat my uncle and threatned my husband with a cricket bat :tu AGM mein bola kaise - tujhe to main nahin chodunga"
3.now he has filed a court case against my husband and my uncle
4. we have gone to the police station and given our statements.
anil kumar agarwal
02 January 2012 at 19:56
some agriculture land in way back in 1961 WAS ALLOTED TO three MENS JOINTLY , 1/4 TO A, 1/4 TO B [BROTHER OF A]1/2 TO C [FATHER IN LAW OF A] IN 2008 A FILED A SUITE AGAINST B IN REVENUE COURT AND SUBMITTED THAT NO PERSONS NAMED C EXITED IN THE VILLAGE AND HE ALONGWITH B IS CULTIVATING LAND FOR LAST 40 YEARS SO THERE SHARE BE DIVIDED, B AS RESPONEDED SUBMITED NO OBJECTION AND REVENUE COURT PASSED A DEGREE WHERBY A WAS DECLARED 3/4 0WNER AND B 1/4 OWNER. C SHARE DECLARED NIL. LATERON SUCCESSOR OF C FILED A CRIMINAL CASE UNDER 420 IPC , CAN A AND B PROSECUTED UNDER 420. 209. 120 IPC ON THIS COMPLAINT
Chetan Pardakhe
02 January 2012 at 19:54
That in the case u/s 363,376 IPC the accused released on bail
After releasing the bail, the accused again attemp to rape on the complaint of which the seperate offence is registered against him u/s 354 IPC and also he threatend to the relative of the victim for which the relative lodged the complaint which is registered u/s 504, 506 IPC
Under such circumstance can victim filed application before session Court for cancellation of Bail
whether the said application be filed by Private Advocate of by Prosecutor
Chetan Pardakhe
02 January 2012 at 19:53
That in the case u/s 363,376 IPC the accused released on bail
After releasing the bail, the accused again attemp to rape on the complaint of which the seperate offence is registered against him u/s 354 IPC and also he threatend to the relative of the victim for which the relative lodged the complaint which is registered u/s 504, 506 IPC
Under such circumstance can victim filed application before session Court for cancellation of Bail
whether the said application be filed by Private Advocate of by Prosecutor
Anonymous
02 January 2012 at 19:28
Can a respondent of a criminal writ petition (filed u/s 482 of crpc quashing a criminal case pending in the lower court relating to a property transaction) file an application in the high court requesting that the high court direct the society (society is not a party to the writ petition) to disclose information about the disputed property transaction. An application was made in the lower court in this regard, but no action had been taken by the lower court. What is the procedure and under what sections of crpc is this covered? Thanks in advance.
Anonymous
02 January 2012 at 19:05
Respected sir
i have already gone through maharastra act 17 of 2008 but i did not found it on official website of govrn of maharastra
adv. butala sudhir sharad ,khed dist.Rataniri maharastra.
AMAR RANU
02 January 2012 at 17:36
In a criminal private case u/s 500 of IPC,a plea of the accused was recorded by the Metropolitan Court after the expiry of six years whereas as per section 251 of Crpc,it is mandatory that in a summons case, the plea should be recorded when the accused appears or is brought before the Magistrate,which means on first attendance of the accused in a criminal court after receipt of court summons.
In the light of the above,what is the significance and legal validity of such a plea recording after the expiry of 6 years when the accused,who is party-in-person and has been appearing before the aforesaid court regularly for the last over 6 years.
It is a vital law point and the same is thrown open for discussion/opinion for the esteemed experts of this open forum.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Complaint against private trust
An institution owned and run by a private trust does not pay up its dues to a service provider. The service provider intends to initiate criminal prosecution against the trust for cheating and other offenses. The trust deed is not available. The registration details of the trust is also not known. The names of all trustees is not known. Only the details of the managing trustee is known.
In the above case, against whom the complaint should be lodged?
Would it be sufficient if complaint is lodged only against the managing trustee or is it necessary to include the names of all trustees in the complaint?